CVs for operating revenue - Wholesale trade – 2022

CVs for operating revenue - Wholesale trade - 2022
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs for operating revenue - Wholesale trade for 2022. The information is grouped by Geography (appearing as row headers), CVs for operating revenue, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Canada 0.64
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.65
Prince Edward Island 0.64
Nova Scotia 0.43
New Brunswick 0.97
Quebec 1.44
Ontario 0.95
Manitoba 0.65
Saskatchewan 0.65
Alberta 1.38
British Columbia 0.32
Yukon 0.78
Northwest Territories 0.28
Nunavut 0.00

Monthly Survey of Manufacturing: National Level CVs by Characteristic - October 2023

National Level CVs by Characteristic
Table summary
This table displays the results of Monthly Survey of Manufacturing: National Level CVs by Characteristic. The information is grouped by Month (appearing as row headers), and Sales of goods manufactured, Raw materials and components inventories, Goods / work in process inventories, Finished goods manufactured inventories and Unfilled Orders, calculated in percentage (appearing as column headers).
MONTH Sales of goods manufactured Raw materials and components inventories Goods / work in process inventories Finished goods manufactured inventories Unfilled Orders
%
October 2022 0.66 1.10 1.82 1.55 1.48
November 2022 0.65 1.10 1.68 1.58 1.46
December 2022 0.61 1.08 1.89 1.57 1.47
January 2023 0.65 1.14 1.81 1.40 1.47
February 2023 0.68 1.15 1.87 1.39 1.53
March 2023 0.66 1.11 1.73 1.39 1.44
April 2023 0.68 1.09 1.61 1.35 1.42
May 2023 0.70 1.11 1.71 1.43 1.44
June 2023 0.72 1.10 1.80 1.51 1.45
July 2023 0.71 1.05 1.70 1.40 1.51
August 2023 0.70 1.06 1.77 1.46 1.44
September 2023 0.67 1.04 1.84 1.49 1.47
October 2023 0.66 1.01 1.90 1.64 1.42

Eh Sayers Episode 15 - A Little Less Misinformation, A Little More True Facts, Please

Release date: December 13, 2023

Catalogue number: 45200003
ISSN: 2816-2250

Eh Sayers Season 4 Episode 3 - A little less misinformation, a little more true facts, please

Listen to "Eh Sayers" on:

Social media shareables

Tag us in your social media posts

  • Facebook StatisticsCanada
  • Instagram @statcan_eng
  • Twitter @StatCan_eng
  • Reddit StatCanada
  • YouTube StatisticsCanada

Visuals for social media

Misinformation graphic 1

A little less misinformation, a little more true facts, please - Eh Sayers with Timothy Caulfield

In the age of social media, AI, and deepfakes, discerning fact from fiction is a crucial skill. Nowadays, we’re not just getting our information from the six o’clock news. Friends, family, researchers, influencers, entertainers, news anchors, advertisers… Who can you trust?

Timothy Caulfield, misinformation/disinformation expert, author, University of Alberta professor, and member of the Order of Canada, and Eric Rancourt, Assistant Chief Statistician at StatCan, join us to explore the challenges posed by our information environment and what can be done to counter misinformation.

Host

Tegan Bridge

Guests

Timothy Caulfield, Eric Rancourt

Listen to audio

Eh Sayers Episode 15 - A Little Less Misinformation, A Little More True Facts, Please - Transcript

Tegan: Welcome to Eh Sayers, a podcast from Statistics Canada, where we meet the people behind the data and explore the stories behind the numbers. I'm your host, Tegan Bridge.

Like everybody else, I get news from a bunch of different places. For me, if I heard a cool tidbit, I probably heard it on a podcast because, shocker, I listen to a lot of podcasts. I also read books, listen to the radio, and, of course, use social media, though I openly admit that I should probably cut back on my social media use.

Just yesterday, I saw two things that weren't quite right. One of these was a video that had been edited to distort the size of a snake to make it look larger and get more views, and the other was a historical documentary with a misleading factoid. The snake video was debunked by Snopes, the fact-checking website, but the misleading documentary... I only caught that because I've read a lot on that topic. That's just one day for one person. And those are just the two pieces I noticed. How many did I see that just passed me by, shaping how I see the world without my even noticing?

What are we supposed to do? For a lot of us, the internet is our main source of information, but our feeds are a bizarre hodgepodge: news organizations, meme creators, professional groups, influencers, and so on. On my own feed, I see a meme about the Lord of the Rings, data from the census, an ad for earplugs, a video from a seamstress who recreates historical clothing, a picture of a cute cat, a post about some international news, a friend's vacation pictures, a post about the Canadian economy and inflation, an ad for men's soap, that's a weird one for me, a comedian riffing on that same piece of international news, and a list of, I'm using airquotes here, "good" and "bad" foods...

It's a mishmash labyrinth of people trying to inform us, entertain us, advertise to us... and mislead us. I know that I can trust the data from the census, but what about the rest? The soap is probably not dangerous, expensive and weirdly gendered, but not harmful, but the list of "good" and "bad" foods? The post about inflation? Were those reliable? And what about the news clip?

Today, we're talking about misinformation. And, heads up, I'm going to be using that as a bit of a catch-all term, but it's actually not so simple, as we'll soon see.

Timothy: My name is Timothy Caulfield. I'm a professor in the faculty of law and the school of public health at the University of Alberta.

Tegan: You dedicated your recent book, quote, "To science. Hang in there." Why?

Timothy: Oh, it's been a tough decade or two, hasn't it? There has been this growing sort of universal almost disdain for science, for scientific institutions. Now, I want to be clear, if you went out and we surveyed 1000 people, most people in Canada, in particular in Canada, would say they trust science and scientists, right? But that trust is starting to erode, especially if you start talking about particular topics.

So, a person might say, I trust science, but then you ask them, what about vaccines? What about climate change? What about supplements? What about unproven therapies of other kinds? So it's a very interesting time. So that's one of the reasons I dedicated the book to science. But the other reason is I feel like scientific institutions are under assault. And that's really heartbreaking because getting good evidence, having knowledge that is trustworthy is fundamentally important to liberal democracies and I think there's currently a crisis in that context.

Tegan: As I said before, I'll be using misinformation as a catch-all term, but it technically isn't. There are a few different kinds of bad information. As Timothy explains.

Timothy: I use misinformation as the catch-all phrase too, and not everyone agrees that that's a good strategy. It is actually sort of a complex environment out there, information environment. I call it the misinformation continuum.

So on one end, you have information that the purveyors know is a lie, it's clearly a lie, there's no evidence to support it, and it's being put forward to satisfy a particular agenda, to sell products. Tthat's disinformation, right? The incentive, the intent is to spread misinformation for a whole bunch of reasons, it may be, as I said, maybe political reasons, maybe to build a brand, etc. But, but the intent is to spread misinformation.

You move along that continuum, and we'll just maybe go in the middle of it. And you have individuals that—I put a lot of the wellness gurus in this category—you know, do they believe it? I don't know. It seems scientifically… Does a wellness guru really believe, you know, a colon cleanse helps you? Do they really believe that, you know, these supplements work? I don't know. I'm skeptical. Maybe they fooled themselves that they think it works, but it's still wrong. It's still misinformation. It still does harm.

And then if you move along that continuum a little bit further. You have individuals that, you know, genuinely believe they're doing what's best, you know, they just want what's best for themselves, for the family and their community, and they're spreading that, uh, incorrect information with no intent to do harm, right? Uh, but it's still misinformation, and it can still do harm.

So yeah, there's all these other levels throughout that continuum, and I think it is a complex environment, and that does matter because the nature of the misinformation may inform how we should tackle it.

Tegan: Hoaxes predate the internet. You know, the Cardiff Giant, the Fiji Mermaid, the Cottingley Fairies, which are my personal favourite. What makes modern misinformation special?

Timothy: Yeah, I love looking at those old hoaxes. You know, I do a lot of health misinformation, as you know, and I love looking at those old posters for bogus treatments.

Look, misinformation has been around forever. As soon as human beings started communicating, I'm sure there was misinformation, right? But it is different.

I think we can go back to say the 2016 election in the United States, where a lot of people think misinformation really started to take off and take on a different character. Further than that, it really is social media. Yeah, it's an obvious response, but social media really has changed it because it allowed the people to spread… You know, people in the past didn't really have access to ways to broadcast ideas, and the Internet allowed that to take off, right? Allowed the creation of echo chambers that allowed the creation of these communities that believe this stuff. So I think it really started to accelerate that.

The other thing I think it's happening now is that because the information environment has gotten so confusing, and also I think our knowledge environment has gotten so confusing, it's easier to find tokens of legitimacy to legitimize a position, to make a position seem more credible. For example, there's bad science out there that people can point to make their position seem more legitimate.

In addition to that, and one of the things I find really scary, is the degree to which misinformation has become ideological. Yes, it's always been there. You know, there's always been an ideological component to a lot of the misinformation. But that aspect is really accelerated too. And if you just look at it in the context of the health space, which is where I do my research, it's incredible how virtually everything now has an ideological component to it: whether you're talking about vaccines, whether you're talking about supplements, whether you're talking about unproven cures for things like autism. There's this ideological lens through which everything is now projected, and that's really scary because once something becomes about ideology it becomes much more difficult to change people's minds. It becomes part of their worldview, how they identify. And I think that that is something that is also different. Yeah, it it's always been there. But now it's just at the fore.

Tegan: According to a recent StatCan general social survey, the most common method for following news and current affairs was the internet followed by television. Could you talk about how the difference in access point affects everything?

Timothy: There's been a lot of recent research that has found a strong correlation between where you get your information and whether you believe misinformation and whether you share misinformation and yes, it really does matter. So, no surprise here, if you get your information from social media, you're more likely to believe misinformation, more likely to spread misinformation. If you get your news from the legacy media, you know, the kinds of sources, well-known newspapers, broadcasters that have been around for a long time, you're less likely to believe misinformation, less likely to share misinformation. Yes, this is very correlational, right? This is very correlational, and it's correlated to education and all those other… and socioeconomics and all those things. But it's still relevant because that speaks to the echo chambers. So where people get their information matters.

And there have even been studies that have shown there's a strong correlation between what cable news you watch and your beliefs around things like COVID therapies. In fact, one study came out this year, just a couple months ago, that found the strongest predictor of your belief around the efficacy of COVID treatments is what cable news show you watch. And in fact, so that, that's the public, but in fact, that stat holds also for physicians. So they studied physicians too. How horrifying is that? So they basically found that in the United States, your physician's position on COVID therapies is more influenced by the cable news show they watched than the science that they read. Just absolutely horrifying, right? And that really shows the degree to which this has become polarized and it's become about ideology and also where you get your information.

And the last thing I'll say about this—and I could go on and on—is I also think it speaks to the chaotic nature of our information environment, right? So if you're getting your information from social media platforms, from the Internet, there's a lot more information coming at you, right? Some of the… a platform like TikTok actually pushes information at you, right? Instagram's the same. I guess all the platforms have that to a degree. So we know that when you are bombarded with information, you're less likely to sort of look at it critically. And so we really need to think about how we can invite people to pause in that chaotic, frantic information environment to apply their critical thinking skills. When information is coming at you, it's just washing over you, it's playing to your cognitive biases, it's playing to your fears, and preconceived notions misinformation can really take hold, and so we've got to figure out strategies to push back against that.

Tegan: Could you talk about the nuts and bolts of social media? I'm talking about algorithms, echo chambers, and the role they play in information access for the average person.

Timothy: I think it's really important to recognize that… the idea is that the algorithms that drive search engines, the algorithms that drive virtually every social media platform, they're designed to exploit our cognitive biases. So there's been a lot of interesting work that talks about how they play to fearmongering, right? They play to your ideological leanings. They play to your desire for in-group signaling, right? So those algorithms, because of that, facilitate not only the spreading of misinformation, but the creation of echo chambers that legitimize and emphasize misinformation. All of the platforms, and I won't use any names, have said they're trying to tweak their algorithms to not to avoid that. But I think we definitely need more transparency about what's really going on with those algorithms.

You know, as individuals, as the public, we should recognize that those algorithms are designed to do that. You know, they're designed to get, in our attention economy, they're designed to get clicks, they're designed to get eyeballs, they're designed to engage you. And they do that by playing to our cognitive biases.

Look, as I said before, it impacts all of us. I have made mistakes or fallen, gone down, you know, a hole that I wouldn't have if I just paused for a moment and remembered that these algorithms are designed to kind of trick us.

Tegan: So many people get information in snippets: soundbites on social media, a headline in a notification on their smartphone. Why is it a problem when people rely on these tiny infobytes for their news?

Timothy: It is, I think, become the way that we get our news now, right? And sometimes I'm guilty of this, by the way. And I mean, there's been a lot of really interesting research about how people only read the headlines and how rare it is for people to click through the actual content, right? And we also know, as I was talking about before, that not pausing is,  not sort of trying to apply your critical thinking skills, is correlated with believing misinformation and spreading misinformation.

Um, and the other thing we need to remember is that the situation that you described, right? This frantic information environment. It also plays to our emotions, right? So it's a sort of a worst case scenario, right? Because we have these algorithms that now kind of know us, right? They kind of know us, and they're presenting you with headlines and content and images and memes that play to your preconceived notions, probably play to some degree to your ideology, right? And that means you're more likely to internalize it.

And so we need to invite people to pause, and people like Gordon Pennycook and David Rand at MIT, Gordon's at Cornell now, they've done really interesting research that have highlighted that value of just pausing. Just pausing for a moment, you're less likely to believe misinformation, less likely to share misinformation, and the other thing I think is really important is the degree to which that frantic clickbait kind of world that we live in, it also plays to our emotions. Really interesting work by people like Kate Starbird at University of Washington have… She suggests that if content makes you emotional, in particular, she once said to me, if it feels like, for example, your team got a touchdown, right? So you see a headline, "I knew it!" or… If it feels like your team got a touchdown, that shouldn't be... Your impulse shouldn't be to share it or to internalize it. Your impulse should be, "I should be skeptical. I should double check this. You know, when it makes me feel emotional, it makes me angry, fearful or that like my team just got a touchdown, that should be a signal to pause and to double check it." Because it's the algorithm playing to you, right? And don't fall for it. You know, take a pause and apply those critical thinking skills.

Tegan: That actually leads right into my next question, which was that in researching for this episode, I found time and time again, that misinformation was more likely to be reshared on social media if it was terrible news, the more dramatic, the more negative, the more shocking the headline, the more likely it was to be re shared. Could you talk about negativity bias and the role it plays in our attention?

Timothy: Yeah, I mean, there is a lot of really interesting research on that. And, and some of it very, very recent. There was a study that came out, gosh, I'm gonna say just a couple weeks ago, that backs up exactly what you just said. They looked at the role of the negativity bias in the sharing of misinformation in the context of COVID, and they found it to be a dominant factor, right? And we've known this for a very long time. Negative headlines outperform positive ones. There was a study that came out earlier this year that found that because of that, over the last couple decades, negative, scary, ominous headlines are increasing in frequency. And headlines that are related to joy—and that's actually what the study looked at, which is so depressing—headlines related to joy are decreasing in frequency, right? And that's all because of the negativity bias.

And the negativity bias, as you know well, is the idea that if something's scary, we're more likely to remember it, more likely to act on it, which makes total sense as a cognitive bias. For most of human history you want to remember the scary stuff, right? You know, tigers hang out over there, don't eat that berry. But it's backfiring now, right? And we have to remember that. There have been other studies that have looked at what kind of content goes viral, right? What kind of misinformation goes viral, right? And it's something that is scary that plays to our morals, and I would say that includes ideology, and it's easily processed, and so much of the misinformation that you can think of ticks all those boxes. And negativity, you know, being negative is a big one.

Now, what's interesting for those of us who are trying to counter misinformation that poses a challenge, right? Our own initiative hashtag science up first (#ScienceUpFirst), we're trying to counter misinformation in a positive way. We want to be constructive. We don't want to fall into that fearmongering trap. But when you're fighting the negativity bias, that can be challenging. I mean, there have been studies that have found that public health messages that have a little bit of a scary element to it do outperform those that are totally positive. So, you know, do you fight fire with fire or do you try to think of other creative strategies that can still make your content get traction, but aren't necessarily just adding to a negative worldview? I, I, I like the latter more than the former. Let's, let's try to be positive. The world needs some more positivity.

Tegan: What are some of the consequences of the idea that we should give both sides of an issue equal time or consideration?

Timothy: I don't think this is said enough, that our current information environment is a false balance machine. So what do I mean by that? Fringe views, contrarian views, tiny minority views, often views that aren't backed by good science are elevated in our information ecosystem to make them appear equivalent to the body of evidence, the scientific consensus. We see that happen with vaccines, with climate. Virtually any contentious topic that you can think of, this is happening.

There's been really interesting research, a study that came out of Europe that highlights the degree to which this is a problem. So what they did in this study is they asked thousands of people how much consensus is there in the medical community about the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines? And 90 percent of people said that the medical community was divided. And in fact, they said that the most common response, it was like 50/50. Right? And that 50 percent thought maybe they weren't safe and they weren't effective and... When the reality is over 90 percent thought that [they were safe] and a very small percentage had concerns. Think about that. 90 percent of people thought that there was a lack of consensus in the medical community.

And the problem is research has consistently shown that false balance can impact public perception, it can impact health behaviours, it can lead to vaccination hesitancy. So we have to do a better job presenting the scientific consensus to the community.

In fact, I think it's also really important to highlight talking about… The scientific consensus is not about group-think. It's not about not respecting, you know, controversial scientific positions, and often that's how doubt mongers try to portray the scientific consensus: "Oh, that's just sheeple. You know, that's just people that have bought into, um, a group think mentality." On the contrary, the scientists, scientists are always challenging the scientific consensus, and controversial views are incredibly important, but, but, but those scientific views have to be presented in scientific forums. It's about using science to support your position. And if you can do that, eventually your position will rise. The scientific consensus matters.

Okay, the last thing I'll say on this, now that you've wound me up is to back up what I've just said. This whole idea of the scientific consensus versus these fringe views is really only contentious on topics that have become political. No one worries about scientific consensus being not true when they board an airplane, and, by the way, these fringe views are our own research has found, are vastly overrepresented. They're not being silenced. They're not being censored. They're vastly overrepresented in the public sphere.

Tegan: StatCan is a producer and communicator of data. As such, it engages regularly in this public sphere, which, as we've just heard, is significantly more complex than it used to be: misinformation, disinformation, bad science, cluttered newsfeeds...

Maybe the chief statistician, Anil Arora, said it best at a keynote address in 2019:

Anil: When we are talking about Big Data, we need to recognize that volume does not

equal quality.

Tegan: Volume without quality equals information overload. StatCan's job is to get Canadians the information they need, so how does the organization navigate this information environment? We asked an expert .

Eric: Eric Rancourt, Assistant Chief Statistician and Chief Data Officer at Statistics Canada.

Tegan: How is StatCan thinking about the information tsunami that Canadians are facing, especially knowing that there are bad actors intentionally putting disinformation out there to mislead us?

Eric: It's a big change in the context. Traditionally organizations like Statistics Canada have been operating in a mode where we control the information: we survey, we gather information. That is why we have a modernization plan, a modernization mindset, where we constantly try to be closer to what are the needs of people and how can we be at the leading-edge of using methods so that this new context we understand and we can scientifically perform there. So there might be some mis- or disinformation, but organizations like Statistics Canada, we, are designed to counter that by the way in which we scientifically produce information.

Tegan: Disinformation and misinformation are eroding Canadians' trust. What are some of the consequences if Canadians don't know who to trust?

Eric: We all want people to be autonomous and free. So, if the information that one has to make a decision is not depicting exactly what is the world, then are you really free and taking a clear decision if the information on which you base your decision is not reflecting society and the world? Probably not. So it is very important to make sure that we use very well-established methods, that this be transparent to the users so they can know and they can trust that the information that they use is depicting society.

Tegan: Why is trust crucial for StatCan specifically?

Eric: This is the basis of a statistical system. We cannot just produce information on our own. It starts with Canadians providing us the data pieces that make up the information that we then produce. So I always like to talk about the data life cycle as gather, guard, grow, give. So we gather information, Canadians provide us the data. We guard it well; we safeguard the information. Then we grow it by integrating the information, producing estimates, and then at the end, we give back information. So the trust starts with Canadians trusting us with the data they provide, and then we use leading-edge methods. We use a scientific approach. We haveapproaches based on the necessity of the information and how proportional what we do is to that necessity. And then we make access to the data. And that whole system, the whole national statistical system is founded on trust.

Tegan: If misinformation sows mistrust, it threatens much more than our national statistical system. So... why? Why would someone intentionally spread disinformation? I put that question to Timothy.

Tegan: Who benefits from misinformation?

Timothy: Yeah. I mean, that's a, that's a great question. And I get it a lot because, you know, people say, "well, you know what, why do anti-vaxxers push this stuff? Why are people trying to create doubt around the nature of climate change?" Well, you know, very often there's money involved. There really is money involved. So, there have been interesting studies that have looked at the degree to which those spreading misinformation profit. So, just to give an example, many anti-vaxxers are also selling supplements or they're selling some other health product. They're selling products often on the back of creating fear around things like vaccines.

Tegan: Who's most vulnerable in this conversation?

Timothy: You know, I think we're all vulnerable. I think that our institutions are vulnerable. I also think that the spread of misinformation and all the things that we've talked about can also polarize our communities in ways that make equity issues more profound. I think there are certain communities that are potentially more vulnerable. I think we're all vulnerable to the spread and harm of misinformation, and I think that that is a really important point that we shouldn't forget. I mean, this impacts all of us. It impacts our healthcare institutions, it impacts healthcare providers, it impacts patients, it impacts populations, it impacts communities. We need to remember that when we're developing strategies to counter misinformation.

Tegan: I put the same question to Eric to answer from a statistical and a data perspective, and he stressed one of Timothy's points.

Who's most vulnerable in this conversation?

Eric: It's, it's everyone, but in particular, it's the small groups. The general population is, is one thing. It's relatively easy to produce information on the total, the average, but there are subgroups of the population, those that are sometimes missed by the general information found on the internet, who are particularly at risk. So major efforts are made by organizations like Statistics Canada to produce disaggregated information in scientific ways that can ensure that there's no bias against or for any group, so that there's no harm done.

Tegan: Knowing that there is a lot of bad information out there. What is StatCan doing about it?

Eric: We are nurturing and developing the skill set of our experts so that it does meet the needs of the digital world and ever-changing society.

We make sure to occupy the space. So, wherever there's data discussions, data information, we participate at the discussion table, at the decision-making tables, to enable those decisions by providing very relevant information.

And lastly, we also team up. This is not just something that Statistics Canada does on its own. We team up with the other departments of the federal family. For example, there's a data strategy for the federal public service that has been launched this year, earlier this year, and Statistics Canada is a major player on that. And we also team up on the international level. We participate in the United Nations statistical activities, in the Conference of European Statisticians, the OECD. These are groups that look at what are the situations faced in different countries. So, it is really in the best interest of all to team up and tackle that as a group rather than just one institution.

Tegan: So, you could say that we're fighting bad information by making sure there is good information out there that Canadians can access.

Eric: Yes, we were trying to create a reliable data space that is greater in importance than the dark cloud of misinformation.

Tegan: What's the role of good, high-quality research and data in the fight against misinformation?

Timothy: I actually think there is a little bit of a knowledge creation crisis right now. I really feel that liberal democracies around the world should make the creation of trustworthy science a priority. What do I mean by that? There is there's a replication crisis that's going on. There's predatory journals that are polluting our knowledge ecosystem. There's zombie papers. (So, these are retracted papers that would just won't go away that are still getting cited.) You know we need to create trustworthy, independent science that is distributed in a way that the public can feel confident about it. And this absolutely is essential in the fight against misinformation, to inform our policies, and to create trust within the community more broadly.

Tegan: What tips do you have for someone who wants to stay informed but who doesn't know how to navigate this landscape?

Timothy: There are strategies that can be used. You know, we've talked about a couple of them.

First of all, pause. That simple strategy really can make a difference. I believe that trying to slow down your information environment a little bit, you know, slow down that bombardment.

The other thing we need to do is we need to get people, I think to understand the evidence, the nature of evidence better. An anecdote is not the same thing as well-done studies. And just teaching people that very straightforward thing, I think and research backs us up, can really make a difference. And that's something that you can deploy day to day, right? Just asking, okay, where's this evidence come from? Right? I also think that as things like AI become more common, we are going to have to really invite people to use fact-checking skills even more. And that's sort of where, you know, that being pessimistic, my lead in, um, comes in, you know, it's, it's hard enough right now to get people to fact check, to pause, but with AI, I think it, it heightens that need even further, right? You really do need to investigate a little bit more. How legitimate is this image? How legitimate are these claims? And people need to do that, to use those fact checking strategies even more now, and unfortunately, it's just going to get worse in the in in the future. More broadly, I think, I'm a big advocate of teaching critical-thinking skills throughout our education system from, you know, kindergarten right to the end of university and for adults too. We should have resources available for adults throughout the lifespan.

Tegan: What makes a source of information reliable? If you take the census, for example, what differentiates something like the census from other sources of information that Canadians might find, especially online?

Eric: First of all, it's the fact that it is produced by a trusted organization. So the source of the data, in this case, Statistics Canada, the transparency about the whole process, how we design it, which methods we use, how we consult, everything we do about the census is made available uh, to, to the users. So, transparency is key. And another aspect is the scientific aspect. The methods we use in our programs, such as the census, are published methods. And sometimes they are published in scientific journals,  journals that have been peer reviewed.

Tegan: Number one: Ask yourself, who is producing this information and why?

Eric: What is the source? Is it a recognized source or is it a national statistical organization like Statistics Canada? Is it a university? Or is it some just private website of some sort?

Tegan: Are they transparent?

Eric: One has to seek evidence of transparency, as I said, so are the methods readily available or is that hidden and nowhere to be found?

Tegan: What can you find about their methodology? Can you ring them up and ask questions? Can they back up their claims?

Eric: And if they actually know, then they can correct it or deny, but one should not hesitate to double check somewhere or contact the organization that has produced the information.

Tegan: If you don't know for sure, be mindful of what you share. It could be misinformation.

Eric: What people should do also is not proliferate, transfer of the information when it's unclear where it comes from.

Tegan: Other than not spreading misinformation, how else can Canadians help StatCan fight misinformation?

Eric: One way to participate and contribute is to provide information to Statistics Canada and respond to surveys. That enables Statistics Canada to produce very solid information in return to citizens in ways that are consumable for decision making.

Tegan: It can't be said enough. StatCan produces high quality data worthy of your trust. That's invaluable in this information environment, but the agency relies on you, puts its trust in you, to create it.

Tegan: If someone would like to learn more about your work, where should they go?

Timothy: Well, I'm easy to find online. I'm on a variety of social media platforms: @CaulfieldTim. That's where you can find my noise and we have our own misinformation project called hashtag science up first, where we try to counter misinformation and talk about science literacy and media literacy in a very constructive, positive way, using diverse voices from across Canada. So please come be part of the ScienceUpFirst team.

Tegan: If someone would like to learn more, where can they go?

Eric: I would start with Statistics Canada's website. The Trust Centre is really a place where you will learn what do we do, what are we planning, what sort of data collection are we planning, and if more is needed, then there is information on who to contact.

Tegan: You've been listening to Eh Sayers. Thank you to Timothy Caulfield and Eric Rancourt for taking the time to speak with us.

You can subscribe to this show wherever you get your podcasts. There, you can also find the French version of our show, called Hé-coutez bien! If you liked this show, please rate, review, and subscribe.

One more thing! If you've enjoyed hearing the stories behind the numbers on our podcast, you can get even more by downloading our newest mobile app, StatsCAN. Access the latest publications and get notified when there's new information relevant to your interests, like agriculture and food, health, or science and technology. The StatsCAN app is available for free in the Apple and Google app stores. Check it out!

And thanks for listening!

Sources

Statistics Canada. "Media Consumption in Canada: Are Canadians in the Know?" Statistics Canada. Government of Canada, March 28, 2023.

"Statistics Canada's Trust Centre." Statistics Canada. Government of Canada, February 7, 2023.

Monthly Coke Supply and Disposition Survey - 2024

Why are we conducting this survey?

This survey is conducted by Statistics Canada in order to collect the necessary information to support the Integrated Business Statistics Program (IBSP). This program combines various survey and administrative data to develop comprehensive measures of the Canadian economy.

The statistical information from the IBSP serves many purposes, including:

  • Obtaining information on the supply of, and/or demand for, energy in Canada
  • Enabling governmental agencies to fulfill their regulatory responsibilities in regards to public utilities
  • Enabling all levels of government to establish informed policies in the energy area
  • Assisting the business community in the corporate decision-making process.

Your information may also be used by Statistics Canada for other statistical and research purposes.

Your participation in this survey is required under the authority of the Statistics Act.

Other important information

Authorization to collect this information

Data are collected under the authority of the Statistics Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, Chapter S-19.

Confidentiality

By law, Statistics Canada is prohibited from releasing any information it collects that could identify any person, business, or organization, unless consent has been given by the respondent, or as permitted by the Statistics Act. Statistics Canada will use the information from this survey for statistical purposes only.

Record linkages

To enhance the data from this survey and to reduce the reporting burden, Statistics Canada may combine the acquired data with information from other surveys or from administrative sources.

Data-sharing agreements

To reduce respondent burden, Statistics Canada has entered into data-sharing agreements with provincial and territorial statistical agencies and other government organizations, which have agreed to keep the data confidential and use them only for statistical purposes. Statistics Canada will only share data from this survey with those organizations that have demonstrated a requirement to use the data.

Section 11 of the Statistics Act provides for the sharing of information with provincial and territorial statistical agencies that meet certain conditions. These agencies must have the legislative authority to collect the same information, on a mandatory basis, and the legislation must provide substantially the same provisions for confidentiality and penalties for disclosure of confidential information as the Statistics Act. Because these agencies have the legal authority to compel businesses to provide the same information, consent is not requested and businesses may not object to the sharing of the data.

For this survey, there are Section 11 agreements with the provincial and territorial statistical agencies of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and the Yukon. The shared data will be limited to information pertaining to business establishments located within the jurisdiction of the respective province or territory.

Section 12 of the Statistics Act provides for the sharing of information with federal, provincial or territorial government organizations. Under Section 12, you may refuse to share your information with any of these organizations by writing a letter of objection to the Chief Statistician, specifying the organizations with which you do not want Statistics Canada to share your data and mailing it to the following address:

Chief Statistician of Canada
Statistics Canada
Attention of Director, Enterprise Statistics Division
150 Tunney's Pasture Driveway
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0T6

You may also contact us by email at statcan.esdhelpdesk-dsebureaudedepannage.statcan@statcan.gc.ca or by fax at 613-951-6583.

For this survey, there are Section 12 agreements with the statistical agencies of Prince Edward Island, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut as well as with the provincial and territorial government ministries responsible for the energy sector, the Canada Energy Regulator, Natural Resources Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada.

For a complete list of the provincial and territorial government ministries responsible for the energy sector, you can visit the following link: Information for survey participants

For agreements with provincial and territorial government organizations, the shared data will be limited to information pertaining to business establishments located within the jurisdiction of the respective province or territory.

Business or organization and contact information

1. Verify or provide the business or organization's legal and operating name and correct where needed.

Note: Legal name modifications should only be done to correct a spelling error or typo.

Legal Name

The legal name is one recognized by law, thus it is the name liable for pursuit or for debts incurred by the business or organization. In the case of a corporation, it is the legal name as fixed by its charter or the statute by which the corporation was created.

Modifications to the legal name should only be done to correct a spelling error or typo.

To indicate a legal name of another legal entity you should instead indicate it in question 3 by selecting 'Not currently operational' and then choosing the applicable reason and providing the legal name of this other entity along with any other requested information.

Operating Name

The operating name is a name the business or organization is commonly known as if different from its legal name. The operating name is synonymous with trade name.

  • Legal name
  • Operating name (if applicable)

2. Verify or provide the contact information of the designated business or organization contact person for this questionnaire and correct where needed.

Note: The designated contact person is the person who should receive this questionnaire. The designated contact person may not always be the one who actually completes the questionnaire.

  • First name
  • Last name
  • Title
  • Preferred language of communication
    • English
    • French
  • Mailing address (number and street)
  • City
  • Province, territory or state
  • Postal code or ZIP code
  • Country
    • Canada
    • United States
  • Email address
  • Telephone number (including area code)
  • Extension number (if applicable)
    The maximum number of characters is 5.
  • Fax number (including area code)

3. Verify or provide the current operational status of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

  • Operational
  • Not currently operational (e.g., temporarily or permanently closed, change of ownership)
    Why is this business or organization not currently operational?
    • Seasonal operations
      • When did this business or organization close for the season?
        • Date
      • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
        • Date
    • Ceased operations
      • When did this business or organization cease operations?
        • Date
      • Why did this business or organization cease operations?
        • Bankruptcy
        • Liquidation
        • Dissolution
        • Other
      • Specify the other reasons why the operations ceased
    • Sold operations
      • When was this business or organization sold?
        • Date
      • What is the legal name of the buyer?
    • Amalgamated with other businesses or organizations
      • When did this business or organization amalgamate?
        • Date
      • What is the legal name of the resulting or continuing business or organization?
      • What are the legal names of the other amalgamated businesses or organizations?
    • Temporarily inactive but will re-open
      • When did this business or organization become temporarily inactive?
        • Date
      • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
        • Date
      • Why is this business or organization temporarily inactive?
    • No longer operating due to other reasons
      • When did this business or organization cease operations?
        • Date
      • Why did this business or organization cease operations?

4. Verify or provide the current main activity of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

Note: The described activity was assigned using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).

This question verifies the business or organization's current main activity as classified by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The NAICS is an industry classification system developed by the statistical agencies of Canada, Mexico and the United States. Created against the background of the North American Free Trade Agreement, it is designed to provide common definitions of the industrial structure of the three countries and a common statistical framework to facilitate the analysis of the three economies. NAICS is based on supply-side or production-oriented principles, to ensure that industrial data, classified to NAICS, are suitable for the analysis of production-related issues such as industrial performance.

The target entity for which NAICS is designed are businesses and other organizations engaged in the production of goods and services. They include farms, incorporated and unincorporated businesses and government business enterprises. They also include government institutions and agencies engaged in the production of marketed and non-marketed services, as well as organizations such as professional associations and unions and charitable or non-profit organizations and the employees of households.

The associated NAICS should reflect those activities conducted by the business or organizational units targeted by this questionnaire only, as identified in the 'Answering this questionnaire' section and which can be identified by the specified legal and operating name. The main activity is the activity which most defines the targeted business or organization's main purpose or reason for existence. For a business or organization that is for-profit, it is normally the activity that generates the majority of the revenue for the entity.

The NAICS classification contains a limited number of activity classes; the associated classification might be applicable for this business or organization even if it is not exactly how you would describe this business or organization's main activity.

Please note that any modifications to the main activity through your response to this question might not necessarily be reflected prior to the transmitting of subsequent questionnaires and as a result they may not contain this updated information.

The following is the detailed description including any applicable examples or exclusions for the classification currently associated with this business or organization.

Description and examples

  • This is the current main activity.
  • This is not the current main activity.

Please provide a brief but precise description of this business or organization's main activity.

e.g., breakfast cereal manufacturing, shoe store, software development

Main activity

5. You indicated that is not the current main activity.

Was this business or organization's main activity ever classified as: ?

  • Yes
    When did the main activity change?
    • Date
  • No

6. Search and select the industry classification code that best corresponds to this business or organization's main activity.

How to search:

  • if desired, you can filter the search results by first selecting this business or organization's activity sector
  • enter keywords or a brief description that best describes this business or organization main activity
  • press the Search button to search the database for an activity that best matches the keywords or description you provided
  • then select an activity from the list.

Select this business or organization's activity sector (optional)

  • Farming or logging operation
  • Construction company or general contractor
  • Manufacturer
  • Wholesaler
  • Retailer
  • Provider of passenger or freight transportation
  • Provider of investment, savings or insurance products
  • Real estate agency, real estate brokerage or leasing company
  • Provider of professional, scientific or technical services
  • Provider of health care or social services
  • Restaurant, bar, hotel, motel or other lodging establishment
  • Other sector

Method of collection

1. Indicate whether you will be answering the remaining questions or attaching files with the required information.

  • Answering the remaining questions
  • Attaching files

Coal imported from foreign countries

1. Did this business import coal from foreign countries?

  • Yes
  • No

2. What was the volume of coal imported from foreign countries?

Please report the volume of all coal imported from foreign countries during the reference month, in metric tonnes.

  • Metric tonnes

Coal purchased or received from Canadian (domestic) companies

3. Did this business purchase or receive coal from Canadian (domestic) companies?

  • Yes
  • No

4. From which provinces or territories did this business purchase or receive coal?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

5. What was the volume of coal purchased or received from the following provinces or territories?

  • Purchased during the month

Report the amounts of coal purchased or received during the reference month from Canadian (domestic) companies, by province and territory.

What was the volume of coal purchased or received from the following provinces or territories?
  Metric tonnes
a. Newfoundland and Labrador  
b. Prince Edward Island  
c. Nova Scotia  
d. New Brunswick  
e. Quebec  
f. Ontario  
g. Manitoba  
h. Saskatchewan  
i. Alberta  
j. British Columbia  
k. Yukon  
l. Northwest Territories  
m. Nunavut  
Total volume of coal purchased or received from all provinces or territories  

Opening inventory of coal for the month

6. This opening inventory is last month's closing inventory as provided by this business for coal on site and in transit.

Please review the value and if needed, make any modification.

When opening inventory is blank, please provide the opening inventory.

  • Opening inventory

Report the total amount of Canadian and imported coal at the beginning of the month. This should equal the stock at the end of the month from the previous month's report.

  • Metric tonnes

Disposition of coal for business's own use

7. What was the volume of coal used by this business for its own use?

What was the volume of coal used by this business for its own use?
  Metric tonnes
a. Volume of coal charged to coke ovens  
b. Volume of pulverized coal injection (PCI) used in blast furnaces  
c. All other business fuel uses for coal  
Total disposition of coal for business's own use  

Summary of total supply of coal for the month of [month]

8. This is a summary of the total supply of coal for the month of [month].

This opening inventory is last month's closing inventory as provided by this business. Correct if needed.

  • Inventory adjustments

Coal inventory adjustments includes, for example, washer losses, etc.

This is a summary of the total supply of coal for the month of [month].
  Metric tonnes
Opening inventory of coal on site and in transit  
Volume of coal imported from foreign countries  
Volume of coal purchased or received  
Total supply of coal for the month of [month]  
Total disposition of coal for business's own use  
Closing coal inventories before inventory adjustments  
Inventory adjustments  
Closing coal inventories after inventory adjustments  

Coke production

9. What was the volume of coke produced by this business?

Produced during the month

Report the amount of coke produced in your own plants during the month.

  • Metric tonnes

Coke imported from foreign countries

10. Did this business import coke from foreign countries?

  • Yes
  • No

11. What was the volume of coke imported from foreign countries?

  • Coke imported

Please report the total amount of coke imported from foreign countries.

  • Metric tonnes

Coke purchased or received from Canadian (domestic) companies

12. Did this business purchase or receive coke from Canadian (domestic) companies?

  • Yes
  • No

13. From which provinces or territories did this business purchase or receive coke?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

14. What was the volume of coke purchased or received from the following provinces or territories?

Please report the total amount of coke received or purchased from Canadian companies by province.

Please report for the mine location indicated at the start of this questionnaire.

What was the volume of coke purchased or received from the following provinces or territories?
  Metric tonnes
a. Newfoundland and Labrador  
b. Prince Edward Island  
c. Nova Scotia  
d. New Brunswick  
e. Quebec  
f. Ontario  
g. Manitoba  
h. Saskatchewan  
i. Alberta  
j. British Columbia  
k. Yukon  
l. Northwest Territories  
m. Nunavut  
Total volume of coke purchased or received from all provinces or territories  

Opening inventory of coke for the month

15. This opening inventory is last month's closing inventory as provided by this business for coke on site and in transit.

Please review the value and if needed, make any modification.

When opening inventory is blank, please provide the opening inventory.

Opening inventory

Report the total amount of coke in stock at the beginning of the month.

Stock of coke at the beginning of the month should be equal to the closing stock from the previous month.

  • Metric tonnes

16. What was the average calorific value of the total supply of coke?

Average Calorific Value

Please report the net average calorific value of coke produced in megajoules per metric tonne.

  • Megajoules per metric tonne

Total disposition of coke consumed for business's own use

17. What was the volume of coke used by this business for its own use?

Used in blast furnaces

Report the amount of coke (produced or purchased) used in blast furnaces during the month for business's own use.

Used in 'associated works'

Report the amount of coke (produced or purchased) used in other 'associated works' during the month for business's own use.

What was the volume of coke used by this business for its own use?
  Metric tonnes
a. Volume of coke used in blast furnaces  
b. Volume of coke used in 'associated works'  
Total disposition of coke for business's own use  

Sales by types of customer

18. Did this business sell or deliver coke to Canadian (domestic) companies?

e.g., other coke plants, mining and oil, wholesalers or distributors.

  • Yes
  • No

19. This business sold or delivered coke to which types of customer?

Exclude sales for the purpose of resale.

Select all that apply.

  • Manufacturers
    • e.g., other types of coke plants, associated works
  • Other coke producers or domestic companies
    • e.g., wholesalers or distributors
  • All other types of customer
    Specify all other types of customers
    • e.g., mining, oil and gas extraction.

20. This business indicated that coke was sold or delivered to manufacturers. To which provinces or territories did this business sell or deliver coke?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

21. What was the volume of coke sold or delivered to manufacturers for the following provinces or territories?

What was the volume of coke sold or delivered to manufacturers for the following provinces or territories?
  Metric tonnes
a. Newfoundland and Labrador  
b. Prince Edward Island  
c. Nova Scotia  
d. New Brunswick  
e. Quebec  
f. Ontario  
g. Manitoba  
h. Saskatchewan  
i. Alberta  
j. British Columbia  
k. Yukon  
l. Northwest Territories  
m. Nunavut  
Total volume of coke sold or delivered to manufacturers  

22. This business indicated that coke was sold or delivered to other producers or domestic companies. To which provinces or territories did this business sell or deliver coke?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

23. What was the volume of coke sold or delivered to other producers or domestic companies for the following provinces or territories?

What was the volume of coke sold or delivered to other producers or domestic companies for the following provinces or territories?
  Metric tonnes
a. Newfoundland and Labrador  
b. Prince Edward Island  
c. Nova Scotia  
d. New Brunswick  
e. Quebec  
f. Ontario  
g. Manitoba  
h. Saskatchewan  
i. Alberta  
j. British Columbia  
k. Yukon  
l. Northwest Territories  
m. Nunavut  
Total volume of coke sold or delivered to other producers or domestic companies  

24. This business indicated that coke was sold or delivered to [other type of customer]. To which provinces or territories did this business sell or deliver coke?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

25. What was the total volume of coke sold or delivered to [other type of customer] for the following provinces or territories?

What was the total volume of coke sold or delivered to [other type of customer] for the following provinces or territories?
  Metric tonnes
a. Newfoundland and Labrador  
b. Prince Edward Island  
c. Nova Scotia  
d. New Brunswick  
e. Quebec  
f. Ontario  
g. Manitoba  
h. Saskatchewan  
i. Alberta  
j. British Columbia  
k. Yukon  
l. Northwest Territories  
m. Nunavut  
Total volume of coke sold or delivered to all other types of customer  

Export of coke to foreign countries

26. Did this business export coke to foreign countries?

  • Yes
  • No

Export of coke to foreign countries

27. What was the volume of coke exported to foreign countries?

Sold for export

Report the total amount of coke sold for export during the month.

  • Metric tonnes

Sale of coke to other Canadian companies for resale

28. Did this business deliver or sell coke to other Canadian companies for the purpose of resale?

Exclude storage.

  • Yes
  • No

29. To which provinces or territories did this business deliver or sell coke for the purpose of resale?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

30. What were the volume and value of coke delivered or sold to other Canadian companies for the purpose of resale from the following provinces or territories?

What were the volume and value of coke delivered or sold to other Canadian companies for the purpose of resale from the following provinces or territories?
  Metric tonnes CAN$ '000
a. Newfoundland and Labrador    
b. Prince Edward Island    
c. Nova Scotia    
d. New Brunswick    
e. Quebec    
f. Ontario    
g. Manitoba    
h. Saskatchewan    
i. Alberta    
j. British Columbia    
k. Yukon    
l. Northwest Territories    
m. Nunavut    
Total volume and value of coke delivered or sold for resale    

Summary of total supply of coke for the month of [month]

31. This is a summary of the total supply of coke for the month of [month].

This opening inventory is last month's closing inventory as provided by this business. Correct if needed.

  • Inventory adjustments

Please report coke inventory adjustments which would include, for example, wasted or scrapped coke.

This is a summary of the total supply of coke for the month of [month].
  Metric tonnes
Opening inventory of coke on site and in transit  
Volume of coke produced by this business  
Volume of coke imported from foreign countries  
Volume of coke purchased or received  
Total volume of coke delivered by type of customer  
Total supply of coke for the month of [month]  
Total disposition of coke for business's own use  
Total volume of coke exported  
Total volume of coke delivered or sold for resale  
Total disposition of coke for the month of [month]  
Closing coke inventories before inventory adjustments  
Inventory adjustments  
Closing coke inventories after inventory adjustments  

Changes or events

32. Indicate any changes or events that affected the reported values for this business or organization, compared with the last reporting period.

Select all that apply.

  • Strike or lock-out
  • Exchange rate impact
  • Price changes in goods or services sold
  • Contracting out
  • Organizational change
  • Price changes in labour or raw materials
  • Natural disaster
  • Recession
  • Change in product line
  • Sold business units
  • Expansion
  • New/lost contract
  • Plant closures
  • Acquisition of business units
  • Other - specify the other changes or events:
  • No changes or events

Contact person

33. Statistics Canada may need to contact the person who completed this questionnaire for further information.

Is Provided Given Names, Provided Family Name the best person to contact?

  • Yes
  • No

Who is the best person to contact about this questionnaire?

  • First name
  • Last name
  • Title
  • Email address
  • Telephone number (including area code)
  • Extension number (if applicable)
    The maximum number of characters is 5.
  • Fax number (including area code)

Feedback

34. How long did it take to complete this questionnaire?

Include the time spent gathering the necessary information.

  • Hours
  • Minutes

35. Do you have any comments about this questionnaire?

Enter your comments

Why are we conducting this survey?

This survey is conducted by Statistics Canada in order to collect the necessary information to support the Integrated Business Statistics Program (IBSP). This program combines various survey and administrative data to develop comprehensive measures of the Canadian economy.

The statistical information from the IBSP serves many purposes, including

  • Obtaining information on the supply of and/or demand for energy in Canada
  • Enabling governmental agencies to fulfill their regulatory responsibilities in regards to public utilities
  • Enabling all levels of government to establish informed policies in the energy area
  • Assisting the business community in the corporate decision-making process.

Your information may also be used by Statistics Canada for other statistical and research purposes.

Your participation in this survey is required under the authority of the Statistics Act.

Other important information

Authorization to collect this information

Data are collected under the authority of the Statistics Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, Chapter S-19.

Confidentiality

By law, Statistics Canada is prohibited from releasing any information it collects that could identify any person, business, or organization, unless consent has been given by the respondent, or as permitted by the Statistics Act. Statistics Canada will use the information from this survey for statistical purposes only.

Record linkages

To enhance the data from this survey and to reduce the reporting burden, Statistics Canada may combine the acquired data with information from other surveys or from administrative sources.

Data-sharing agreements

To reduce respondent burden, Statistics Canada has entered into data-sharing agreements with provincial and territorial statistical agencies and other government organizations, which have agreed to keep the data confidential and use them only for statistical purposes. Statistics Canada will only share data from this survey with those organizations that have demonstrated a requirement to use the data.

Section 11 of the Statistics Act provides for the sharing of information with provincial and territorial statistical agencies that meet certain conditions. These agencies must have the legislative authority to collect the same information, on a mandatory basis, and the legislation must provide substantially the same provisions for confidentiality and penalties for disclosure of confidential information as the Statistics Act. Because these agencies have the legal authority to compel businesses to provide the same information, consent is not requested and businesses may not object to the sharing of the data.

For this survey, there are Section 11 agreements with the provincial and territorial statistical agencies of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Québec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and the Yukon. The shared data will be limited to information pertaining to business establishments located within the jurisdiction of the respective province or territory.

Section 12 of the Statistics Act provides for the sharing of information with federal, provincial or territorial government organizations. Under Section 12, you may refuse to share your information with any of these organizations by writing a letter of objection to the Chief Statistician, specifying the organizations with which you do not want Statistics Canada to share your data and mailing it to the following address:

Chief Statistician of Canada
Statistics Canada
Attention of Director, Enterprise Statistics Division
150 Tunney's Pasture Driveway
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0T6

You may also contact us by email at statcan.esd-helpdesk-dse-bureaudedepannage.statcan@canada.ca or by fax at 613-951-6583.

For this survey, there are Section 12 agreements with the statistical agencies of Prince Edward Island, Northwest Territories and Nunavut as well as with the provincial government ministries responsible for the energy sector, the Canada Energy Regulator, Natural Resources Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada.

For a complete list of the provincial and territorial government ministries responsible for the energy sector, you can visit the following link: Information for participants.

For agreements with provincial and territorial government organizations, the shared data will be limited to information pertaining to business establishments located within the jurisdiction of the respective province or territory.

1. Verify or provide the business or organization's legal and operating name, and correct where needed.

Note: Legal name should only be modified to correct a spelling error or typo.

Note: Press the help button (?) for additional information.

Legal Name

The legal name is one recognized by law, thus it is the name liable for pursuit or for debts incurred by the business or organization. In the case of a corporation, it is the legal name as fixed by its charter or the statute by which the corporation was created.

Modifications to the legal name should only be done to correct a spelling error or typo.

To indicate a legal name of another legal entity you should instead indicate it in question 3 by selecting 'Not currently operational' and then choosing the applicable reason and providing the legal name of this other entity along with any other requested information.

Operating Name

The operating name is a name the business or organization is commonly known as if different from its legal name. The operating name is synonymous with trade name.

  • Legal name
  • Operating name (if applicable)

2. Verify or provide the contact information for the designated contact person for the business or organization and correct information if needed.

Note: The designated contact person is the person who should receive this questionnaire. The designated contact person may not always be the one who actually completes the questionnaire.

  • First name
  • Last name
  • Title
  • Preferred language of communication
    • English
    • French
  • Mailing address (number and street)
  • City
  • Province, territory or state
  • Postal code or ZIP code
  • Country
    • Canada
    • United States
  • Email address
  • Telephone number (including area code)
  • Extension number (if applicable)
    The maximum number of characters is 10.
  • Fax number (including area code)

3. Verify or provide the current operational status of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

  • Operational
  • Not currently operational (e.g., temporarily or permanently closed, change of ownership)
    Why is this business or organization not currently operational?
    • Seasonal operations
      • When did this business or organization close for the season?
        • Date
      • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
        • Date
    • Ceased operations
      • When did this business or organization cease operations?
        • Date
      • Why did this business or organization cease operations?
        • Bankruptcy
        • Liquidation
        • Dissolution
        • Other
      • Specify the other reasons why the operations ceased
    • Sold operations
      • When was this business or organization sold?
        • Date
      • What is the legal name of the buyer?
    • Amalgamated with other businesses or organizations
      • When did this business or organization amalgamate?
        • Date
      • What is the legal name of the resulting or continuing business or organization?
      • What are the legal names of the other amalgamated businesses or organizations?
    • Temporarily inactive but expected to re-open
      • When did this business or organization become temporarily inactive?
        • Date
      • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
        • Date
      • Why is this business or organization temporarily inactive?
    • No longer operating due to other reasons
      • When did this business or organization cease operations?
        • Date
      • Why did this business or organization cease operations?

4. Verify or provide the current main activity of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

Note: The described activity was assigned using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).

Note: Press the help button (?) for additional information, including a detailed description of this activity with example activities and any applicable exclusions.

This question verifies the business or organization's current main activity as classified by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The (NAICS) is an industry classification system developed by the statistical agencies of Canada, Mexico and the United States. Created against the background of the North American Free Trade Agreement, it is designed to provide common definitions of the industrial structure of the three countries and a common statistical framework to facilitate the analysis of the three economies. NAICS is based on supply-side or production-oriented principles, to ensure that industrial data, classified to NAICS, are suitable for the analysis of production-related issues such as industrial performance.

The target entity for which NAICS is designed are businesses and other organizations engaged in the production of goods and services. They include farms, incorporated and unincorporated businesses and government business enterprises. They also include government institutions and agencies engaged in the production of marketed and non-marketed services, as well as organizations such as professional associations and unions and charitable or non-profit organizations and the employees of households.

The associated NAICS should reflect those activities conducted by the business or organizational units targeted by this questionnaire only, as identified in the 'Answering this questionnaire' section and which can be identified by the specified legal and operating name. The main activity is the activity which most defines the targeted business or organization's main purpose or reason for existence. For a business or organization that is for-profit, it is normally the activity that generates the majority of the revenue for the entity.

The NAICS classification contains a limited number of activity classes; the associated classification might be applicable for this business or organization even if it is not exactly how you would describe this business or organization's main activity.

Please note that any modifications to the main activity through your response to this question might not necessarily be reflected prior to the transmitting of subsequent questionnaires and as a result they may not contain this updated information.

The following is the detailed description including any applicable examples or exclusions for the classification currently associated with this business or organization.

Description and examples

  • This is the current main activity
  • This is not the current main activity
    • Provide a brief but precise description of this business or organization's main activity
    • e.g., breakfast cereal manufacturing, shoe store, software development

Main activity

5. You indicated that is not the current main activity.

Was this business or organization's main activity ever classified as: ?

  • Yes
    • When did the main activity change?
    • Date
  • No

6. Search and select the industry activity classification that best corresponds to this business or organization's main activity.

How to search:

  • If desired, you can filter the search results by first selecting the business or organization's activity sector
  • Enter keywords or a brief description that best describe the business or organization's main activity
  • Press the Search button to search the database for an industry activity classification that best matches the keywords or description you provided
  • Select an industry activity classification from the list.

Select this business or organization's activity sector (optional):

  • Farming or logging operation
  • Construction company or general contractor
  • Manufacturer
  • Wholesaler
  • Retailer
  • Provider of passenger or freight transportation
  • Provider of investment, savings or insurance products
  • Real estate agency, real estate brokerage or leasing company
  • Provider of professional, scientific or technical services
  • Provider of health care or social services
  • Restaurant, bar, hotel, motel or other lodging establishment
  • Other sector

Method of collection

1. Indicate whether you will be answering the remaining questions or attaching files with the required information.

  • Answering the remaining questions
  • Attaching files

Attach files

2. Our records indicate that this business fulfills its reporting obligations using file attachment(s). Please attach the required file(s) containing your electricity supply and disposition information for [Month] 2024. You may also attach other files you feel are necessary.

Please report in megawatt-hours (MWh) and thousands of dollars for all electricity generation, imports, receipts, exports and deliveries by type of consumers (i.e., 'end use' or enrolled with a third party retailer).

To attach files

  • Press the Attach files button.
  • Choose the file to attach. Multiple files can be attached.

Note

  • Each file must not exceed 5 MB.
  • All attachments combined must not exceed 50 MB.
  • The name and size of each file attached will be displayed on the page.

Sub-type for all electricity generation

1. In [Month] 2024, did this business generate electricity?

Electricity may be generated for internal use and/or for sale.

  • Yes
  • No

2. In [Month] 2024, what methods were employed by this business to generate electricity?

Exclude purchased electricity.

Select all that apply.

Nuclear: Electricity generated at an electric power plant whose turbines are driven by steam generated in a reactor by heat from the fission of nuclear fuel.

Hydro: Electric power generated from a plant in which the turbine generators are driven by flowing water.

Tidal: Electric power generated from a plant in which turbine generators are driven from tidal movements.

Wind: A power plant in which the prime mover is a wind turbine. Electric power is generated by the conversion of wind power into mechanical energy.

Solar: Electricity created using Photovoltaic (PV) technology which converts sunlight into electricity OR electricity created using solar thermal technology where sunlight heats a liquid or gas to drive a turbine or engine.

Wave: Electricity generated from mechanical energy derived from wave motion.

Geothermal: Electricity generated from heat emitted from within the earth's crust, usually in the form of hot water or steam.

Other non-combustible sources: This includes fuels such as waste heat, steam, and steam purchased from another company. Specify in the space provided.

  • Thermal Generation - combustible fuels.
    • Include coal, natural gas, petroleum, wood, spent pulping liquor, biogas, municipal and other waste, other combustible fuels.
  • Nuclear
  • Hydro
  • Tidal
  • Wind
  • Solar
  • Wave
  • Geothermal
  • Other
    • Specify other non-combustible methods

Electricity generation by all selected methods and fuel types

3. In [Month] 2024, which types of combustible fuel were used by this business to generate electricity?

Select all that apply.

Coal: A readily combustible, black or brownish-black rock-like substance, whose composition, including inherent moisture, consists of more than 50% by weight and 70% by volume of carbonaceous material. It is formed from plant remains that have been compacted, hardened, chemically altered and metamorphosed by heat and pressure over geologic time without access to air.

Natural gas: A mixture of hydrocarbons (principally methane) and small quantities of various hydrocarbons existing in the gaseous phase or in solution with crude oil in underground reservoirs.

Petroleum: This covers both naturally occurring unprocessed crude oil and petroleum products that are made up of refined crude oil and used as a fuel source (i.e., crude oil, synthetic crude oil, natural gas liquids, naphtha, kerosene, jet fuel, gasoline, diesel, and fuel oil; excludes Petroleum coke, bitumen and other oil products not specified).

For 'Other' non-renewable combustible fuels: This includes fuels such as propane, orimulsion, petroleum coke, coke oven gas, ethanol and any other type of non-renewable combustible fuels not otherwise identified on the questionnaire. Specify in the spaces provided.

Wood and wood waste: Wood and wood energy used as fuel, including round wood (cord wood), lignin, wood scraps from furniture and window frame manufacturing, wood chips, bark, sawdust, shavings, lumber rejects, forest residues, charcoal and pulp waste from the operation of pulp mills, sawmills and plywood mills.

Spent pulping liquor (Black liquor): A recycled by-product formed during the pulping of wood in the paper-making process. It is primarily made up of lignin and other wood constituents, and chemicals that are by-products of the manufacture of chemical pulp. It is burned as fuel or in a recovery boiler which produces steam which can be used to produce electricity.

Biogas: Landfill gas, or gas from anaerobic digestors using organic matter like manure, crop waste, food waste, sewage, etc.

Municipal and other waste: Wastes (liquids or solids) produced by households, industry, hospitals and others (e.g., paper, cardboard, rubber, leather, natural textiles, wood, brush, grass clippings, kitchen wastes and sewage sludge).

Other type of Biomass: Any other type of biomass not otherwise identified on the questionnaire. This includes fuels such as food waste, used diapers etc.

Non-renewable combustible fuels

  • Coal
  • Natural gas
  • Petroleum
  • Other - Specify the other non-renewable combustible types

Biomass

  • Wood
  • Spent pulping liquor
  • Biogas
  • Municipal and other waste
  • Other - Specify the other types of biomass'

4. In [Month] 2024, what was the gross quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity generated by this business from the following?

Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period. Gross electricity generation = Net electricity generation + Own use consumption from self-generated electricity.

Exclude purchased electricity

In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity generated by this business from the following?
  Quantity in MWh
Non-renewable combustible fuels  
a. Coal  
b. Natural gas  
c. Petroleum. Please report the generation from the use of diesel under Petroleum.  
d. Other – Specify the other non-renewable combustible types  
Total megawatt-hours generated from non-renewable combustible fuels  
Biomass  
e. Wood  
f. Spent pulping liquor  
g. Biogas  
h. Municipal and other waste  
i. Other – Specify the other types of biomass  
Total megawatt-hours generated from biomass  
Total electricity production from combustible fuels  
j. Nuclear  
k. Hydro  
l. Tidal  
m. Wind  
n. Solar  
o. Wave  
p. Geothermal  
q. Other - Specify the other types of electricity produced from combustible fuels  
Total production of electricity  

Import of electricity from the United States

5. In [Month] 2024, did this business import electricity from the United States?

  • Yes
  • No

6. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) and the value of imported electricity from the United States?

If applicable, please report the total quantity of electricity (MWh) and Canadian dollar value (thousands of dollars) this business imported/purchased from the United States.

Exclude sales tax

  • Quantity in MWh
  • CAN$ '000

Withdrawals or purchases of electricity from other Canadian producers and distributors

7. In [Month] 2024, did this business receive or purchase electricity from other sources in Canada?

Include

  • electricity received from other producers or distributors including affiliated direct purchase and wholesale consumers
  • withdrawals from the grid for own consumption or for resale.
  • Yes
  • No

Withdrawals or purchases of electricity from other Canadian producers and distributors

8. In [Month] 2024, from which province or territory was electricity received, purchased or withdrawn by this business?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

9. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) and the value of electricity received or purchased by this business?

Include:

  • electricity received from other producers or distributors, including affiliated direct purchase and wholesale consumers
  • withdrawals from the grid for own use consumption or for resale

Exclude sales tax

If applicable, please report the total quantity of electricity (MWh) (thousands of dollars) purchased or received from within and/or other provinces (e.g., other utilities/producers, transmitters, distributors).

In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) and the value of electricity received by this business?
  Quantity in MWh CAN$ '000
a. Newfoundland and Labrador    
b. Prince Edward Island    
c. Nova Scotia    
d. New Brunswick    
e. Quebec    
f. Ontario    
g. Manitoba    
h. Saskatchewan    
i. Alberta    
j. British Columbia    
k. Yukon    
l. Northwest Territories    
m. Nunavut    
Total quantity and value of electricity purchased or withdrawn from other domestic companies    

Own use consumption from self-generated electricity

10. In [Month] 2024, did this business consume self-generated electricity for its own use?

Own use consumption (also known as Producer consumption or Station service) refers to consumption of self-generated electricity (excludes imported or purchased electricity) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

Own use consumption = Gross electricity - Net electricity generation (Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period. Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

  • Yes
  • No

11. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) of self-generated electricity consumed by this business for its own use?

Own use consumption (also known as Producer consumption or Station service) refers to consumption of self-generated electricity (excludes imported or purchased electricity) for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

Own use consumption = Gross electricity - Net electricity generation (Gross electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period. Gross electricity generation is the total amount of electricity generated by the power plant during the reporting period.

Net electricity generation is the amount of electricity generated by the power plant that is delivered to the electricity grid during the reporting period).

Quantity in MWh

Own consumption from imported, received or purchased electricity

12. For [Month] 2024, you have indicated that this business imported, received or purchased electricity. Was any of this electricity imported, received or purchased for the business's own consumption? 

Own consumption from purchased electricity refers to withdrawals from the grid which is electricity that is billed by another company for the direct support of the plant or business itself during the reporting period.

Include withdrawals from the grid which is electricity that is billed by another company.

  • Yes
  • No

13. For [Month] 2024, you have indicated that this business imported, received or purchased electricity. How much electricity in MWh was imported, received or purchased for the business's own consumption?

Include withdrawals from the grid which is electricity that is billed by another company.

Export of electricity to the United States

14. In [Month] 2024, did this business export electricity to the United States?

  • Yes
  • No

15. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) and value of exported electricity to the United States?

If applicable, please report the total quantity of electricity (MWh) and Canadian dollar value (thousands of dollars) this business exported/sold to the United States

  • Quantity in MWh
  • CAN$ '000

Exclude sales tax.

Delivery of electricity to other domestic utilities or distributors in Canada

16. In [Month] 2024, did this business deliver electricity to other companies in Canada such as utilities, system operators (the grid), producers, transmitters and/or distributors for the purpose of resale?

  • Yes
  • No

17. In [Month] 2024, which province or territory was electricity delivered to?

Select all that apply.

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Quebec
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nunavut

18. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) and the value of electricity delivered to other companies in Canada such as utilities, system operators (the grid), producers, transmitters and/or distributors for the purpose of resale?

If applicable, please report the total quantity of electricity (MWh) and total dollar value (thousands of dollars) your company sold to other domestic companies, by province or territory.

Exclude sales tax.

In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) and the value of electricity delivered to other companies in Canada such as utilities, system operators (the grid), producers, transmitters and/or distributors for the purpose of resale?
  Quantity in MWh CAN$ '000
a. Newfoundland and Labrador    
b. Prince Edward Island    
c. Nova Scotia    
d. New Brunswick    
e. Quebec    
f. Ontario    
g. Manitoba    
h. Saskatchewan    
i. Alberta    
j. British Columbia    
k. Yukon    
l. Northwest Territories    
m. Nunavut    
Total quantity and value of delivered electricity to other domestic businesses    

Disposition of electricity by type of consumer

19. In [Month] 2024, did this business deliver electricity to consumers enrolled with retailers such as Direct Energy?

A retailer does not own any distribution lines, it operates as a middleman and relies on utility companies to deliver to their clients the electricity it has purchased on the markets.

Retailers only operate in Alberta and Ontario where the electricity markets have been deregulated, and where, by law, the generation, transmission and distribution activities must be performed by different companies.

  • Yes
  • No

Delivery of electricity for consumers enrolled with retailers

20. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity delivered to the following types of consumers enrolled with retailers?

Exclude electricity delivered to other utilities or distributors.

In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity delivered to the following types of consumers enrolled with retailers?
  Quantity in MWh
a. To industrial customers. Include mining and manufacturing.  
b. To residential customers. Include residential and agricultural.  
c. To commercial and other institutional customers. Include deliveries to urban transit systems, pipeline transportation and natural gas distribution, public administration, street lighting and commercial and other institutional.  

Delivery of electricity to ultimate consumer

21. In [Month] 2024, did this business deliver electricity to 'end use' consumers?

'End Use' refers to the direct consumption of energy by consumers. In the case of 'residential end-use customers', for example, end use refers to electricity consumed by the residential sector or customers.

  • Yes
  • No


22. In [Month] 2024, what was the quantity in megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity delivered to the following types of 'end use' consumers?

  Quantity in MWh
a. To industrial end-user customers. Include mining and manufacturing.  
b. To residential end-user customers. Include residential and agricultural.  
c. To commercial and other institutional end-user customers. Include deliveries to urban transit systems, pipeline transportation and natural gas distribution, public administration, street lighting and commercial and other institutional.  


23. In [Month] 2024, what was the value of electricity delivered to the following types of 'end use' consumers?
Exclude sales tax.

  CAN$ '000
a. To industrial end-user customers. Include mining and manufacturing.  
b. To residential end-user customers. Include residential and agricultural.  
c. To commercial and other institutional end-user customers. Include deliveries to urban transit systems, pipeline transportation and natural gas distribution, public administration, street lighting and commercial and other institutional.  

Balancing electricity supply and disposition

The total supply of electricity must be equal to the sum of the total disposition of electricity and the total unallocated and/or losses. Unallocated and/or losses was automatically calculated as the difference between your reported total supply of electricity and total disposition of electricity. If the calculated unallocated and/or losses is not correct, use the Previous button to adjust either the supply or disposition of electricity. If it is correct, select the Next button.

24. This is a summary of your balancing electricity supply and disposition.

Please review the values and, if needed, press the Previous button at the bottom of the page to navigate to the previous pages to make any modifications.

Unallocated and/or losses

Include:

  • transmission losses
  • adjustments
  • 'unaccounted for' amounts which are subject to variation because of cyclical billing
  • losses in the main generator transformers and the electrical energy absorbed by the generating auxiliaries.
This is a summary of your balancing electricity supply and disposition.
  Quantity in MWh
Supply  
 a. Gross production of electricity
 Net electricity generation + Own use consumption from self-generated electricity
 
b. Imported electricity from the United States  
c. Withdrawal or purchased electricity  
Total supply of electricity
i.e., the total quantity available for use, distribution or sale
 
Disposition  
d. Own use consumption from self-generated electricity  
e. Own consumption from imported, received or purchased electricity   
f. Exported electricity to United States  
g. Delivered electricity to other domestic businesses  
h. Delivered electricity to consumers enrolled with retailers  
i. Delivered electricity to end-use consumers  
Total disposition of electricity
i.e., the total quantity used, distributed or sold
 
Unallocated and/or losses  
j. Total supply of electricity  
k. Total disposition of electricity  
Total unallocated and/or losses  

Changes or events

25. Indicate any changes or events that affected the reported values for this business or organization, compared with the last reporting period.

Select all that apply.

  • Strike or lock-out
  • How many days in "month" was your business or organization open?
  • Exchange rate impact
  • Price changes in goods or services sold
  • Contracting out
  • Organizational change
  • Price changes in labour or raw materials
  • Natural disaster
  • How many days in "month" was your business or organization open?
  • Recession
  • Change in product line
  • Sold business or business units
  • Expansion
  • New or lost contract
  • Plant closures
  • How many days in "month" was your business or organization open?
  • Acquisition of business or business units
  • Plant expansion or contraction
  • Other
    Specify the other changes or events:
  • No changes or events

Contact person

26. Statistics Canada may need to contact the person who completed this questionnaire for further information.

Is the provided given names and the provided family name the best person to contact?

  • Yes
  • No

Who is the best person to contact about this questionnaire?

  • First name:
  • Last name:
  • Title:
  • Email address:
  • Telephone number (including area code):
  • Extension number (if applicable)
    The maximum number of characters is 5.
  • Fax number (including area code):

Feedback

27. How long did it take to complete this questionnaire

Include the time spent gathering the necessary information.

  • Hours:
  • Minutes:

28. Do you have any comments about this questionnaire?

Notes on the monthly release of Canadian international merchandise trade

For the monthly release of the Canadian international merchandise trade in the Daily, a variant of the NAPCS 2022 version 1.0 for merchandise import and export accounts is used to categorize traded products. For more information, please see Variant of NAPCS 2022 – Merchandise import and export accounts.

Merchandise trade is one component of Canada's international balance of payments (BOP), which also includes trade in services, investment income, current transfers, and capital and financial flows.

International trade data by commodity are available on a BOP and a customs basis. International trade data by country are available on a customs basis for all countries and on a BOP basis for Canada's 27 principal trading partners (PTPs). The list of PTPs is based on their annual share of total merchandise trade—imports and exports—with Canada in 2012. BOP data are derived from customs data by adjusting for factors such as valuation, coverage, timing and residency. These adjustments are made to conform to the concepts and definitions of the Canadian System of National Accounts.

For a conceptual analysis of BOP-based data versus customs-based data, see Balance of Payments trade in goods at Statistics Canada: Expanding geographic detail to 27 principal trading partners.

For more information on these and other macroeconomic concepts, see the Methodological Guide: Canadian System of Macroeconomic Accounts (Catalogue number13-607-X) and the User Guide: Canadian System of Macroeconomic Accounts (Catalogue number13-606-G).

The data in this release are on a BOP basis and are seasonally adjusted. Unless otherwise stated, values are expressed in nominal terms, or current dollars. References to prices are based on aggregate Paasche (current-weighted) price indexes (2017=100). Movements within aggregate Paasche prices can be influenced by changes in the share of values traded for specific goods, with sudden shifts in trading patterns—as observed with the COVID-19 pandemic—sometimes resulting in large movements in Paasche price indexes. Volumes, or constant dollars, are calculated using the Laspeyres formula (2017=100), unless otherwise stated.

For information on seasonal adjustment, see Seasonally adjusted data – Frequently asked questions.

Revisions

In general, merchandise trade data are revised on an ongoing basis for each month of the current year. Current-year revisions are reflected in the customs-based and the BOP-based data.

The previous year's customs-based data are revised with the release of data for the January and February reference months, and thereafter on a quarterly basis. The previous two years of customs-based data are revised annually, and revisions are released in February with the December reference month.

The previous year's BOP-based data are revised with the release of data for the January, February, March and April reference months. To remain consistent with the Canadian System of Macroeconomic Accounts, revisions to BOP-based data for previous years are released annually in December with the October reference month.

Factors influencing revisions include the late receipt of import and export documentation, incorrect information on customs forms, the replacement of estimates produced for the energy section with actual figures, changes in merchandise classification based on more current information, and changes to seasonal adjustment factors. The seasonal adjustment parameters are reviewed and updated annually and applied with the October reference month release.

For information on data revisions for exports of energy products, see Methodology for Exports of Energy Products within the International Merchandise Trade Program.

Revised data are available in the appropriate tables.

Disaggregated Data Action Plan Accomplishments Report 2022-2023: Building on a solid foundation

The Disaggregated Data Action Plan (DDAP) is a whole-of-government approach led by Statistics Canada to support governmental and societal efforts to address known inequalities and promote fair and inclusive decision making.

The DDAP supports Statistics Canada's efforts to continually identify and fill data and knowledge gaps across its programs. This leads to more representative data collection and enhanced statistics on diverse populations by collecting, analyzing and disseminating more disaggregated data than ever before. Disaggregated data are data that have been broken down into categories (e.g., gender, age, income, geographic region) to better understand the experiences of diverse population groups and potentially reveal important insights between and among different groups that may have otherwise been missed.

In 2022/2023, Statistics Canada expanded on the previous year's disaggregated data accomplishments by employing innovative survey designs and sampling methods, which allowed for more intersectional analyses and insights on diverse population groups. For instance, studies conducted during this period examined trends in pay gaps; the housing experiences of various population groups; the overrepresentation of Indigenous people in provincial custody; and the educational and economic outcomes of lesbian, gay and bisexual people from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds. Furthermore, DDAP-funded research on innovative methods included improving sampling for better representation of diverse population groups and coordinating sampling between surveys to reduce respondent burden, especially for small population groups.

Building on work started in 2021/2022, Statistics Canada continues to modernize its data collection and administrative data programs. Notably, monthly Labour Force Survey (LFS) supplements were collected from April to December 2022, and the resulting data offer valuable insights on the quality of employment for various groups. Once funding is secured for the completion of the project, new variables will be added to the Civil Court Survey, allowing for the integration of civil court data in other administrative databases. Finally, the DDAP Administrative Data Fund, which provides funding to external partners to enable them to enhance their administrative data holdings, was introduced.

Statistics Canada routinely engages with various partners and stakeholders to meet the increasing information needs of Canadians. Noteworthy achievements include Statistics Canada's partnerships with selected cities to enhance the Business Register, as well as identify strategies to address municipal data gaps.

The following sections highlight the achievements of key projects funded under the DDAP in 2022/2023.

Expanded disaggregated data assets

Social, health and labour indicators

Statistics Canada launched the first wave of the Survey Series on People and their Communities (SSPC), which collected sufficient disaggregated data to examine the experiences of racialized Canadians and immigrants, including newcomers to Canada. The first panel included questions on sport, community engagement, confidence in institutions, political engagement and workplace culture. The first set of SSPC results was released in March 2023.

Statistics Canada has also been developing a framework to address data gaps on the care economy. Questions were added to the sixth wave of the Canadian Social Survey, which focused on paid and unpaid caregiving for both children and care-dependent adults. An article was released in November 2022, and others are forthcoming. Additionally, many data tables using disaggregated data from the General Social Survey were produced for the Quality of Life Framework and the Social Inclusion Framework.

Statistics Canada continued to work on the production of demographic projections and estimates for specific population groups and lower levels of geography. In September 2022, Statistics Canada released population projections on immigration and diversity in Canada up to 2041. These projections are discussed in a report and are available in table form and as part of an interactive dashboard. The 2022 population estimates for municipalities (2016 census subdivision boundaries) were also released in January 2023.

Consultative engagements and a feasibility exercise were completed regarding the addition of new content to the Civil Court Survey. New variables will be added and will include personal identifiers to allow the integration of civil court data in other Statistics Canada databases. This data integration will allow for the analysis of socioeconomic factors, including information on Indigenous people and racialized groups, which will provide insight into the experiences of diverse populations in Canadian civil courts. Additionally, following recommendations from public engagement on the new Canadian Correctional Services Survey, Statistics Canada developed new population-based indicators and analysis on the overrepresentation of Indigenous people in provincial custody.

Disaggregated data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were used to develop a variety of products, including social inclusion indicators for Canada's ethnocultural groups, food security indicators and data pertaining to access to a regular health care provider. In addition, 2015 to 2018 CCHS data allowed for the release of a table on the socioeconomic characteristics of the lesbian, gay and bisexual population. Further, data from the 2016 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort were integrated with administrative data, which were then used to calculate COVID-19 mortality among racialized populations in Canada and its association with income.

Additional enhancements were made to the LFS in 2022/2023, including additional indicators on quality of employment for diverse population groups in Canada. Specifically, data pertaining to child care and career challenges experienced by parents, financial difficulties faced by households in the context of high inflation, and the number of Canadians working through digital platforms were collected. Further, the new Labour Market and Socio-economic Indicators (LMSI) survey, a supplement to the LFS, was implemented to collect data about labour, support payments and unmet health care needs, and to monitor the economic well-being of individuals and families. Data from the LMSI and the Canadian Income Survey were integrated to provide 12 months of LFS data on people with disabilities. These disaggregated data will be released every year. This improved coverage enabled detailed analyses on the labour market characteristics of people with and without disabilities in 2022.

Data on business conditions

The Canadian Survey on Business Conditions plays a vital role in helping governments understand the key economic issues that businesses in Canada are facing. Detailed data are published for all provinces and territories and the 20 largest census metropolitan areas, by population centre and rural area, business size, and sector. Data tables on the average percentage of women and men in management positions were released for the first quarter of 2023. Data tables on private sector business counts disaggregated by majority ownership were also released for the second quarter of 2022, third quarter of 2022, fourth quarter of 2022 and first quarter of 2023. All other data tables released were crossed with majority ownership variables, including majority ownership by women, Indigenous people, immigrants to Canada, members of the 2SLGBTQ+ population and members of racialized groups.

Data integration and administrative data

On the data integration side, two projects focused on patent-related research to fill important data and knowledge gaps on patenting by gender at the business and individual levels. The Canadian Patent Research Database is now included in the Linkable File Environment, which allows for Statistics Canada's business microdata to be integrated with different administrative and survey sources. In addition, databases pertaining to business ownership and government business support programs for the COVID-19 pandemic were integrated, updated and made accessible to a wider research community. This fostered research on the impact of the pandemic on businesses owned by underrepresented groups and how those businesses were supported by government programs. The integration of such databases led to the development of a forthcoming research paper on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on underrepresented groups, including women and immigrants.

Finally, 2022/2023 saw the launch of the DDAP Administrative Data Fund, which provides external partners with an opportunity to improve their own disaggregated administrative data holdings. In 2022/2023, the Administrative Data Fund team launched an agency-wide callout for proposals and received numerous applications for funding. All proposals were reviewed, and five initiatives that span the social and economic domains were recommended for potential funding. These proposals will be funded throughout 2023/2024, as the budget permits.

Increased analytical insights

Statistics Canada continues to provide detailed statistical information about the economic, social and health experiences and outcomes of diverse groups in Canada. Overall, 45% of analytical products released by Statistics Canada during the 2022/2023 fiscal year included disaggregated data for at least one of the four employment equity groups (i.e., Indigenous people, women, members of racialized populations and people with disabilities).

With regard to the interrelated health and socioeconomic outcomes of Canadians, one research project focused on how historical improvements in life expectancy and health status influence economic outcomes, such as earnings and employment, for diverse groups in Canada. An article pertaining to the educational and economic outcomes of lesbian, gay and bisexual people from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds was also released. Another project examined the association between cybervictimization and mental health among diverse Canadian youth, including transgender and non-binary youth, Indigenous youth, and those with chronic conditions. An article examining variations in immigrants' lower risk of suicide-related behaviours was also released. In collaboration with policy partners, these projects led to the production of detailed statistical information to highlight the experiences of diverse groups of Canadians, shed light on inequities and promote inclusion in decision making.

Two other projects focused on the changing demographics of racialized people in Canada and variation in poverty among racialized groups. An introduction paper and a series of fact sheets on housing provide timely analytical insights into the housing experiences of various population groups in Canada.

In terms of labour, disaggregated data and analysis from the LFS were highlighted in monthly releases and other publications throughout the year. The October 2022 LFS release included estimates of the share of Canadians living in households experiencing financial difficulties, and new insights on self-employment among racialized groups were included in the July 2022 release.

May 2022 marked the first release of the Quality of Employment in Canada publication, which provided data and analysis on key quality of employment indicators using an internationally supported statistical framework. The release included an article on pay gaps, which examined the average hourly wages of racialized employees and provided updated information on the gender wage gap.

In terms of business and economic statistics, a study examined the patenting activity of women-owned businesses and compared it with that of men. Forward-looking analyses on businesses owned by women, members of racialized groups, immigrants and Indigenous people were also released based on data from the Canadian Survey on Business Conditions. Key highlights include analysis on businesses majority-owned by women in the second quarter of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023, businesses majority-owned by immigrants, and businesses majority-owned by immigrants to Canada and businesses majority-owned by racialized people.

To better understand the participation of Indigenous people in the Canadian economy, Statistics Canada is developing the Indigenous Peoples Economic Account (IPEA). A feasibility study with preliminary estimates was published in August 2022. The first iteration of the IPEA had three components: a suite of economic indicators; a human resource module, which provides estimates related to paid worker jobs by various sociodemographic characteristics; and a supplementary analysis showing how estimates of gross domestic product, output and total jobs could be further broken down by location of residence and Indigenous identity group.

Enhanced access to disaggregated data

Statistics Canada’s Municipal Data Program successfully launched the Centre for Municipal and Local Data. This provides a primary platform for municipal users to access data at the level of geography most relevant to municipalities. The release was promoted through municipal associations, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Statistics Canada offices that constantly collaborate with municipalities.

In addition, the Municipal Financial and Socioeconomic Data Dashboard was updated to include 35 cities, including two regions in Ontario, which established the framework for how to allocate regional finances and services.

The Gender, Diversity and Inclusion Statistics Hub continues to bring together data tables, analyses and announcements regarding diverse population groups on a centralized platform, making it easier for data users to access disaggregated data and analyses. New statistical products are promoted via social media campaigns, highlighted on the hub, and shared with key partners and stakeholders via email. Consultations with non-federal organizations and academia took place to gather feedback on the usability of the hub, and their outcome is being considered for future enhancements.

Statistics Canada continues to leverage existing data access solutions such as Public Use Microdata Files and Real Time Remote Access to improve access to and dissemination of disaggregated data for Canadians.

Strong methods and statistical standards

A robust methodology and well-defined standards are essential to the production of high-quality data and reliable statistics. To improve the statistical representation of diverse population groups in surveys, Statistics Canada has diversified its sampling strategies, such as by using multiple sampling frames and optimizing sample allocation among the various subpopulations of interest, while ensuring the coordination of samples drawn to reduce any overlap and additional respondent burden. It is also testing non-probabilistic sampling methods for hard-to-reach populations. A methodological guide was developed to summarize all relevant sampling approaches in the DDAP context. Moreover, methods related to disaggregation were presented and discussed by statisticians from around the world at Statistics Canada's 2022 International Methodology Symposium, "Data disaggregation: Building a more-representative data portrait of society."

To address partial non-response in surveys and facilitate further disaggregation, Statistics Canada has explored imputation strategies using data modelling and machine learning techniques. For instance, the efficacy of machine learning models was evaluated to address partial non-response across demographic variables such as sex, gender, Indigenous identity and racialized group in the Canadian Correctional Services Survey. While the conclusion was that more refinement of the models was needed before machine learning could be adopted for this purpose, the exercise answered several questions regarding the use of this technique. This annual survey includes variables on Indigenous identity, racialized status and other self-reported information. For certain individuals, information is missing, resulting in some groups being undercounted in correctional institutions.

For tackling the response mobility of DDAP group identification, modelling techniques were developed to improve the accuracy of identification in surveys such as the SSPC. Probabilities of identification in various groups of interest were also modelled at the sampling stage for the Canadian Survey on Business Conditions and the Survey on Financing and Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises, as part of a study on low or underrepresented populations among Canadian business owners.

Statistics Canada continued to develop new statistical standards. A new Standards, data sources and methods web page is now available to the public and was developed to improve the usability of the standards.

Statistics Canada's leadership in the development of international statistical standards on new forms of employment was reflected in the publication of the Handbook on Forms of Employment by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe in August 2022. This new handbook provides guidance on the measurement of forms of employment and describes new types of arrangements and technologies that may place workers from diverse groups in vulnerable situations. In December 2022, Statistics Canada conducted an LFS supplementary survey on digital platform employment based on these international standards and recommendations. The results showed that in 2022, more than half of workers who provided ride or delivery services through an app or platform were immigrants. To examine changes over time, Statistics Canada will collect these data again in December 2023.

In June 2022, Statistics Canada released Reference Data as a Service (RDaaS) to provide machine-readable access to the DDAP standards. RDaaS includes the code sets, classifications and concordances that are used within Statistics Canada to harmonize data for better interdepartmental data integration and analysis.

Continued engagement and collaboration

Engagement and consultations with partners are crucial for ensuring the relevance of Statistics Canada statistical programs, data and statistical standards.

Statistics Canada undertook consultations as part of the review of the visible minority concept to identify the appropriate terminology and categories to describe the population and properly address data needs in health, education, justice and employment equity. The consultations opened in October 2022 and were conducted with virtual group discussions and information sessions, and e-forms and written submissions. Statistics Canada received submissions from over 460 individuals from a variety of organizations, including anti-racism groups, civil society organizations, ethnocultural community organizations, religious networks and social inclusion groups, and from the general public.

In 2022/2023, the expansion of the Uniform Crime Reporting Survey continued. This initiative will ensure that the collection of data on the Indigenous and racialized identity of accused people and victims of crime fulfills the data needs of communities, the police, policy makers and the Canadian population more broadly. In September 2022, an interim report with recommendations to guide the path forward was released, and a second round of engagements focusing on operationalizing the recommendations outlined in the interim report started in August 2022. The system was updated based on the recommendations received and should be ready to receive data from police services in January 2024.

With funding from the DDAP, the Uniform Calls for Service Reporting Program was able to advance in 2022/2023 on a plan developed in the previous year to operationalize a national-level reporting program that gathers microdata records of calls for assistance made by the public to police. This initiative fills important gaps in information on the full spectrum of police work, more specifically by examining the non-criminal types of events that police respond to, and the diverse populations who live within communities where these calls take place.

In terms of municipal data, Statistics Canada worked closely with five cities to create an administrative data template to upload information to the Business Register. Furthermore, data for 35 cities were released in the Municipal Financial and Socioeconomic Data Dashboard. This project is linked to a broader initiative aimed at encouraging municipalities and their jurisdictions to adopt standard approaches to the collection and sharing of government statistics with Statistics Canada.

Additionally, members of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities were contacted over the winter of 2023 to find out how they use Statistics Canada data, to identify key data priorities and to identify other ways to collaborate. The results will guide Statistics Canada's future data improvements at lower levels of geography, in collaboration with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and its provincial and territorial jurisdictions.

To meet Statistics Canada's long-term goal of effectively measuring the diversity of members on non-profit boards, Statistics Canada held a series of consultations with representatives from the non-profit sector. Furthermore, an external advisory committee with leaders from governments, academia and the non-profit sector across Canada was established and will serve as a forum to share expertise regarding this important sector.

Internally, subject-matter experts from across Statistics Canada collaboratively developed a comprehensive training workshop to build analytical capacity to effectively analyze disaggregated data and produce meaningful research and insights on diverse populations in Canada.

Statistics Canada: Road to Accessibility, 2023 Progress Report

Release date: December 18, 2023

Catalogue no. 13-26-0004-2023002
ISSN 2817-0903

General

To request an alternate format (such as large font, braille, American Sign Language [ASL] and langue des signes québécois [LSQ]), please contact Statistics Canada's Accessibility Secretariat.

Statistics Canada: Road to Accessibility, 2023 Progress Report - PDF Version (PDF, 416.06 KB)

How to provide feedback

The Head of the Equity, Talent Development and Workforce Strategy Division, Workforce and Workplace Branch is designated to receive feedback on behalf of StatCan. We want to hear from you.

Do you want to send us feedback anonymously? You can send us mail, call, or use our Accessibility feedback form without providing any personal information.

Your feedback is important to us. Feedback received will be acknowledged in the same way it was received unless it was received anonymously.

For more information, please consult this Privacy Notice.

Introduction

The Accessible Canada Act (ACA) aims to create a barrier-free Canada by 2040 by identifying barriers and preventing the creation of new ones. Statistics Canada published its first accessibility action plan in December 2022. Even before the publication of the plan, our agency has been committed to accessibility and has made great progress in becoming more accessible.

Accessibility is everyone's responsibility. Over the course of the year, this has become evident as teams and individuals across the agency have contributed to the progress. The 2023 Progress Report on the Accessibility Action Plan for Statistics Canada is an important milestone. This report showcases 105 accomplishments from September 2022 to September 2023 as part of our journey to becoming an accessibility confident organization.

Accomplishments by the numbers (September 2022 to September 2023)

  • 22 presentations to StatCan Persons with Disabilities Committee Meetings on topics ranging from progress on the Engaging (Dis)ability Innovation, to Fire drill dates and procedures, to Ergonomic lending libraries at Tunney's Pasture, Office noise level measurements to R/Python programming languages for data science and analytics.
  • 50 participants took the pilot Government of Canada (GC) Workplace Accessibility Passport manager training
  • 40 participants attended the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport informal consultation sessions
  • 15 Accessibility Feedback instances received from December 23rd, 2022, to September 1st, 2023
  • 195 attendees to the awareness presentation on deafblindness hosted with Carleton University's Canadian Accessibility Network
  • 687 views of the May 2023 self-paced 'challenge' for leadership
  • 440 average views per month of the centralized site for accessibility-related information and reports
  • 630 workplace accommodation requests received
  • 467 workplace accommodation requests processed
  • 34 average processing time (in days) for all accommodation requests which is a marked improvement from 2021 of 54 days.
  • 78% satisfaction with workplace accommodations that were implemented (2022 Public Service Employee Survey)
  • 8 accessibility evaluations initiated for Regional Offices
  • 100% of priority repairs (repairs that pose immediate danger) on 8 temporary spaces (swing space floors) were completed.
  • 5 licenses procured of each commonly requested accessibility software.
  • 28 Sign Language videos published in American Sign Language and Langue de signes du Quebec
  • 11,059 page views housing ASL/LSQ videos
    • 3,821 plays of these videos with a completion rate of 23%.
  • 103 full digital service accessibility reviews conducted (82 External Services, 21 internal services)

Accomplishments by priority areas and the barriers they address

Culture

An accessible culture within StatCan is accessibility-confident and disability-inclusive. Focus and commitment are put on educating all employees and managers to empower and inform them on accessibility. Accessibility standards and best practices are emphasized, and employees feel confident and safe in speaking out on barriers to accessibility and potential solutions.

Accomplishments

Addressing the lack of awareness
  1. Created a page on the Internal Communication Network (ICN) to centralize all internal accessibility-related information and reports for employees and managers.
  2. Organized plain language training for StatCan employees. Promoted accessibility training from the School of Public Service and free bilingual online accessibility training.
  3. Organized awareness presentations with Carleton University's Canadian Accessibility Network on deafblindness and the removal of accessibility barriers.
  4. Launched the National Accessibility Awareness Week (NAAW) with a message from the Persons with Disabilities Champion.
  5. Participated in a senior leader discussion with the Deputy Minister Champion for Federal Employees with Disabilities and the Chief Accessibility Officer for the National Accessibility Awareness Week (NAAW) titled "Learn from Yesterday, Change Today, Enhance Tomorrow: Building an Accessible Public Service Together"
  6. Participated in an AMI-tv Channel, the world's first television network to broadcast all programs with open format described video for Canadians who are blind or partially sighted, program segment on government wide accessibility. Footage was included in the video from the Clerk for National Public Service Week.
  7. Launched the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport with a joint message from the Chief Statistician and the Persons with Disabilities Champion.
  8. Divisions promoted the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport and discussed the tool at divisional meetings to increase take up.
  9. Organized a one-month self-paced 'challenge' for leadership allowing leaders at all levels to complete tangible actions that help the work environment become more accessible.
  10. Developed performance management objectives for executives to measure progress made in accessibility and inclusion within their teams.
  11. Piloted performance management objectives within a division for employees at all levels to expand accountability and prioritization of accessibility in their work.
  12. Developed and delivered "The basics of meeting planning" training to improve productivity and inclusivity in meetings. Training includes resources and recommendations for accessibility requirements.
  13. Participated in training for executives led by the CSPS and Live Work Play covering topics such as social motivators, impact of exclusion on the brain, approaches to accommodation, applying habits for lasting change, growth mindset, and curiosity over judgement.
  14. Launched sector committee with representatives from several divisions to collaborate on accessibility-related improvements such as best practices for internal tools and applications and brainstorming about accessibility-related employee challenges.
  15. Census, Regional Services and Operations (Field 7) identified a Divisional Champion to promote awareness and educational opportunities. The Champion is also the contact person to collect feedback from other employees about accessibility barriers. If required, action plans are developed with management to remove accessibility barriers.
Addressing the lack of inclusion and feedback
  1. Developed and managed a centralized and anonymous feedback system for all employees, Canadians and external StatCan users.
  2. Presented accessibility plan and tools to teams and employee networks across StatCan providing an avenue for information sharing, discussion, and feedback.
  3. Identified a Divisional Champion to act as the contact person for feedback from employees about accessibility barriers. If required, action plans are developed with management to remove accessibility barriers.
Addressing the lack of internal collaboration
  1. Facilitated interdivisional quarterly working group and leadership meetings to monitor and ensure progress of interdependent files.
  2. Met with teams across StatCan to discuss their accessibility strategies and consultation methods allowing for an exchange and gathering of best practices internal to the agency.
  3. The Accessibility Secretariat hosted a series of accessibility network meetings to promote accessibility knowledge sharing across the Government of Canada. These intergovernmental informal discussions allowed for an exchange and gathering of best practices external to the agency.
  4. The Centre for Health Data Integration (CHDI) and the Social Analysis and Modelling Division (SAMD) launched a community of practice to bring together a cross-functional group of subject matter experts, analysts, HR advisors and researchers within StatCan, who have the responsibility, experience, and interest in collecting, acquiring, and analyzing data, and sharing insights on the topic of disability and accessibility. The community will contribute towards members' growth by creating opportunities for collaboration and sharing of experiences through our work, projects, training, and/or education.

Workplace Accommodation

Workplace accommodation at StatCan means that accommodation is made on a confidential, case-by-case basis and employees are supplied with the functional tools and working conditions they need to maximize their potential.

Accomplishments

Addressing the lack of procedural knowledge
  1. Collaborated with internal partners on the development of Frequently Asked Questions content on how to request accommodation as part of the "Hybrid Work Environment" reference material.
  2. Maintained training and information links on the ICN.
  3. Divisions increased their knowledge on process through regular meetings with Duty to Accommodate Office, Labour Relations (when required).
Addressing delays in getting accommodations
  1. Created and collaborated on the implementation of the communication plan for launch of GC Workplace Accessibility Passport within agency to help expedite the receipt of key information and employee-manager dialogue needed for processing accommodations.
  2. Created scent-free zones, food-free zones, and low lighting zones in each physical space neighbourhood for all employees to benefit from thereby reducing the number of individual requests to process.
  3. Implemented a designated chair depot and ergonomic lending library in each physical space neighborhood which also helped reduce the processing of individual requests.
  4. Created a dedicated space for employees with noise sensitivities by converting a closed office space to be shared by employees requiring this type of accommodation.
New barrier: Lack of internal collaboration
  1. Actively participated in the internal Hybrid Work Environment planning to ensure accessibility is considered throughout the planning of the future of work.
  2. Collaborated with the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport Adopter Community of Practice on the development of tools.
  3. Collaborated with the Disability Inclusion and Workplace Accommodation Community of Practice in the development of tools and processes.

Priority Areas under the Accessibility Canada Act

Employment

Accessible employment at StatCan means that employees with disabilities and those experiencing barriers are supported throughout their employee journey. From recruitment and hiring to onboarding and career progression, all employees are supported to reach their full potential.

Accomplishments

Addressing the lack of knowledge or understanding of accessible and inclusive hiring practices
  1. Launched a pilot project to promote all posters through Equitek to better reach the Employment Equity communities.
  2. Presented the Engaging (Dis)ability summary research report to the Staffing Standing Committee.
  3. Developed and delivered awareness sessions (with partners such as LiveWorkPlay) and material on barriers persons with disabilities face throughout the employment journey for management and staffing advisors.
  4. Created ICN content promoting accessible and inclusive tools (such as the Public Service Commission hiring tools).
  5. Developed partnership strategy for Accessible and Inclusive Employment and start discussions with disability employment service organizations, university and student associations for persons with disabilities.
  6. Updated the agency's self-declaration form to increase transparency on data collection and usage.
Addressing stigma and attitudinal barriers
  1. Launched learning opportunities related to the employee journey of persons with disabilities.
  2. Developed guidance documents on duty to accommodate procedures and feedback processes related to a selection process.
  3. Launched the first internal Sponsorship program for executive or mid-level leaders who are part of equity-seeking groups (including persons with disabilities).
  4. Initiated discussions about learning styles as part of the onboarding process to ensure that employees receive the support they need from the beginning of their employment.
Addressing inflexible and complex staffing tools and processes
  1. Standardized paragraphs for staffing posters to make them more accessible.
  2. Completed initial review of the accommodation process to improve efficiency and to ensure all candidates are processed at the same pace.
  3. Initiated accessibility review of staffing communication templates.
  4. Collaborated on the agency implementation plans for the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport offering guidance for staffing processes.
  5. Developed presentation for human resources employees on accessible assessment practises.
  6. Reviewed staffing tools to ensure future recruitment and hiring are accessible for Census 2026.

Built Environment

An accessible built environment at StatCan is one where workspaces and the work environment are accessible for all. From the spaces in employees' homes to those owned or leased by StatCan, all environments used by employees will be accessible by design.

Accomplishments

Addressing the lack of consultation with persons with disabilities and those experiencing barriers
  1. Consulted with persons with disability committee on building procedures (including accessible fire safety procedures and emergency procedures).
  2. Actively participated in monthly persons with disabilities committee meetings.
Addressing that accessibility is not a key requirement in construction
  1. Met with the Persons with Disabilities Committee to review new Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) designs for R.H. Coats.
  2. Worked in collaboration with PSPC to implement accessible space reservation tools.
  3. Developed and implemented communication strategy to communicate construction plans and site closures through various media including the Accessibility site on the ICN.
To contribute to the desired state of enhancing accessibility of the workplace and employee workspaces
  1. Completed consultations with the Fire Safety Officers to ensure procedures are documented and meet accessibility requirements in the event of an emergency.
  2. Initiated evaluations in our Regional Offices to ensure documentation of accessibility plan for each office.
  3. Participated in monthly meetings with property managers regarding the accessibility of outdoor spaces.
  4. Updated large appliances in the kitchens on swing space floors to ensure accessibility such as fridges that are more readily accessible for individuals in a wheelchair and microwaves with larger print and braille for use by individuals with visual impairments.
  5. Completed repairs that pose immediate danger on swing space floors as outlined in the consultant audit.
  6. Enhanced the emergency email communication tool to also include messages in ASL.

Information and communication technologies

Accessible information and communication technologies at StatCan (often called ICT) means that IT products are usable and accessible for everyone. Whether it is software development, infrastructure support, platform operations, service request fulfillment, IT asset management, cloud environments or offsite support, these all need to be accessible.

Accomplishments

Addressing knowledge gaps within the IT team
  1. Researched and compared external accessibility maturity models.
  2. Created IT Accessibility Advisory Board for governance and guidance on Accessibility by Design development.
Addressing accessibility considerations
  1. Created Accessible Information and Communication Technology Scorecard and Maturity Model for StatCan IT.
  2. Initiated documentation of IT service processes related to accessibility requirements.
  3. Created documents guiding accessibility testing using common accessibility software on common StatCan platforms.
  4. Improved the accessibility of the Integrated Business Statistics Program (IBSP) application.
  5. Implemented the creation of a fully accessible version for each new issue of the "In Hybrid News" newsletter using the ICN.
  6. Actively discussed accessibility for GCXchange and M365 office and collaborative tools with Treasury Board in support of accessible meetings.
  7. Initiated plans for printers as part of future of work project.
Addressing unavailable tools
  1. Collaborated with Industry Canada and Innovation Solutions Canada to develop an application that conducts accessibility reviews.
Addressing lengthy accommodation processes
  1. Established the base offering of the Accessibility Software Lending Service.
  2. Procured licenses of each commonly requested accessibility software.

Communication, other than information and communication technologies

Accessible communication at StatCan means information that is provided, sent, or received is clear, direct and easy to understand and meets the needs of employees and Canadians.

Accomplishments

Addressing gaps in accessible communications
  1. Explored accessibility improvements for internal all-staff messages.
  2. Completed the census chatbot accessibility review and working with Microsoft to implement the recommendations.
  3. Increased the awareness and usage of MS 365 accessibility functions like PowerPoint Live and MS Forms.
  4. Updated internal newsletters and documents to conform with accessibility guidelines (e.g., avoiding use of certain colours).
  5. Adopted use of larger fonts in email communications (Arial 14)
Addressing the lack of emphasis on the accessible design of communications
  1. Researched plain language training options to make this a mandatory course for all StatCan employees.
  2. Collaborated with the Accessibility Secretariat to ensure efficient communication with all staff around the topic of accessibility resources and events.
  3. Added information on Video Relay Service to all the wave materials for Census test and products.
  4. Prepared braille and ASL/LSQ versions to products for Census, the Canadian Survey on Disability, Survey on Accessible Print Materials, etc.
  5. Scheduled the accessibility testing on mobile phones for the Census Chatbot.
  6. Added Alt Text requirements for all social media posts.
  7. Collaborated with the Centre of Expertise on Accessibility to learn about best practices in accessibility for apps and mobile products
  8. Adopted plain language across the agency for public facing content
  9. Added visuals and alternate formats such as tables, slides or videos to releases and documents to provide accessibility to different types of reading and learning styles.

Procurement of goods, services, and facilities

The accessible procurement of goods, services, and facilities at StatCan means to centralize purchases, including computer software and hardware and a variety of external professional services, while prioritizing accessibility.

Accomplishments

Addressing GC centralized program and policies
  1. Prepared an inventory of all the different documents and forms used during the procurement process.
  2. Adapted procurement documents to be accessible.
  3. Ensured accessibility considerations were taken in procurement files and flagged inaccessible items to project leaders.
  4. Transitioned from buyandsell.gc.ca to the new GC accessible tendering platform.
Addressing the lack of consultation
  1. Appointed a champion on accessible procurement.
  2. Planned a townhall on accessible procurement.
Addressing insufficient knowledge
  1. Attended learning events and training offered by PSPC Centre of Expertise on Accessible Procurement as well as with Shared Services Canada.

Design and delivery of programs and services

The accessible design and delivery of programs and services at StatCan means that surveys, programs, and services are inclusive and accessible by design to meet the needs of Canadians and employees.

Accomplishments

Addressing the reactive approach
  1. Revised the Notice of Web Accessibility process to now requires a brief when products are inaccessible or unreviewed to contribute to proactive accountability.
  2. Created an in-house braille version of the Statistics Canada: Road to Accessibility.
  3. Published Sign Language videos in American Sign Language and Langue des signes du Quebec (i.e.: in support of the Canadian Survey on Disability, Survey on Accessible Print Materials, etc.). The video with the highest combination of views (over 2,000) and completion rate (23%) was on First Nations People, Metis, and Inuit in Canada, and the video with the highest completion rate (42%) was on the COVID 19 Survey.
  4. Successfully promoted the use of Video Relay Services Canada to Census and other programs
  5. Continued expanding the Text-to-Speech pilot and feedback tool on multiple StatCan websites.
  6. Offered alternative collection options to survey respondents, other than traditional telephone and electronic questionnaires.
  7. Hired employees with lived experience and expertise in accessibility.
  8. Made the "Accessibility Assurance step" an integral part of the development processes for all our current and future products: (e.g. Aviation dashboard, Energy Flow Visualization (Sankey Diagram), High Frequency Electricity Dashboard (HFED)
Addressing inaccessible tools
  1. Completed the service inventory of all the programs and services at StatCan.
  2. Conducted 103 full digital service accessibility reviews for both external (82) and internal (21) services.
Addressing the lack of a centralized approach Addressing accessibility needs
  1. Shared significant advice to colleagues across the agency on accessibility features for software such as Word, PowerPoint, Outlook, and contributed to the accessibility resources on the ICN.
  2. Launched the Accessibility Review Pilot Project:
    • Completed the Accessibility Review of the agency's online learning services.
    • Contributed to the early accessibility and usability review of the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport online portal.
    • Conducted accessibility reviews to comply with the Management Accountability Framework. Responsible areas are making changes to fix accessibility barriers uncovered.
  3. Statistics Canada has been tasked – as a partner - by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to conduct accessibility reviews on the multinational STAT Data explorer. These reviews continue.

Transportation

No barriers in StatCan policies, practices, programs, and services, were identified at the time of publication of the 2023-2025 Accessibility Action Plan. The agency regularly monitors this area through our feedback mechanism, to ensure prevention and removal of barriers. This is to confirm that no new barriers have been identified since the drafting of this report.

Consultation

This section covers consultations conducted from September 2022 to September 2023. For more information about consultations conducted in order to inform the development of the 2023-2025 Accessibility Action Plan, please read the Consultation section in Statistics Canada: Road to Accessibility.

Consulting employees continues to be a critical element in the implementation of Statistics Canada: Road to Accessibility. Consultations were led by various areas to advance in the actions accomplished above.

Internal Consultation by the Accessibility Secretariat

In the spring of 2023, the agency's Accessibility Secretariat held information sessions open to all employees and which included a consultative component. To ensure continued engagement and increase the accessibility confidence of the agency, these sessions covered the framework of Statistics Canada: Road to Accessibility (StatCan Accessibility Plan), accomplishments to date, how-to submit feedback and tools they can use to make their everyday work more accessible.

The consultation sought to get the pulse on employee understanding of the plan, awareness of and sentiment towards the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport and accountability on contributing to the accessibility journey.

  • Based on our StatCan Accessibility Plan and across domains, which domain pillar is more important to you?
  • How familiar are you with the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport?
  • Do you think the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport will help you?
  • What tasks could you accomplish in your position to make StatCan more accessible?

English and French sessions were held using MS Teams to ensure access to all employees. The presentation and consultation leveraged the PowerPoint Live and built-in survey function in MS Teams. Participants were asked ahead of time if this function created accessibility barriers.

The findings and responses helped guide the agency on future communication activities related to both the Accessibility Plan and the development of support for the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport.

Persons with Disability Committee

The Persons with Disability Committee (PwDC) is an active employee committee and a key partner in the implementation of the agency's action plan. This committee's creation predates 1989. It has a very long history of identifying priorities, providing constructive advice and suggestions action-oriented solutions to StatCan management.

The Accessibility Secretariat was a regular participant in committee meetings, presenting and gathering input on:

  • Progress on the Engaging (Dis)ability Innovation
  • Findings from the external consultation report by BDO
  • Resources for the "Accessibility at StatCan" ICN page
  • The publication of the accessibility plan in accessible formats
  • Employee events in support of advancement of accessibility confidence
  • The feedback processes
  • The measurement framework
  • The GC Workplace Accessibility Passport
  • Organizational progress on accessibility
  • Workplace Occupational Health and Safety Department delivered and received feedback on:
  • Return to work safety measures
  • Updates on ergonomic assessment
  • Fire drill dates and procedures
  • Ergonomic lending libraries at Tunney's Pasture
  • KN95 masks availability and masks procedures
  • Dates and procedures for lockdown exercises
  • Office noise level measurements (results: 38-54 decibels)

The Facilities and Future of Work Project presented and received feedback on construction updates, constructions sites, and building closures.

The R/Python User Group presented their user group and prompted committee members to participate.

External Consultations by the Engagement and Data Services Division

There were two projects where persons with disabilities or to organizations that represented persons with disabilities:

For these consultation sessions, participants were given the opportunity to express any of the accommodations needs.

Gender, Diversity, and Inclusion Statistics (GDIS) Hub

The Gender, Diversity, and Inclusion Statistics (GDIS) hub monitors and reports on indicators included in many publications on subjects related to diversity and inclusion.

The long-term goal is for the GDIS Hub to become a "one stop shop" that offers meaningful data and products and creates a more user-friendly experience.

To inform this goal, 50 disability organizations were contacted as part of the process. Two organizations responded and a participant from each organization was consulted.

The format for this consultation activity was one-on-one usability testing sessions done via Microsoft Teams or Zoom. The participant was provided the link to and asked to open the prototype of the Gender, Diversity, and Inclusion Statistics Hub. They then shared their screens as they explored the page and followed some use cases.

This format was selected at because it was the best fit for the client's request. We used either Microsoft Teams or Zoom to accommodate the participant. By having the participant open and explore the prototype themselves, it allowed them to change the font size, zoom in on the page, use a screen reader or change the colour contrast as needed.

While there were several recommendations, one key recommendation was to "ensure accessibility of text and hover-over boxes (e.g. text contrast, size, machine readability)".

Text to Speech Project

Consultations were held to support the Text to Speech Project with a focus on a few of the pilot features that on certain pages of the Statistics Canada website. The feedback gathered during this session would provide insight for future considerations.

19 disability organizations and an additional 57 government working groups pertaining to accessibility or persons with disabilities we contacted. In total, there were 32 participants in this study.

We had two formats for this consultative engagement activity: a group discussion (with no more than four per session) or a one-on-one usability testing session done via Microsoft Teams or Zoom. The format was selected based on participant preference. Each participant was provided the links to various pages to review the tool ahead of time along with the questions to keep in mind when reviewing.

During the session they shared their screen as they explored the various pages with the tools as we went through the questions. Many participants had their observations ready to share. When it was a group setting, the moderating team shared their screen and explained the features of each tool both visually and verbally to accommodate all participants. Zoom was used most often as this was the preferred teleconferencing application.

Among the specific recommendations, one key takeaway was that most participants saw the value in a text-to-speech feature for a variety of audiences except for those that are fully visually impaired as they have their own tools such as screen readers. Additionally, this text to speech feature should not be seen as an "accessibility fix".

Feedback

At Statistics Canada, a Feedback page accessible to those internal and external to the agency was developed and published alongside the action plan per the ACA requirements. This page includes all relevant information to submit feedback, including the ACA definition for "barriers." Throughout the year, the feedback process was promoted in presentations across StatCan. Additionally, leads from across the agency were provided with their roles and responsibilities related to the feedback process.

Summary of the Feedback Process

This year, feedback was received only through the Accessibility Feedback Form and via email. When the Accessibility Secretariat receives feedback by email, an email acknowledgement is sent notifying the sender that the process to explore and resolve the barrier has begun. The feedback is anonymized, if necessary, and sent to area leads for evaluation and response.

If a follow-up is requested or necessary, area leads are responsible to respond (using the same medium in which the feedback is received) and are provided with support from the Accessibility Secretariat. The Accessibility Secretariat stores all communications related to the feedback in a confidential manner for the next seven years as mandated by the Accessible Canada Act.

From December 23, 2022, to September 1, 2023, we received 15 feedback:

The key themes of the feedback related:

  • Alternate format: request for a printed copy of the report
  • Communication: inaccessible documents (such as PowerPoint Presentations and PDFs) or programs (such as GCDocs)
  • Workplace Accommodations:
    • Delays in receiving proper accommodations
    • Accessibility of the workspace

Lessons learned and a look ahead to Year 2

The first year of the implementation of the agency's Accessibility Action Plan continues to offer opportunities to learn and grow. As we move into the next year, we will continue to progress on the 2023-2025 Accessibility Action Plan commitments to remove and prevent barriers. We take with us one more year of experience, insight and lessons learned. While there is pride in the accomplishments listed in earlier in this report, we acquired lessons in the areas of funding, governance, measurement, and reporting.

Funding

Sound fiscal management comes with a high threshold and specific criteria to obtain funding. For a new program like accessibility, extra efforts were required to ensure stakeholders and the investment board understood the importance of this work. Setting the groundwork on this enterprise-wide file, translated to the agency prioritizing accessibility and allocating investment funding. With the experience gained by all contributors on the initial submission for funding, complemented by the proven accomplishments from this first year, the program is poised to continue receiving the required funding to advance on accessibility commitments.

Governance

The agency established an Accessibility Leadership Taskforce (ALT) comprising of:

  • Director-level area leads representing the eight ACA and StatCan priority areas,
  • the Director General of the Workforce and Workplace Branch (WWB),
  • the Persons with Disabilities Champion, and
  • the Assistant Chief Statistician for Corporate Strategy and Management Field.

ALT is the governing body responsible for overseeing the implementation and operational accessibility requirements. Collaboration and commitment from across the agency have been key drivers to attaining our goals. We have learned that within certain areas, the ability to implement actions is facilitated by their inherent mandates (i.e.: IT and User Experience), and therefore the transition of leadership made sense to facilitate progress. Additionally, we have observed that the Employment area lead scope was far too large- covering the actions related to the employee journey from onboarding through to separation. Therefore, to ensure that each milestone in the employee journey received the focus on accessibility that it deserved, accountability was divided and shared amongst all of the WWB directors.

Measurement

StatCan was one of the organizations to publish indicators for measurement. However, as the accessibility landscape continues to evolve across the public service (i.e.: Common hybrid work model and impacts on duty to accommodate) and in implementing the planned actions, we continued to revisit the plan content including the indicators. In the coming year, we will be updating our publication of the 2023-25 Accessibility Action Plan to account for updated indicators that will align with those soon-to-be released by the Office of Public Service Accessibility, coupled with changes that will better set the agency up with a baseline from which to demonstrate success or signal areas of further attention.

Reporting

To ensure a continued momentum and accountability for the implementation of the action plan, monthly financial dashboards, quarterly accomplishment reports and the annual progress report were instituted. The monthly dashboards communicate progress, challenges, and resolutions to the investment board and senior management. The quarterly reports provide updates to the ALT and allow for enhanced collaboration and opportunities for recalibration between priority areas as needed. Lastly, the annual progress report compiles the quarterly accomplishments complimented by additional actions carried out throughout the agency organically. This document truly showcases all StatCan answering the call to help remove barriers and taking on the commitment to being inclusive by design and accessible by default.

Give feedback on this progress report

Provide feedback by filling out the Accessibility Feedback Form.

Accessibility progress reports developed by other institutions

List of accessibility progress reports developed by other institutions

Measuring pure price change: Exploring Shrinkflation in the Consumer Price Index

Measuring pure price change: Exploring Shrinkflation in the Consumer Price Index
Description - Measuring pure price change: Exploring Shrinkflation in the Consumer Price Index

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) tracks changes in prices as experiences by Canadians by comparing the cost of a fixed basket of goods and services through time. Over time, products tracked in the CPI may change in terms of quantity, which can include changes to packaging size. When a smaller quantity of a given product is sold for the same price, this is sometimes referred to as “shrinkflation,” which is a form of price inflation.

How does the CPI account for shrinkflation?

To ensure an accurate CPI, prices are measured for the same items over time in order to reflect constant quality and quantity. This, in turn, ensures that the CPI measures pure price change. When the quantity or size of a product is reduced, but the price stays the same, consumers are paying more for the same quantity of the product. To account for this in the CPI, the prices collected are adjusted upward to reflect the change in quantity, and the resulting price increase is reflected in the CPI as a pure price change.

When product packaging is smaller or there’s a smaller quantity but the amount you pay is the same, the CPI reflects this as a price increase.

Source: Statistics Canada, Consumer Price Index.