Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2010

Introduction to the classification

The variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2010 was developed to create groupings of countries to enable the production of integrated statistics when publishing social statistics data.

The variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics has three levels: 6 geographical macro-regions, 19 geographical sub-regions and 249 countries or areas of interest. This variant is defined in terms of countries or areas of interest in the Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2010. The hierarchical structure of the classification shows the relationship between the three levels of the classification variant.

This variant has a coding structure built on the United Nations numeric codes (NUM-3) for countries or areas. These three-digit codes are preceded by two numeric digits where the first digit represents the macro-regions and the second digit identifies the sub-regions within the macro-region; together these five-digit codes form the SCCAI code.

These groupings are based on those used historically for Statistics Canada's Census of Population, place of birth variable.

Relation to previous standard

This is a revision of the previous Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2009. The current standard, like the previous standard, is also based on the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1, and has been modified for consistency with Canadian norms. This standard includes a classification variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2010 that provides standard groupings of countries and associated codes for publication purposes. Usage notes are included with the standard.

Conformity to relevant internationally recognized standards

This standard is compatible with the composition of geographical macro-regions and geographical sub-regions of the United Nations Statistics DivisionFootnote 2; however, some differences remain. The main differences are:

  • In this standard, Bermuda is included within the sub-region Caribbean and Bermuda while it is part of Northern America in the United Nations groupings;
  • The macro-region Oceania is not further divided into sub-regions in SCCAI;
  • The West Central Asia and the Middle East is one sub-region in SCCAI while most of the countries found here are in two sub-regions: Central Asia, and Western Asia in the United Nations groupings;
  • The former Soviet Baltic republics are included with Eastern Europe in SCCAI while they are part of Northern Europe within the United Nations groupings;
  • Finally, some French sub-region names used by the United Nations have been modified in the SCCAI to make them simpler and more consistent with Canadian convention.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3166 code lists (accessed December 23, 2010).The country list accessed contains updates from Newsletters of ISO 3166-1:2006, including updates from Newsletter ISO 3166-1:2006 VI-8 published on December 15, 2010.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

United Nations Statistics Division, Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (accessed December 23, 2010).

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2009

Introduction to the classification

The variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2009 was developed to create groupings of countries to enable the production of integrated statistics when publishing social statistics data.

The variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics has three levels: 6 geographical macro-regions, 19 geographical sub-regions and 247 countries or areas of interest. This variant is defined in terms of countries or areas of interest in the Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2009. The hierarchical structure of the classification shows the relationship between the three levels of the classification variant.

This variant has a coding structure built on the United Nations numeric codes (NUM-3) for countries or areas. These three-digit codes are preceded by two numeric digits where the first digit represents the macro-regions and the second digit identifies the sub-regions within the macro-region; together these five-digit codes form the SCCAI code.

These groupings are based on those used historically for Statistics Canada's Census of Population, place of birth variable.

Relation to previous standard

This is a revision of the previous standard List of Countries, Dependencies and Other Areas of Interest. The current standard, like the previous standard, is also based on the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1, but the current standard has been modified for consistency with Canadian norms. This standard includes a classification variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2009 that provides standard groupings of countries and associated codes for publication purposes. New usage notes are included with the standard.

Conformity to relevant internationally recognized standards

This standard is compatible with the composition of geographical macro-regions and geographical sub-regions of the United Nations Statistics DivisionFootnote 2; however, some differences remain. The main differences are:

  • In this standard, Bermuda is included within the sub-region Caribbean and Bermuda while it is part of Northern America in the United Nations groupings;
  • The macro-region Oceania is not further divided into sub-regions in SCCAI;
  • The West Central Asia and the Middle East is one sub-region in SCCAI while most of the countries found here are in two sub-regions: Central Asia, and Western Asia in the United Nations groupings;
  • The former Soviet Baltic republics are included with Eastern Europe in SCCAI while they are part of Northern Europe within the United Nations groupings;
  • Finally, some French sub-region names used by the United Nations have been modified in the SCCAI to make them simpler and more consistent with Canadian convention.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3166 code lists (accessed June 24, 2010).

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

United Nations Statistics Division, Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (accessed June 24, 2010).

Return to footnote 2 referrer

National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2011

Introduction

Preface

This publication represents the third revision of the National Occupational Classification (NOC) system and the National Occupational Classification for Statistics (NOC-S). The NOC was jointly developed by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada and has been maintained in partnership since the first edition published in 1991/1992. However, until this revision, NOC and NOC-S differed in their major group structures and, consequently, in their coding systems. The publication of NOC 2011 on this twentieth anniversary of the classification system reflects the unification of the two versions. With the adoption of NOC 2011 all differences between the classifications used by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and by Statistics Canada have been eliminated. Furthermore, this has been accomplished while maintaining the advantages of both former classification versions.

NOC 2011 would not have been possible without the significant contribution of a number of individuals and groups. Their commitment to excellence is evident in this revised edition of the foundational system used for describing occupations in the Canadian labour market and for managing the collection and reporting of occupational statistics. The collaborative partnership between the two departments has ensured that the quantitative and qualitative information on occupations is reliable, timely and relevant for a wide range of audiences.

Acknowledgements

This major, structural revision of the NOC was accomplished under the guidance of Alice Born, Director of Standards Division, Statistics Canada and Christian Boucher, Director, Labour Market Information (LMI) Division of the Temporary Foreign Worker and Labour Market Information Directorate, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. Subject matter expertise was provided from Statistics Canada by Debra Mair of Standards Division and Sandra Swain of Labour Statistics Division. From Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, subject matter expertise was provided by Clara Hamory and Ian McRae of LMI Division. Service Canada's Regional Labour Market Information Directors, their staff and provincial colleagues, as well as Statistics Canada's Methods and Standards Committee and its Advisory Committee on Labour and Income Statistics provided important input to the development of NOC 2011. The many stakeholders who responded to the public online consultation for the 2011 Revision of the NOC, hosted by both departments, provided valuable input which is much appreciated.

The realization of NOC 2011 was dependent on the direct involvement and hard work of a team of occupational research analysts and assistants from both Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada. The overall process also included consultations with an Interdepartmental Committee of representatives from several government departments that are key users of the NOC. The professionalism and dedication of all those involved in the revision process is reflected in the results of this project which has unified the two variants of the classification while maintaining the advantages of both systems. This success is attributable to the co-operation between these stakeholders and to the partnership between Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada.

Statistics Canada's Internet version of this publication was created jointly by Sylvain Boucher and Niloufar Zanganeh. Their Systems Engineering Division and Administrative and Dissemination Systems Division were responsible for their systems development of the PDF and HTML versions. Human Resources and Skills Development Canada's NOC content development was undertaken by the analysts of LMI Division's Occupational Research unit and Web development by Lyne Philion, Linda Trudel and Jules-André Léger with the help of the Skills and Labour Market Information team of Innovation, Information and Technology Branch.

Both Statistics Canada and Human Resources and Skills Development Canada wish to acknowledge the valuable input of other individuals and groups too numerous to name. Research consultants, academics, professional associations, sector organizations, educators as well as employers and workers throughout the Canadian labour market provided occupational information and advice that informed this revision process. Their contribution has ensured that the quality and integrity of NOC 2011 has been maintained and it will continue to be the authoritative foundational reference and framework for occupational data and descriptive information.

Background

The National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2011 updates both the National Occupational Classification of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada's National Occupational Classification for Statistics (NOC-S) which was based on it. It is the nationally accepted taxonomy and organizational framework of occupations in the Canadian labour market. This revision represents the 20th anniversary of the classification and reflects the unification of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada's NOC and Statistics Canada's NOC-S. This revised edition eliminates the differences between the two former systems and incorporates the advantages of both. Through the collaborative partnership between Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada the department and the statistical agency introduce the revised and unified National Occupational Classification - NOC 2011.

As in the past, this revision is based on extensive occupational research, analysis and consultation conducted across the country. In the decade since its first structural revision in 2001, the labour market has evolved significantly. Technological innovation, further globalization of the economy and restructuring of the workplace have impacted many occupations. In addition to content changes, the harmonization of the NOC and the NOC-S has resulted in a new classification structure.

The NOC is designed to classify occupational information from statistical surveys. It is also used in a range of contexts to compile, analyze and communicate information about occupations. Occupational information is of critical importance for the provision of labour market and career intelligence, skills development, occupational forecasting, labour supply and demand analysis, employment equity and numerous other programs and services. It provides a standardized framework for organizing the world of work in a manageable, understandable and coherent system.

The basic principle of classification of the NOC is that of kind of work performed. Occupations are identified and grouped primarily in terms of the work usually performed, this being determined by the tasks, duties, and responsibilities of the occupation. Factors such as the materials processed or used, the industrial processes and the equipment used, the degree of responsibility and complexity of work, as well as the products made and services provided, have been taken as indicators of the work performed when combining jobs into occupations and occupations into groups.

An occupation is defined as a collection of jobs, sufficiently similar in work performed to be grouped under a common label for classification purposes. A job, in turn, encompasses all the tasks carried out by a particular worker to complete their duties.

Structure of NOC 2011

The National Occupational Classification 2011 is a four-tiered hierarchical arrangement of occupational groups with successive levels of disaggregation. It contains broad occupational categories, major, minor and unit groups.

10 broad occupational categories

Each broad occupational category has a unique one-digit code number and is composed of one or more major groups.

40 major groups

Each major group has a unique two-digit code number and is composed of one or more minor groups. The first digit of this code indicates the broad occupational category to which the major group belongs.

140 minor groups

Each minor group has a unique three-digit code number and is composed of one or more unit groups. The first two digits of this code indicate the major group to which the minor group belongs.

500 unit groups

Each unit group has a unique four-digit code. The first three digits of this code indicate the major and minor groups to which the unit group belongs.

For example:

0
Management occupations
00
Senior management occupations
001
Legislators and senior management
0011
Legislators
0012
Senior government managers and officials
0013
Senior managers - financial, communications and other business services
0014
Senior managers - health, education, social and community services and membership organizations
0015
Senior managers - trade, broadcasting and other services, n.e.c.
0016
Senior managers - construction, transportation, production and utilities

The broad occupational category code, designated by a single digit, is repeated at all levels. Major group codes are created by adding a second digit. This digit appears in the second position at all lower levels in the structure. Minor group codes add a third digit. Finally, the 4-digit unit group codes contain the digit identifying the broad occupational category, followed by the digit identifying the major group and the digit identifying the minor group and a last digit identifying the unit group.

There are approximately 40,000 occupational titles classified in the 500 unit groups of the NOC 2011. Some of these titles are clearly occupations, such as librarian and chef, while others reflect specializations within an occupational area, such as music librarian and pastry chef. Still others represent a range of jobs, such as furniture assembler and sawmill machine operator.

These titles are used to describe the work performed by many individuals holding similar jobs within an occupational area. The list of titles in the NOC is not meant to be exhaustive, but attempts to cover the most commonly used and universally understood labels that identify work in the labour market.

Abbreviations

Few abbreviations are used in this classification. Particular attention should be given to the abbreviation n.e.c. (not elsewhere classified). As an occupational qualifier it is occasionally used in the labels of major, minor and unit groups to refer to occupations not elsewhere classified; e.g. 065 Managers in customer and personal services, n.e.c. indicates that this class includes managers in customer and personal services that are not classified elsewhere in the classification.

Language

The NOC is available separately in both official languages. It is important to note that the French version includes only titles commonly used in French and proper to the milieu and, therefore, these are not normally translations of the English titles. The classification structure is the same in both languages.

Unit group labels are presented in gender-neutral format in French identifying the masculine and feminine titles separated by a slash. Where relevant, this structure is used in English as well. The illustrative example titles are also presented in gender-neutral format. The NOC descriptions are written using the masculine form as they refer to all workers within the included occupations. This has been done in order to lighten the text and to reduce reading burden.

Modifying terms

Modifying terms have been added to several job titles, as extensions, to designate the industrial sector or the domain of expertise. If applicable, this information is preceded by a dash at the end of the title (cashier supervisor - retail trade) to distinguish between similar titles. These modifying terms specify where the titles appear in the classification structure (painter - visual arts; painter - manufacture of motor vehicles). This information should be considered when coding job titles.

Format of unit group descriptions

Each NOC unit group description consists of several standardized sections which define and describe its content.

Lead statement

This section provides a general description of the content and boundaries of the unit group and indicates the main activities of occupations within the unit group. It also indicates the kinds of industries or establishments in which the occupations are found. The list of places of employment is not always exhaustive, but can assist in clarifying the occupations described and in differentiating them from occupations found in other groups.

Illustrative examplesFootnote 1 / Example titlesFootnote 2

This section is a list of titles commonly used in the labour market. The titles are intended to illustrate the contents and range of the occupational group. This is not an exhaustive list of titles.

ExclusionsFootnote 1 / Classified elsewhereFootnote 2

This section clarifies the boundaries of the unit group by identifying related unit groups and similar occupations that are classified elsewhere. Unit groups or individual occupations are cited in this section when they bear a functional similarity to the unit group or when similar titles occur.

Main duties

This section lists some of the tasks or duties performed in the occupations in the unit group. Depending on the contents of the unit group, one of three formats is used.

  • A series of statements that can be applied to all occupations in the unit group. This format was selected for unit groups that contain a single core occupation, such as 1242 Legal administrative assistants and 2146 Aerospace engineers. This format was also selected for unit groups that contain a range of related titles that nevertheless share a set of common duties, such as 1411 General office support workers and 9417 Machining tool operators.
  • Two or more sub-sets of occupations with a series of statements that apply to each component. This format was selected for unit groups that consist of two or more sub-components which, while similar enough to be in the same unit group, can be described separately. Examples of unit groups with this format are 3141 Audiologists and speech-language pathologists and 5125 Translators, terminologists and interpreters.
  • A series of brief descriptive statements that are linked to specific occupations within a group. This format was selected for unit groups that contain a series of occupations which, while similar enough to be in the same unit group, can be described separately. Examples of unit groups with this format include 4423 By-law enforcement and other regulatory officers, n.e.c. and 5226 Other technical and co-ordinating occupations in motion pictures, broadcasting and the performing arts.

For some unit groups, a statement appears at the end of the tasks performed or main duties section, identifying specializations that exist within the occupational area encompassed by the unit group.

Employment requirements

This section describes the employment requirements for the unit group. Several types of requirements are identified in this section and are listed in the following order.

  • Type and level of formal education: for example, secondary school, college diploma, university degree. Efforts were made to be as specific as possible, though many unit groups have a range of acceptable educational requirements.
  • Specific training: for example, apprenticeship training, on-the-job training, training courses specific to an occupation.
  • Experience in another occupation: for example, supervisors usually require several years of experience in the occupation that they supervise.
  • Licences, certificates or registration: for example, regulatory requirements to practice in a regulated profession, special licenses to operate certain kinds of vehicles.
  • Other requirements: for example, athletic ability or artistic talent.

Note: Some occupations are designated as regulated professions and trades. Regulations are subject to change and may vary across jurisdictions. The most reliable information on regulatory requirements for occupations is found on the Web sites of provincial regulatory organizations and licensing authorities.

The Employment requirements section does not attempt to describe personal suitability requirements that are assessed by employers as part of the hiring process.

Some occupations have very definite employment requirements while for others, there is no consensus or a range of acceptable requirements exist. To reflect this variation in the labour market, this section describes employment requirements using the following terminology:

  • "... is required" - to indicate a definite requirement;
  • "... is usually required" - to indicate something that is usually required by the majority of employers, but not always required by all employers; and
  • "... may be required" - to indicate something that may be required by some employers, but on a less frequent basis.

Note: For reasons of brevity, in this section the term college includes the following types of post-secondary institutions: community colleges, CÉGEPS, technical institutes, trade schools and agricultural colleges. Where relevant, in some provinces, it may also include private training organizations, music conservatories and other non-degree granting institutions.

Additional information

This section appears in some unit group descriptions. It provides information on the following:

  • progression to other occupations (such as supervisory or management positions) based on transferability of skills from acquired occupational experience;
  • mobility patterns, such as inter- and intra-occupational transferability of skills (for example, identifying occupations that are part of internal lines of progression or specializations within a subject matter area);
  • trends and forthcoming changes in the unit group's employment requirements; and
  • other information to clarify and define the unit group.

Related classifications: NAICS, Class of Worker

The classification of occupations does not stand alone but must be understood as being related to other classifications, such as the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and that of Class of Worker. Each of these classifications supplements the NOC 2011 in presenting a rounded picture of the nature of a person's job.

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

The industrial qualifier which may accompany the job title:

  1. Indicates the type of economic activity with which the job is usually associated. (It is important to note that the assignment of an industrial qualifier does not necessarily limit a job to that industry. These qualifiers are merely indicative of the possible areas of activity in which the job may be found.)
  2. Permits the assignment of similar occupational titles to different occupation groups where the duties vary between industries.
  3. Aids in defining the specific occupations and helps the coder grasp the underlying principles of this classification.

The industry in which the individual is employed is determined by the kind of economic activity of the establishment. The establishment is usually a factory, mine, farm, store, other place of business or an institution for which a number of basic production variables can be compiled.

It is important to note the conceptual differences between an industry classification and an occupation classification. An establishment can employ individuals performing completely different occupations, and these are classified to appropriate occupational groups, but the industrial classification of each individual employed in the establishment should be the same and is determined by the nature of the product made or service rendered. In other words, the nature of the factory, business or service in which the person is employed does not determine the classification of the occupation, except to the extent that it enables the nature of the duties to be more clearly defined.

Class of Worker

Class of worker refers to an individual's employment relationship to the business in which he or she works, as employee or self employed, including unpaid family worker, and thus provides another means of describing the work. The NOC 2011 does not indicate the class of worker classification for each occupation since many occupations contain both jobs held by employees and jobs of self-employed individuals. However, a general rule has been established for coding purposes and is discussed in full under the section on Coding.


NOC 2011

NOC 2011 replaces the National Occupational Classification (NOC) of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada's National Occupational Classification for Statistics (NOC-S). These classifications were revised jointly by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada every 5 years according to the census cycle. The maintenance of the classification alternates between minor updates and structural revisions. Only in 10-year structural revisions are such changes considered as: the creation of new classes, the collapsing of classes, the moving of classes in the structure or the moving of content between classes.

The 2011 revision represents a major structural realignment. A key objective of this revision was to harmonize the coding structures and eliminate all other differences between the two classifications, fulfilling a request heard from users of both the NOC and the NOC-S. The result is the unified NOC 2011 which was developed through the joint efforts of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada and will be used by both.

Separate concordance tables explain the revisions to both classification systems that have resulted in the harmonized classification structure for NOC 2011.

In addition to these changes, for NOC 2011, a new variant of the classification has been developed at a high level of aggregation. It is designed to better support the analysis of highly aggregated data (See: Variant for highly aggregated data).

Citation

The National Occupation Classification 2011 is a joint product of Statistics Canada and Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. The appropriate department should be cited when materials are used. The structure, class labels, class definitions (lead statements), example titles and exclusions were jointly developed and are to be attributed to both departments. The content of the main duties, employment requirements and additional information sections as well as the theoretical framework and the accompanying definitions of skill level and skill type are the intellectual property of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and are to be attributed to the department when cited.

Comparison of NOC 2006 and NOC-S 2006 to NOC 2011

The major difference between the NOC and the NOC-S had been the greater use in the NOC of skill level as a classification criterion. Whereas the NOC organized occupations by 10 skill types and four skill levels, NOC-S relied more on skill type in defining its major groups. The NOC 2011 uses the organizational structure of the NOC (See: NOC Classification criteria).

In order to incorporate skill level as an organizational principle, several major groups from NOC-S 2006 were changed and a new coding structure reflecting the skill type by skill level numerical coding of the NOC was adopted. The relationship between the major groups of NOC 2011 and NOC-S 2006 is detailed in the concordance tables (See: NOC 2011 - NOC-S 2006 and NOC-S 2006 - NOC 2011).

In order to provide at the major group level a comparable level of detail to that which had been provided by the NOC-S major groups, the number of major groups was increased from the 26 major groups of NOC 2006 to 40 major groups in NOC 2011. The relationship between the major groups of NOC 2011 and NOC 2006 is detailed in the concordance tables (See: NOC 2006 - NOC 2011).

The unit group descriptions of NOC 2011 contain all the types of information carried in NOC 2006. In comparison to NOC-S 2006, users will find additional information on the activities performed by workers in each unit group and a section related to educational and/or training requirements for entering an occupation. These sections provide further information on the nature of the jobs included in each unit group, help to code job titles to the correct class and help identify the relative distinctions between skill levels for occupations.

The NOC and NOC-S had also differed in their treatment of military personnel. The NOC classified military personnel whose occupations had a civilian counterpart in the group appropriate to that civilian occupation. The NOC-S classified all military personnel on the basis of rank to one of two unit groups: one for commissioned officers and one for other ranks. NOC 2011 follows the approach used in NOC-S, with all military personnel being classified to either 0433 Commissioned officers of the Canadian Forces or 4313 Non-commissioned ranks of the Canadian Forces. The adoption of the NOC-S approach allowed this difference to be resolved with no impact on the historical comparability of data.

In this structural revision, various changes were also made at the unit group level to enable the classification to continue to provide a framework for the provision of relevant and reliable information on the occupational structure of Canada. New unit groups have been formed either by combining unit groups or parts of unit groups from 2006 and content has been moved between skill types and levels. The full relationship between the unit groups of NOC 2011 and those of NOC and NOC-S 2006 is presented in the concordances, but some highlights are noted here.

Some unit groups were moved to better reflect the skill type of the work performed. For example, Loan officers, Customer service representatives - financial, and Customer service, information and related clerks all moved from Business to Sales and service. Public relations and communications professionals moved from Art and culture to Business. Protective service occupations, including the military, police and firefighters, moved from Sales and service to Government services. Care providers and educational assistants moved from Sales and service to Community and education services. Certain trades, including upholsterers and tailors, moved from Trades and equipment to Services. As a final example, Power system, station and auxiliary equipment operators moved from Trades and equipment operators to Utilities.

In other cases, only part of a group was moved. For example, legal assistants moved out of Paralegal and related occupations, in Law, into Legal administrative assistants, in Business. Advertising and marketing managers moved out of Sales, marketing and advertising managers, in Sales, into Advertising, marketing and public relations managers, in Business services. Similarly, Library assistants moved from Library and archive technicians and assistants, in Education, law and social, community and government services, to Library assistants and clerks, in Business, finance and administration.

Other unit groups were moved to better reflect the occupation's current skill level. For example, the group for Non-commissioned ranks of the Canadian Forces was moved from skill level C to skill level B to recognize the training that occurs post-recruitment. Water and waste treatment plant operators also moved from skill level C to B due to the changing requirements associated with this occupation. Farmers and farm managers were moved into management to recognize the significant management component in these occupations.

As was the case with skill type, here also there were cases where only part of a unit group was moved. For example, midwives were moved from skill level B to skill level A into a new unit group, Allied primary health practitioners. Pharmacy technicians and physiotherapy assistants moved from skill level C to skill level B, now included, respectively, in Other medical technologists and technicians (except dental health) and Other technical occupations in therapy and assessment.

Finally, some unit groups were combined. Administrative clerks were merged with General office clerks due to the increasing similarity in the job titles and work performed in these two unit groups. In other cases, particularly in manufacturing, unit groups that have been declining in size were combined with related groups.

In addition to these structural changes, the 2011 revision also provided an opportunity to add many new job titles in order to reflect changing terminology and new technology in the workplace and the rise of new occupations and specializations. Too numerous to list, these additions included titles ranging from oil and gas contractor to mystery shopper and from physician assistant to seismic buried facilities locator.

NOC classification criteria

The two major attributes of jobs used as classification criteria in developing the NOC are skill type and skill level. A description of skill levels is presented first as the definitions of skill types incorporate some information related to the concept of skill level. Other factors, such as industry and occupational mobility, are also taken into consideration.

Skill level

Skill level is defined generally as the amount and type of education and training required to enter and perform the duties of an occupation. In determining skill level, the experience required for entry, and the complexity and responsibilities typical of an occupation are also considered in relation to other occupations.

Four skill level categories are identified in the NOC. Each major, minor and unit group is assigned to one of the skill levels.

The skill level categories are broad aggregates, reflecting four commonly accepted educational, training or preparatory routes for entering employment. Requirements for individual unit groups or occupations may overlap between the boundaries of the skill levels. For example, some occupations can be entered with either a university degree or a college diploma. When the entry requirements for a unit group or occupation reflect a range of possible educational and training specifications, skill level placement of the group was determined by considering several factors. These include the requirements most generally demanded by employers, the minor group context, complexity of overall responsibilities and knowledge requirements as well as further training and specialization acquired on the job.

The classification describes the educational and training requirements for occupations. However, the education and experience of particular job incumbents may not correspond exactly to the level described. Individuals may be over-qualified for their work or they may work in occupations for which the entry requirements have changed after they became employed.

It is important to note that the skill level categories are not intended to designate socio-economic status or prestige. Rather they are intended to reflect actual occupational entry requirements. These requirements are expressed in terms of the formal educational system and other types of training specified by employers.

Management occupations, while considered a skill type, are assigned to the skill level A category. These occupations are at the top of organizational hierarchies and as such, are characterized by high levels of responsibility, accountability and subject matter expertise gained through either formal education or extensive occupational experience. Management occupations span the entire classification structure and are found in all sectors or areas of the labour market. A range of factors are taken into consideration as determinants for employment in management occupations.

The skill level categories of the NOC are outlined and defined below.

NOC skill level criteria - education/training and other criteria

Skill level A

  • University degree (bachelor's, master's or doctorate)

Skill level B

  • Two to three years of post-secondary education at community college, institute of technology or CÉGEP

    or
  • Two to five years of apprenticeship training

    or
  • Three to four years of secondary school and more than two years of on-the-job training, occupation-specific training courses or specific work experience
  • Occupations with supervisory responsibilities are also assigned to skill level B.
  • Occupations with significant health and safety responsibilities (e.g., fire fighters, police officers and licensed practical nurses) are assigned to skill level B.

Skill level C

  • Completion of secondary school and some short-duration courses or training specific to the occupation

    or
  • Some secondary school education, with up to two years of on-the-job training, training courses or specific work experience

Skill level D

  • Short work demonstration or on-the-job training

    or
  • No formal educational requirements

Skill level is referenced in the code for all occupations with the exception of management occupations. For all non-management occupations the second digit of the numerical code corresponds to skill level. Skill levels are identified as follows: level A - 0 or 1; level B - 2 or 3; level C - 4 or 5; and level D - 6 or 7.

Skill type

Skill type is defined as the type of work performed, although other factors related to skill type are also reflected in the NOC. One of these factors is similarity with respect to the educational discipline or field of study required for entry into an occupation. Another factor is the industry of employment where experience within an internal job ladder or within a specific industry is usually a prerequisite for entry. The 10 skill types, 0 to 9, are presented below and are also identified in the first digit of the NOC numerical code for all occupations.

The ten broad occupational categories of the NOC are based on skill type

0. Management occupations

This skill type category contains legislators, senior management occupations and middle management occupations. While management occupations are defined as a skill type, they are also found throughout all other skill type areas of the classification. The first digit of the code for all management occupations is 0.

These occupations are considered to be at the top of the organizational hierarchy of workplaces or businesses. Decision-making that affects the organization as a whole, or departments within organizations, is undertaken by management. As such, management is characterized by high levels of responsibility, accountability and subject matter expertise. Expertise is acquired through either formal education or extensive occupational experience. For these reasons all management occupations in the NOC 2011 are also included within skill level A.

1. Business, finance and administration occupations

This category contains occupations that are concerned with providing financial and business services, administrative and regulatory services and clerical supervision and support services. Some occupations in this category are unique to the financial and business service sectors; however, most are found in all industries.

Often, occupations at skill levels A and B are supplied from educational programs specific to the profession or occupation. Some occupations at skill level B are also supplied from experienced workers in related administrative support occupations.

2. Natural and applied sciences and related occupations

This category contains professional and technical occupations in the sciences, including physical and life sciences, engineering, architecture and information technology.

Occupations in this skill type category require post-secondary education in an appropriate scientific discipline. Progression from occupations in skill level B to occupations in skill level A is usually dependent on completion of additional formal education.

3. Health occupations

This category includes occupations concerned with providing health care services directly to patients and occupations that provide support to professional and technical staff. Most occupations in this skill type category require post-secondary education in a related health care program. Progression from occupations in skill level B to occupations in skill level A is usually dependent on completion of additional formal education. Occupations in skill level C require short training programs.

4. Occupations in education, law and social, community and government services

This skill type category includes a range of occupations that are concerned with law, public protective services, teaching, counselling, conducting social science research, developing government policy, and administering government and other programs.

Occupations in this skill type category usually require completion of a related post-secondary program. Progression from occupations in skill level B to occupations in skill level A is not usually possible without completion of additional formal education.

5. Occupations in art, culture, recreation and sport

This skill type category includes professional and technical occupations related to art and culture, including the performing arts, film and video, broadcasting, journalism, writing, creative design, libraries and museums. It also includes occupations in recreation and sport.

This category is characterized by occupations which are linked by subject matter to formal post-secondary educational programs but which have, for the most part, a range of acceptable qualifications. Occupations in this category are also characterized by a requirement for creative talent, such as for designers and performers, or for athletic ability. Unit groups for occupations that usually require university graduation in a professional discipline, such as journalism or library science, have been classified in skill level A. Most others have been classified in skill level B in recognition of the wide range of entry routes that are possible.

6. Sales and service occupations

This skill type category contains sales occupations, personal services and security service occupations, and occupations related to the hospitality and tourism industries.

Occupations in skill level B of this category can be linked, for the most part, to formal post-secondary or occupation-specific training programs. Others are characterized by periods of formal on-the-job training other than apprenticeship. Progression from occupations in skill level C or D to those in skill level B usually require completion of related training programs. Some progression through experience is possible for supervisory positions.

7. Trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations

This skill type category includes construction and mechanical trades, trades supervisors and contractors and operators of transportation and heavy equipment. These occupations are found in a wide range of industrial sectors, with many occurring in the construction and transportation industries.

This category includes most of the apprenticeable trades, including all of those related to the construction industry. Other occupations in this category usually require completion of college or other programs combined with on-the-job training. Progression to supervisory or self-employed contractor status is possible with experience. There is limited mobility or transferability of skills among occupations in this category due to specific apprenticeship, training and licensing requirements for most occupations.

8. Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations

This category contains supervisory and equipment operation occupations in the natural resource-based sectors of mining, oil and gas production, forestry and logging, agriculture, horticulture and fishing. Most occupations in this category are industry specific and do not occur outside of the primary industries.

Occupations within skill level B of this category generally require completion of college or other post-secondary training programs. Some, however, are characterized by industry-based training and progression through experience.

9. Occupations in manufacturing and utilities

This category contains supervisory and production occupations in manufacturing, processing and utilities.

Occupations in this category are characterized by internal progression and on-the-job training. Workers typically start out in these occupations at entry-level positions and progress to increasingly higher skilled occupations through experience. Mobility between employers or industries may be limited by seniority provisions of collective agreements. The occupations in skill level B of this category are increasingly technical in nature and post-secondary training programs are required for some.

Industry

Industry and occupation are separate variables which can be cross-tabulated to provide detailed information on employment. However, many occupations are found almost solely within one particular industry. For example, mining and automobile assembly occupations occur each within their respective industrial sectors.

During the original research and development of the NOC, it was realized that in many industries, occupational mobility is determined more by internal job ladders than by functional specialization. In consequence, some unit groups include workers of a particular skill level within a specific industry. Although the occupational categorisation resembles in part an industrial categorisation, the variables remain separate and distinct.

Industry was used in the development of classification categories for senior management occupations, for occupations in natural resources, agriculture and related production and for occupations in manufacturing and utilities.

Occupational mobility

In developing the NOC, an effort was made to consider mobility or transferability of skills between occupations. The objective was to develop unit groups where the potential for mobility, or substitution of workers, would be greater within the group than between groups. Movement within groups usually follows when the group is homogeneous in skill level and skill type, indicating increased potential for transferability of competencies and development of specialization. Movement between groups, or inter-occupational mobility, usually reflects a change in skill level (e.g., vertical mobility) or a change in skill type (e.g., acquisition of new responsibilities and diversified skills).

The degree of occupational mobility that exists for unit groups varies. Many unit group descriptions include a statement that indicates the potential for, and type of, mobility that characterizes the unit group.

Other classification considerations

In addition to the previously mentioned criteria, other factors were considered in determining the boundaries between unit groups and the contents of each group. These additional factors were the size of the unit groups and the codability or operational feasibility of the groups. Codability relates to the ease of accurately coding or assigning reported job titles from survey respondents to the occupational groups of the classification.

The size (or estimated number of workers) of the unit group was considered for reasons of statistical reliability and confidentiality. Generally, unit groups which contain fewer than 1,000 Canadian workers have not been delineated.

Because the NOC structure is used to code responses to the National Household Survey and other surveys, it must provide a set of unit groups that can be used for this operational application. The insufficient precision of some survey responses and ambiguities of language were given consideration in finalizing the unit groups.

The NOC Matrix

A matrix classifying the NOC major and minor groups has been developed to provide an overview of the entire classification and to show the organization of the groups by both skill type and skill level.

There are 10 skill types in the NOC identified as 0 to 9. The vertical columns of the matrix correspond to nine of the 10 skill type categories with the exception of management. Management, the first skill type or 0, is organized across the top of the matrix and spans all nine skill types as it is found within all occupational sectors or categories. The first digit of each code identifies the major and minor group as belonging to one of the ten skill type categories, 0 to 9.

The horizontal rows of the matrix correspond to the four skill level categories. Management occupations are by default included in the skill level A category. For all non-management occupations, the second digit of each code identifies the major and minor group as belonging to one of the four skill level categories.

Within each cell of the matrix, the major and minor groups that belong to each skill type and skill level category are listed. Management occupations are the exception, which span all skill type categories and are included in skill level A. The second digit of management occupations identifies the occupational sector of management, for example 031 Managers in health care. (See: Matrix).

Issues and conventions of the NOC

Some of the many issues that were encountered in the development of the NOC and the conventions adopted in response are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Management occupations

Management occupations present a special problem for reliable coding of occupational survey responses. In many cases there is little indication of the level of responsibility, the size of the enterprise or division managed, or the field of specialization.

To be of practical use, a classification of managers must be a compromise between the theoretically optimal and the practical solutions.

Senior management occupations (in major group 00) have been divided on the basis of industry of employment into six unit groups.

Middle and other management occupations are divided into three major groups, 18 minor groups and 42 unit groups on the basis of specialization (e.g., Purchasing managers) or industry of employment (e.g., Postal and courier services managers). In certain cases (e.g., Managers in transportation) groups defined by industry also contain managers in that specialization regardless of their industry of employment.

Supervisors

Supervisors and foremen/women have generally been classified in skill level B.

In most cases, professional and technical occupations are supervised by managerial or professional personnel respectively. However, where supervisors are identified for professional and technical groups, they are generally classified in the same unit groups as the occupations supervised.

Supervisors in the following occupational categories have been classified in supervisor unit groups or minor groups separate from the workers supervised:

  • administrative services occupations
  • nursing occupations
  • sales and service occupations
  • trades and transport and equipment operators
  • occupations in natural resources and agriculture
  • occupations in manufacturing and utilities.

Most minor and unit groups in the occupational categories listed above have a corresponding supervisory group. Occasionally, as in minor group 431, Occupations in front-line public protection services, supervision is provided by managers and there are no corresponding supervisory groups in major group 43.

Trades

All apprenticeable trades are included in skill level B. Their inclusion does not imply an exact equivalence of skill between all trades, but rather that they occupy a range that lies within the boundaries of this skill level category. Information on entry requirements is provided within each unit group description.

Inspectors, testers and graders

Generally, inspectors who require post-secondary education have been classified in separate unit groups in skill level B or with technicians and technologists, also in skill level B. Other non-technical inspectors, testers, graders and samplers have been included either in separate unit groups covering occupations in processing industries or in unit groups of assemblers and fabricators in manufacturing industries. This is reflective of patterns of employment found within industries and the increasing responsibility for quality control that is placed on manufacturing production workers.

Apprentices and trainees

Apprentices and trainees have been classified in the same unit groups as the occupations for which they are training. Similarly, interns, residents and articling students are classified with their respective professional groups.

This convention has been adopted of necessity to prevent a proliferation of unit groups of apprentices. It is not intended to imply equivalence or interchangeability of apprentices or trainees with fully qualified workers.

NOC 2011 coding system

As indicated previously, the first two digits of each code convey meaning with respect to the group's skill type and skill level category.

For all occupations, including management, the first digit of each code identifies the major, minor and unit group as belonging to one of the skill type categories. For all non-management occupations, the second digit of each code identifies the major, minor and unit group as belonging to one of the four skill level categories.

For management occupations, the first two digits also convey meaning. The first digit is always 0 to convey management, while the second digit conveys the skill type category in which the management occupation is found. All management occupations are included as part of skill level A.

The following charts summarize and illustrate the meanings embedded in the coding system.

Classification structure by the skill type category
The skill type category is... when the first digit is...
Management occupations 0
Business, finance and administration occupations 1
Natural and applied sciences and related occupations 2
Health occupations 3
Occupations in education, law and social, community and government services 4
Occupations in art, culture, recreation and sport 5
Sales and service occupations 6
Trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations 7
Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations 8
Occupations in manufacturing and utilities 9
Skill type category
The skill level category is... when the second digit is...
Skill Level A 0 or 1
Skill Level B 2 or 3
Skill Level C 4 or 5
Skill Level D 6 or 7

Important note: For management, the first digit is always 0. Senior managers in major group 00 are generally managers of middle managers, therefore the second digit is also 0. For middle management occupations, the second digit represents the skill type categories, from 1 to 9, as above. All management occupations are included in skill level A.

Examples of codes and their meaning
Code Meaning
9231 The first digit indicates skill type category 9, Occupations in manufacturing and utilities. The second digit indicates skill level category B.
6533 The first digit indicates skill type category 6, Sales and service occupations. The second digit indicates skill level category C.
0212 The first digit 0 always indicates a management occupation. All management occupations are part of skill level A. The second digit indicates management in skill type category 2, Natural and applied sciences and related occupations.

Variant for highly aggregated data

A variant of NOC 2011 has been developed jointly by Statistics Canada and Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. It is based on a review of actual practices in the analysis of highly aggregated occupational data, consideration of the highest aggregation level in the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) and consultation with potential users.

The variant consists of 10 groupings, from a. to j., that are a convenient and useful way to summarize and analyse more detailed classes. The first three classes are homogeneous on skill level. The remaining classes focus on skill type. All classes consist of entire major groups; no major group is split between classes of the variant.

Variant Aggregation Structure

Variant Aggregation Structure
Variant classes Major groups included
a. Management
  • 00 Senior management occupations
  • 01-05 Specialized middle management occupations
  • 06 Middle management occupations in retail and wholesale trade and customer services
  • 07-09 Middle management occupations in trades, transportation, production and utilities
b. Professional
  • 11 Professional occupations in business and finance
  • 21 Professional occupations in natural and applied sciences
  • 30 Professional occupations in nursing
  • 31 Professional occupations in health (except nursing)
  • 40 Professional occupations in education services
  • 41 Professional occupations in law and social, community and government services
  • 51 Professional occupations in art and culture
c. Technical and paraprofessional
  • 22 Technical occupations related to natural and applied sciences
  • 32 Technical occupations in health
  • 42 Paraprofessional occupations in legal, social, community and education services
  • 43 Occupations in front-line public protection services
  • 52 Technical occupations in art, culture, recreation and sport
d. Administration and administrative support
  • 12 Administrative and financial supervisors and administrative occupations
  • 13 Finance, insurance and related business administrative occupations
  • 14 Office support occupations
  • 15 Distribution, tracking and scheduling co-ordination occupations
e. Sales
  • 62 Retail sales supervisors and specialized sales occupations
  • 64 Sales representatives and salespersons - wholesale and retail trade
  • 66 Sales support occupations
f. Personal and customer information services
  • 63 Service supervisors and specialized service occupations
  • 65 Service representatives and other customer and personal services occupations
  • 67 Service support and other service occupations, n.e.c.
  • 34 Assisting occupations in support of health services
  • 44 Care providers and educational, legal and public protection support occupations
g. Industrial, construction and equipment operation trades
  • 72 Industrial, electrical and construction trades
  • 73 Maintenance and equipment operation trades
h. Workers and labourers in transport and construction
  • 74 Other installers, repairers and servicers and material handlers
  • 75 Transport and heavy equipment operation and related maintenance occupations
  • 76 Trades helpers, construction labourers and related occupations
i. Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations
  • 82 Supervisors and technical occupations in natural resources, agricultural and related production
  • 84 Workers in natural resources, agriculture and related production
  • 86 Harvesting, landscaping and natural resources labourers
j. Occupations in manufacturing and utilities
  • 92 Processing, manufacturing and utilities supervisors and central control operators
  • 94 Processing and manufacturing machine operators and related production workers
  • 95 Assemblers in manufacturing
  • 96 Labourers in processing, manufacturing and utilities

Coding

The NOC provides an overall structure for classifying occupations according to kind of work performed. The lists of example titles are merely indicative of the types of occupations that fit within specific unit groups. The lists of example titles are not exhaustive nor are they intended to be.

When coding an occupation, all the relevant facts about the job and its environment should be obtained. These include the kind of work performed, the most important activities or duties, the job titles, the kind of business, industry or service, and the class of worker described earlier. The more complete and comprehensive the information the coder is able to assemble about the duties performed by a worker on a particular job, the easier it will be to determine the appropriate classification.

To code an occupation, it is possible to start with either the classification structure or the search tool.

Using the structure

When using the structure, it is best to exploit the hierarchical nature of the classification. First the broad occupational category (skill type) which seems most likely to contain the job should be identified. Next the most appropriate major group within the broad occupational category should be found. Skill level can also provide a guide to locating major groups by considering titles with terms such as "technical", "supervisor", "helper", and "labourer". The process should be continued to find the most appropriate minor group within the major group selected. Finally the most appropriate unit group within the minor group selected should be identified. The unit group definition should be read carefully before deciding if this unit group offers the best possible classification. In addition, the example titles listed for the unit group should be examined to ensure that the choice is actually the best.

Using the NOC search tool

  1. First search for the occupation. This can be done by searching using a key part of the occupation title and reviewing the search results to find the four-digit code that contains the occupation sought. Check whether the title appears in any other four-digit code listed. If it does, the corresponding industrial qualifiers should be checked and the one which relates most closely to the one stated by the respondent selected. Using this code, go to the unit group. Read its definition carefully as well as the list of example titles before deciding whether it is the most appropriate classification. Also consult the list of Exclusions for similar occupations that are classified elsewhere.
  2. If the occupation title cannot be found or if the definition appears inappropriate, enter another title in the search. Some suggestions are:
    1. Look for the noun form: answering the phone will be a Receptionist or Telephone clerk
    2. Shorten the title: Electronic data processor to Data processor
    3. Find a synonym: Aircraft mechanic for Aircraft maintenance technician
    4. If the title is inverted, look for it in its natural order e.g. Manager, store may be located using Store manager
  3. Also consider such factors as:
    1. Job location - tunnel worker; bridge keeper
    2. Kind of machines used - cement-mixer operator; hydraulic riveter
    3. Material used - concrete mason; leather handbag maker
    4. Subject matter - music cataloguer; press clipper
    5. Activity performed - locomotive inspector; body shop foreman/woman
    6. Job skills - surgical instrument repairer; tool machinist

Coding procedures for problem responses

The procedure described above assumes responses contain sufficient information for coding. Unfortunately, depending upon the survey methods used, some responses may be problematic. This occurs when the information in the response is either vague or contradictory. Experience at Statistics Canada suggests the following approaches to resolving such problems.

Coding vague responses

It is suggested that vague responses be coded only to the level within the classification that is possible. Of course, before doing so, any information that is available about the respondent should be consulted.

Using education in coding

This is especially useful in coding occupational responses that are vague. The most reliable way of using education is as an exclusionary edit. Certain occupations require a minimum education and it is possible to exclude vague responses from being coded to such occupations if the respondent does not have the minimum education required. Great care must be taken when using education in occupational coding and it should only be used as a last resort.

Coding when the response contains contradictory information

Sometimes the responses will give an occupational title and a description of work performed that are contradictory. A response "labourer, driving dump truck" is contradictory in terms of the classification, as driving a truck is not considered elemental work. This response should be coded as a truck driver in 7511 Transport truck drivers.

In general, it is best to let the description of the work performed predominate over occupational titles when coding.

Some occupational titles can be misleading. Titles that have manager as part of the title are sometimes not managers. For example, project managers and case managers are usually not managers and must be coded based on a description of their work. Special care must be given to responses that have manager, labourer, or consultant as part of the title as these terms have a variety of meanings in the workplace.

Coding responses containing two or more occupations

Where two or more occupations are reported in reply to a question on occupation, the first one mentioned should be coded unless there is additional information to suggest otherwise.


Classification rules

Managers

Managers are usually classified to the broad occupational category 0 Management Occupations. Within this category the senior managers that are the top of a management hierarchy as denoted by terms such as president, chief executive officer, etc. are classified in major group 00 Senior management occupations.

Managers with a management specialty, such as human resource management, are classified according to specialty in major group 01-05 Specialized middle management occupations. However, senior managers with a specialist responsibility would be classified with senior management in major group 00 Senior management occupations.

An attempt has been made to isolate many of the managers of small businesses by classifying managers of retail stores, restaurants, hotels and similar businesses in a separate major group 06 Middle management occupations in retail and wholesale trade.

All other managers are classified according to the type of business managed within major group 07-09 Middle management occupations in trades, transportation, production and utilities.

Proprietors

As a general rule, the class of worker status, that is, whether the respondent works for wages or is self-employed, is not considered for classification purposes. An exception is made for proprietors in retail trade, food and accommodation services and residential home building. These are classified as managers to the following unit groups:

0621
Retail and wholesale trade managers
0631
Restaurant and food service managers
0632
Accommodation service managers
0712
Home building and renovation managers

Contractors

Contractors are classified in several areas of the classification. General contractors in construction are classified in unit group 0711 Construction managers. Renovation contractors and home building contractors are classified in unit group 0712 Home building and renovation managers.

Contractors specializing in a specific trade such as plumbing, electrical, carpentry, etc., are classified together with supervisors to the appropriate unit group for that trade. That is, a plumbing contractor is classified to unit group 7203 Contractors and supervisors, pipefitting trades.

Supervisors and foremen/women

Supervisors are classified to separate unit groups for supervisors where they exist. These are found in the following minor groups for supervisors:

121
Administrative services supervisors
621
Retail sales supervisors
631
Service supervisors
720
Contractors and supervisors, industrial, electrical and construction trades and related workers
730
Contractors and supervisors, maintenance trades and heavy equipment and transport operators
821
Supervisors, logging and forestry
822
Contractors and supervisors, mining, oil and gas
825
Contractors and supervisors, agriculture, horticulture and related operations and services
921
Supervisors, processing and manufacturing occupations
922
Supervisors, assembly and fabrication

This unit group for supervisors is found outside of the supervisor minor groups:

3011
Nursing co-ordinators and supervisors

Where a separate unit group does not exist, supervisors are classified with the workers supervised. For example, in most professional major groups there are no separate unit groups for supervisors, the one exception being unit group 3011 Nursing co-ordinators and supervisors.

Technical occupations follow a similar rule and there are no separate unit groups for supervisors in this area.

Even where separate supervisory unit groups exist, "lead hands" are not classified to them as previous research has indicated that supervision is usually only a minor part of such jobs.

Apprentices

Apprentices are classified within the groups for tradesmen/women. For example an apprentice carpenter is classified to the appropriate trade group, unit group 7271 Carpenters.

Helpers

Helpers are usually considered as labourers. Most helpers will be found in the building trades such as carpenter's helper, mason's helper, roofer's helper, etc. These jobs are not to be confused with formal apprenticeships and are not classified as tradesmen/women but are classified to unit group 7611 Construction trades helpers and labourers.

Labourers

Labourers are classified in separate unit groups in the following major groups:

76
Trades helpers, construction labourers and related occupations
86
Harvesting, landscaping and natural resources labourers
96
Labourers in processing, manufacturing and utilities

Sample questions for obtaining occupation information

The following questions indicate the type of information and the format that could be used to obtain the facts necessary to classify an occupation.

  1. For whom did you work?
    • Name of firm, government agency, etc.
  2. What kind of business, industry or service was this?

    Please give details. For example: primary school, municipal police, wheat farm, shoe store.
  3. What was your work or occupation?

    Please be specific. For example: plumber, fishing guide, wood furniture assembler, secondary school teacher. (If in the armed forces, give rank).
  4. In this work, what were your main activities?

    Please give details. For example: installed residential plumbing, guided fishing parties, made wood furniture products, taught mathematics.
  5. In this job or business, were you mainly:
    • Working for wages, salary, tips or commission?
    • Working without pay for your spouse or another relative in a family farm or business?
    • Self-employed without paid help (alone or in a partnership)?
    • Self-employed with paid help (alone or in a partnership)?

More information on the NOC

For information on the National Occupational Classification (NOC) and its use for programs and services such as, immigrating to Canada, labour market information, job searches and working in Canada, please contact Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

This heading is used by Statistics Canada.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

This heading is used by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Notice of introduction of a new aggregation structure for the classification of imports and exports of goods

May 29, 2012 (Previous notice)

This is an information notice.

On August 8 2011, Statistics Canada announced its intention to introduce a new classification structure to present import and export statistics in various programs. The notice below revises the previous one as follows:

  • A few group and class titles are changed to better reflect their intended coverage
  • One class is eliminated
  • A few changes are made to code numbers
  • The implementation schedule has been updated

Introduction

Statistics Canada will introduce a new classification structure to organize and present import and export statistics in various programs. The new structure will replace the classification structures known as the summary import groups (SIG) and the summary export groups (SEG) that have been in use for several decades.

The new structure builds a bridge between the Canadian Export Classification (CEC), Customs Tariff (CT) and the Input-output commodity classification (IOCC). The main objectives of the new system are to better integrate import and export statistics in the System of National Accounts and update the presentation of import and export statistics.

The links below provide a description of the current practices regarding the classification of goods in the Canadian statistical system, of the new aggregation structure, of the advantages and limitations of the new system and, the implementation schedule.

The reader should note that the introduction of this aggregation structure is only a first step towards improved harmonization of commodity statistics. It launches a new approach that will be fully implemented in the 2012 Canadian version of the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS). The link below leads to more information on that project.

The current situation

Statistics on goods are based on several classification systems. In the domain of statistics on the supply and use of goods, some of the key classifications are the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods, the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff (CT). There is no standard system or aggregation structure integrating these classifications. The new system seeks to fill this gap.

In the Canadian statistical system, the input-output accounts integrate product statistics into a coherent system that describes the supply and use of goods, services and production factors in our economy. This framework underlies the new classification system.

The new classification system

The new aggregation structure for import and export statistics is a component of a new system of commodity classifications.

The new system has two elements, a standard classification structure and alternative aggregation structures or variants of the standard classification. At this time, only one variant has been developed to serve the needs of the merchandise import and export accounts, but the system is designed to accommodate as many as necessary.

The link below presents the first two levels of the standard classification structure.

At its most detailed level (five-digit class), there are 263 classes of goods. This level of the classification will be the basis for the commodity dimension of the input output tables with some minor differences to address data limitations. That said, this will be the most detailed level for which statistics on domestic production, imports and exports of goods will be harmonized.

The 263 detailed classes of the standard classification structure are then organized into 88 three-digit groups designed to publish selected statistics and used to define the higher level categories of variants.

Though not shown here, the standard classification embeds additional levels that integrate more detailed categories used in other parts of the statistical system. For instance, the five-digit classes of the standard classification have been defined in most cases on the basis of the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods, a classification that has been in use for several years. The ASM list of goods is consequently well integrated into the new system.

As well, Statistics Canada is developing new goods classes for the measurement of producer prices, largely based on the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods. The producer price classes will appear below the five-digit classes of the standard classification and above the ASM classes in the classification hierarchy, thereby enhancing the comparability of production and producer price statistics.

The relationship between the 263 five-digit classes of the standard classification and those of the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff (CT) is defined by concordances. Each of the most detailed categories of those classifications will be assigned to one of the five-digit classes of the standard classification. This approach allows for the presentation of import and export statistics on the basis of two distinct systems; on the basis of the Harmonized System and derived Canadian versions (the CEC and CT) as required by law; and on the basis of the new classification system presented here.

As mentioned earlier, only one high level alternative aggregation structure or variant has been developed so far. It will replace the summary import groups and summary export groups that have been in use for several decades. The link below leads to the new aggregation structure for import and export statistics.

Though there is only one high-level aggregation structure at this time, the system is designed to add variants to serve other analytical needs. All variants will share two common features:

  • The aggregates will be defined in terms of the 3-digit categories of the standard classification;
  • The standard classification elements used to define these aggregates will retain the standard classification code.

The reader will note the alphanumeric codes of the two top levels of the variant for merchandise import and export accounts (codes beginning with the letter C) and the numeric codes of the two lower levels of the structure (those of the standard classification elements used to define the aggregates). This coding approach will be retained if additional variants are developed. The variants will be recognizable by the alpha numeric coding at the first two levels of the structure.

The nomenclature

The aggregation structure presented above has four levels named section, division, group and class.

The aggregation structures have four levels: section, division, group and class.
Level Name Number of digits Number of categories
1 Section 3-digit alpha numeric 11
2 Division 4-digit alpha numeric 33
3 Group 3-digit numeric 88
4 Class 5-digit numeric 263

The details below the class level (not shown here) will be known as NAPCS subclass and NAPCS detail when NAPCS Canada 2012 is introduced.

The advantages and limitations of the new system

The new system has the following advantages:

  • Promotes better integration of statistics on goods;
  • Promotes the publication of more coherent data on goods;
  • Facilitates data interpretation for users;
  • Facilitates the harmonization of the classification revision cycle for all programs that use the classification system.

The new system also has limits.

The most important is that its implementation depends on the integration of classifications that were developed independently from one another and do not always use the same criteria to distinguish products - the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods, the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff (CT). As a consequence, the concordances between the CEC and the standard classes and between the CT and the standard classes are less than perfect. This limitation cannot be entirely eliminated since the use of the CEC and CT is prescribed by administrative agreements and legal obligations.

However, the new system makes it possible to eliminate several inconsistencies between the basic classifications at the more aggregated levels.

Finally, it is important to note that the system presented here is not complete since it covers neither services, nor tangible or intangible assets. These components will be added in NAPCS Canada 2012.

Implementation schedule

The main users within Statistics Canada are planning to adopt the new classification system in 2012. The following table shows the plan for each program.

Revised on April 30, 2012

The following table shows the plans for each program.
Statistical program Variables First release and reference period
International merchandise trade Merchandise imports and exports (current dollars, constant dollars and related price indexes). October 18, 2012, Historical data released for January 1988 to August 2012 on a Balance of Payments and Customs based values

October 18, 2012, Historical data released for January 1997 to August 2012 on a Balance of Payments and Customs based Price and Volume Indexes

November 8, 2012, Regular data release for September 2012 reference month (Balance of Payments and Customs based current dollar, constant dollar and related price and volume indexes)

Balance of payments Merchandise imports and exports in current dollars. October 2012 for the data for the second quarter of 2012 and every previous quarter since the first quarter of 1981.
Income and expenditure account Annual and quarterly merchandise imports and exports (current dollars, constant dollars and related price indexes). October 2012 for the data for the second quarter of 2012 and every previous quarter since the first quarter of 1981.
Producer price indexes Producer price indexes. November 2013 based on the basket for 2010. The reference period remains to be determined.

The level of detail provided will differ depending on the program and variables. The following table provides the plans for each program with regard to the classification version used and the level of detail available.

The following table provides the plans for each program with regard to the classification version used and the level of detail available.
Statistical program Standard classification Variant: Merchandise import and export accounts
International merchandise trade At the group level (level 3 - 88 categories) in regular publications, and at the class level (level 4 - 263 categories) on request. At the section level (level 1 - 11 categories) and at the division level (level 2 - 33 categories) in regular publications.
Balance of payments   At the section level (level 1 - 11 categories) in regular publications.
Income and expenditure account   At the division level (level 2 - 33 categories) in regular publications.
Producer price indexes At the subclass level (level 5 -758 categories for the industry producer price index and raw material price index programs)  

North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) Canada 2012

The introduction of this system is a first step towards broader harmonization of commodity classifications and statistics. In the longer term, Statistics Canada intends to use a similar approach to integrate a variety of commodity classifications, in particular those used to collect value and price data on production, imports and exports of goods, services and intangible assets. This includes the classifications of agricultural, mining, manufacturing, trade and service commodities.

The full implementation of the system will begin with the release of the 2012 Canadian version of the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) Canada 2012, scheduled for summer of 2012. NAPCS Canada 2012 will:

  • Embed significant revisions to the classifications of manufactured, retailed and wholesaled goods as a result of a project to harmonize commodity classifications in North America.
  • Provide a means to organize and present commodity statistics on the basis of a coherent system of standard classes, standard variant aggregations and standard concordances.

The implementation schedule of NAPCS Canada 2012 will vary by program. The schedule will be published with the release of the classification.

Notice of introduction of a new aggregation structure for the classification of imports and exports of goods

August 8, 2011

This is an information notice.

Statistics Canada will introduce a new classification structure to organize and present import and export statistics in various programs. The new structure will replace the classification structures known as the summary import groups (SIG) and the summary export groups (SEG) that have been in use for several decades.

The new structure builds a bridge between the Canadian Export Classification (CEC), Customs Tariff (CT) and the Input-output commodity classification (IOCC). The main objectives of the new system are to better integrate import and export statistics in the System of National Accounts and update the presentation of import and export statistics.

The links below provide a description of the current practices regarding the classification of goods in the Canadian statistical system, of the new aggregation structure, of the advantages and limitations of the new system and, the implementation schedule.

The reader should note that the introduction of this aggregation structure is only a first step towards improved harmonization of commodity statistics. It launches a new approach that will be fully implemented in the 2012 Canadian version of the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS). The link below leads to more information on that project.

The current situation

Statistics on goods are based on several classification systems. In the domain of statistics on the supply and use of goods, some of the key classifications are the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods, the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff (CT). There is no standard system or aggregation structure integrating these classifications. The new system seeks to fill this gap.

In the Canadian statistical system, the input-output accounts integrate product statistics into a coherent system that describes the supply and use of goods, services and production factors in our economy. This framework underlies the new classification system.

The new classification system

The new aggregation structure for import and export statistics is a component of a new system of commodity classifications.

The new system has two elements, a standard classification structure and alternative aggregation structures or variants of the standard classification. At this time, only one variant has been developed to serve the needs of the merchandise import and export accounts, but the system is designed to accommodate as many as necessary.

The link below presents the first two levels of the standard classification structure.

At its most detailed level (five-digit class), there are 264 classes of goods. This level of the classification will be the basis for the commodity dimension of the input output tables with some minor differences to address data limitations. That said, this will be the most detailed level for which statistics on domestic production, imports and exports of goods will be harmonized.

The 264 detailed classes of the standard classification structure are then organized into 88 three-digit groups designed to publish selected statistics and used to define the higher level categories of variants.

Though not shown here, the standard classification embeds additional levels that integrate more detailed categories used in other parts of the statistical system. For instance, the five-digit classes of the standard classification have been defined in most cases on the basis of the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods, a classification that has been in use for several years. The ASM list of goods is consequently well integrated into the new system.

As well, Statistics Canada is developing new goods classes for the measurement of producer prices, largely based on the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods. The producer price classes will appear below the five-digit classes of the standard classification and above the ASM classes in the classification hierarchy, thereby enhancing the comparability of production and producer price statistics.

The relationship between the 264 five-digit classes of the standard classification and those of the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff (CT) is defined by concordances. Each of the most detailed categories of those classifications will be assigned to one of the five-digit classes of the standard classification. This approach allows for the presentation of import and exports statistics on the basis of two distinct systems; on the basis of Harmonized System and derived Canadian versions (the CEC and CT) as required by law; and on the basis the new classification system presented here.

As mentioned earlier, only one high level alternative aggregation structure or variant has been developed so far. It will replace the summary import groups and summary export groups that have been in use for several decades. The link below leads to the new aggregation structure for import and export statistics.

Though there is only one high-level aggregation structure at this time, the system is designed to add variants to serve other analytical needs. All variants will share two common features:

  • The aggregates will be defined in terms of the 3-digit categories of the standard classification;
  • The standard classification elements used to define these aggregates will retain the standard classification code.

The reader will note the alphanumeric codes of the two top levels of the variant for merchandise import and export accounts (codes beginning with the letter C) and the numeric codes of the two lower levels of the structure (those of the standard classification elements used to define the aggregates). This coding approach will be retained if additional variants are developed. The variants will be recognizable by the alpha numeric coding at the first two levels of the structure.

The nomenclature

The aggregation structure presented above has four levels named section, division, group and class.

The aggregation structures have four levels: section, division, group and class.
Level Name Number of digits Number of categories
1 Section 3-digit alpha numeric 11
2 Division 4-digit alpha numeric 33
3 Group 3-digit numeric 88
4 Class 5-digit numeric 264

The details below the class level (not shown here) will be known as NAPCS subclass and NAPCS detail when NAPCS Canada 2012 is introduced.

The advantages and limitations of the new system

The new system has the following advantages:

  • Promotes better integration of statistics on goods;
  • Promotes the publication of more coherent data on goods;
  • Facilitates data interpretation for users;
  • Facilitates the harmonization of the classification revision cycle for all programs that use the classification system.

The new system also has limits.

The most important is that its implementation depends on the integration of classifications that were developed independently from one another and do not always use the same criteria to distinguish products - the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) - List of Goods, the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff (CT). As a consequence, the concordances between the CEC and the standard classes and between the CT and the standard classes are less than perfect. This limitation cannot be entirely eliminated since the use of the CEC and CT is prescribed by administrative agreements and legal obligations.

However, the new system makes it possible to eliminate several inconsistencies between the basic classifications at the more aggregated levels.

Finally, it is important to note that the system presented here is not complete since it covers neither services, nor tangible or intangible assets. These components will be added in NAPCS Canada 2012.

Implementation schedule

The main users within Statistics Canada are planning to adopt the new classification system in 2012. The following table shows the plan for each program. The scope of the historical revision by each program remains to be determined.

The following table shows the plans for each program.
Statistical program Variables First release and reference period
International merchandise trade Merchandise imports and exports (current dollars, constant dollars and related price indexes). June 2012 for April 2012 data (based on the tariff standard and the Balance of Payments standard).
Balance of payments Merchandise imports and exports in current dollars. May 2012 for the data for the first quarter of 2012 and every previous quarter since the first quarter of 1981.
Income and expenditure account Annual and quarterly merchandise imports and exports (current dollars, constant dollars and related price indexes). May 2012 for data in the first quarter of 2012 and every previous quarter since the first quarter of 1981.
Producer price indexes Producer price indexes. November 2013 based on the basket for 2007. The reference period remains to be determined.

The level of detail provided will differ depending on the program and variables. The following table provides the plans for each program with regard to the classification version used and the level of detail available.

The following table provides the plans for each program with regard to the classification version used and the level of detail available.
Statistical program Standard classification Variant: Merchandise import and export accounts
International merchandise trade At the group level (level 3 - 88 categories) in regular publications, and at the class level (level 4 - 264 categories) on request. At the section level (level 1 - 11 categories) and at the division level (level 2 - 33 categories) in regular publications.
Balance of payments   At the section level (level 1 - 11 categories) in regular publications.
Income and expenditure account   At the division level (level 2 - 33 categories) in regular publications.
Producer price indexes At the group level (level 3 -88 categories) in regular publications and at the class level (level 4 - 264 categories) on request.  

North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) Canada 2012

The introduction of this system is a first step towards broader harmonization of commodity classifications and statistics. In the longer term, Statistics Canada intends to use a similar approach to integrate a variety of commodity classifications, in particular those used to collect value and price data on production, imports and exports of goods, services and intangible assets. This includes the classifications of agricultural, mining, manufacturing, trade and service commodities.

The full implementation of the system will begin with the release of the 2012 Canadian version of the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) Canada 2012, scheduled for summer of 2012. NAPCS Canada 2012 will:

  • Embed significant revisions to the classifications of manufactured, retailed and wholesaled goods as a result of a project to harmonize commodity classifications in North America.
  • Provide a means to organize and present commodity statistics on the basis of a coherent system of standard classes, standard variant aggregations and standard concordances.

The implementation schedule of NAPCS Canada 2012 will vary by program. The schedule will be published with the release of the classification.

North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) Canada 2012 Version 1.0

Introduction

Statistics Canada has initiated a major revision and re-organization of the commodity classification systems used for its economic, business and trade statistics. The main objective of the project was to improve the coherence of commodity-level data.

The first step in the revision process was the introduction of a new classification structure to present merchandise imports and exports in various statistical programs. The new structure, named NAPCS Canada 2007, was published in August 2011 and revised in May 2012. It replaced the classification structures known as the summary import groups (SIG) and the summary export groups (SEG) that have been in use for several decades. International merchandise trade statistics were first published on the basis of the new classification on October 18, 2012.

The 2011 notice informed readers that the introduction of the new classification structure was only a first step towards improved harmonization and integration of commodity classifications. The plan was to develop a classification of all goods and services, the 2012 Canadian version of the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS Canada 2012).

Background

Statistics on various aspects of the supply and use of goods and services are pervasive in the Canadian statistical system. These statistics inform on a variety of topics, including the outputs of industries, the consumption by businesses and households, the value of imports and exports, and the movement of industrial and consumer prices. As an illustration, about 80% of Statistics Canada's business and trade statistics programs measure an aspect of the supply or use of goods or services.

Previously these statistics were not always comparable. They were based on many commodity classification systems, and there was no standard classification system integrating them into a coherent whole. NAPCS Canada 2012 is intended to fill this gap.

In the domain of statistics on the supply and use of goods, the key standard classifications currently in use in business and trade statistics programs are the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) 2004 - List of Goods, the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff. In addition, there are several program-specific classifications such as the ones used for agricultural and mining production statistics, and those used to create industrial product and raw material price indexes.

In the domain of statistics on the supply and use of services, the key standard classification is NAPCS Canada [Provisional Version 0.1], a classification developed in collaboration with the United States and Mexico and first published in 2007. There are also program-specific classifications such as the ones used to measure the sale of commodities at retail and wholesale, and the one used to measure trade in services.

NAPCS Canada 2012 integrates many of these classifications into a single system that comprises both goods and services. The objective is to improve the coherence of commodity-level data across surveys and statistical programs within the Agency, but the use of a single system will also contribute to the efficiency of statistical processes.

Integration of commodity data in economic accounts

Commodity statistics are an important input to the Canadian System of National Accounts. In particular, the input-output accounts provide the framework to integrate commodity statistics from a variety of sources, and based on a variety of classifications, into a system that describes the supply and use of goods, services and production factors in our economy. The input-output commodity classification (IOCC) underlies that framework; several versions have been developed over time, the latest for the 2009 accounts and historical revision.

In order to achieve the objective of improving the coherence of commodity-level data, the 2009 IOCC has been incorporated into NAPCS Canada 2012 where feasible. There are a number of conceptual and practical constraints that prevent embedding the IOCC in its entirety. That said, establishing a strong relationship between classifications used for the collection of commodity data and the classification used to create input-output tables is a key feature of NAPCS Canada 2012, the feature that will contribute the most to improving coherence.

Standard classification structure

The standard classification structure comprises four levels named group, class, subclass and detail. The table below outlines the nomenclature and provides the number of categories within each level of the classification.

Nomenclature and number of categories within each level of the classification
Level Coding Number of categories
Group 3-digit code 158
Class 5-digit code 510
Subclass 6-digit code 1,398
Detail 7-digit code 2,648

NAPCS Canada 2012 uses a traditional hierarchical coding system, that is, the code of a child adds a digit (two digits in the case of classes) to the code of the parent.

The classification is designed to accommodate the needs of the many business and trade statistics programs that collect and publish commodity data. Its hierarchical structure allows different programs to choose a level of detail that suits their needs and constraints in a way that supports the coherence of data collected and published at different levels of detail. The paragraphs that follow describe the main purpose of each level of the classification.

At the lowest level (7-digit), the classification recognizes 2,648 categories of goods and services. This is the most detailed level for which business statistics programs will collect and publish data on the outputs of industries, unless there is an extension variant where the program will publish more detail.

The primary purpose of the subclass level (6-digit) is to support the industrial product price index (IPPI) and raw material price index (RMPI) programs. There are 1,398 categories at that level, of which 645 are an industrial product price index and 78 are a raw material price index. The remaining subclasses are goods and services that are not part of the universes of industrial product or raw material price indexes.

The class level (5-digit) is at the core of the system. This is the target level to produce coherent statistics on the production, imports, exports and consumption of goods and services. The class level comprises 510 categories of goods and services, most of which are the same in the 2009 input-output commodity classification (IOCC).

Finally, the group level (3-digit) provides 158 higher level aggregates for presentation and analytical purposes. This level will also be the basis to define alternative aggregation structures, known as regrouping variants. The next section discusses variants in NAPCS Canada 2012.

Classification variants

Classification variants play two roles. Regrouping variants allow for alternate aggregation structures when the standard aggregation structure does not meet the analytical needs of particular programs. Extension variants allow for additional categories when the most detailed level of the standard classification is still too aggregated to meet user needs.

The regrouping variants of NAPCS Canada 2012 typically add one or two levels above the standard classification structure, named section and division. The division level is typically defined in terms of standard groups (3-digit); this approach ensures a clear understanding of the relationship between the standard classification and the variants.

In theory, there could be as many regrouping variants as there are analytical interests, but in practice there will only be a few. At the time of publishing this note, the plan is to create regrouping variants for international merchandise trade statistics, industrial product price statistics and raw material price statistics.

In order to accommodate a system of regrouping variants, the coding is alphanumeric. Each variant has its own codes at the section and/or division levels. The table below uses the international merchandise trade variant to illustrate the nomenclature.

In order to accommodate a system of regrouping variants, the coding is alphanumeric. Each variant has its own codes at the section and/or division levels.
Level Coding Number of categories
Section Alpha + 2 digit 13
Division Alpha + 3 digit 34
Group 3-digit standard code 97 (of 158)
Class 5-digit standard code 290 (of 510)
Subclass 6-digit standard code 774 (of 1,398)
Detail 7-digit standard code 1,402 (of 2,648)

The regrouping variants of NAPCS Canada 2012 typically do not cover the entire universe of goods and services, and different variants will cover different universes. The number of groups comprised in each variant will therefore vary.

Extension variants of NAPCS Canada 2012 allow for additional product categories below the most detailed level of the standard classification (7-digit). The standard hierarchical coding system applies, that is, the code of the additional categories adds a digit to the parent code.

Concordances

Conceptual and practical constraints prevent the integration of all existing commodity classification into a single system. Notably, the Canadian Export Classification (CEC) and the Customs Tariff are not embedded into the structure of NAPCS Canada 2012.

These classifications were developed independently from NAPCS Canada 2012 and do not always use the same criteria to distinguish commodities. They are based on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) published by the World Customs Organization (WCO). The use of an HS-based system to collect and present import and export data is prescribed by administrative agreements and Canada is obliged to conform its statistical nomenclature with the Harmonized System.

Any effort to integrate commodity statistics must account for import and export statistics. In NAPCS Canada 2012, this is done by concordance. Each of the most detailed categories of the CEC and CT will be assigned to one of the five-digit classes of the standard classification. This approach allows for the presentation of import and export statistics on the basis of two distinct systems; on the basis of the Harmonized System and derived Canadian versions (the CEC and CT), and on the basis of the new classification system presented here.

The NAPCS and the HS are not always compatible. Though this is a limitation of the system, establishing the concordance at the class level of NAPCS makes it possible to eliminate most of the inconsistencies between the HS based systems and NAPCS.

Relationship between NAPCS Canada 2012 and existing commodity classifications

In addition to integrating several classifications into a single system, NAPCS Canada 2012 revises existing classifications at the detail level. The most significant revisions are to the classifications of manufactured goods, retailed goods, wholesaled goods and constructions. The classification of agricultural goods, and of consumer, business and institutional services remain largely unchanged. It is expected that the 2017 version of the classification will introduce more significant changes to services.

NAPCS Canada 2012 also represents a significant departure from the current system used to organize industrial product and raw material prices, the Principal Commodity Group Aggregates (PCGAs). The PCGAs are based on the Standard Classification of Goods (SCG), an older standard last updated for reference year 2001.

Relationship between NAPCS Canada 2012 and the trilateral classification

The chosen approach is to define the most detailed categories of the domestic classification so as to permit aggregation into the North American system. The North American aggregation structure will therefore be a regrouping variant.

That said, the trilateral NAPCS was developed in parallel and is not yet final. It was therefore necessary to make assumptions about the North American system when developing NAPCS Canada. As a consequence, it is possible that the domestic classes will not always respect the boundaries of the final trilateral classes. The situation will improve with the 2017 revision of the classification.

Implementation of NAPCSCanada 2012

Many programs will implement NAPCS Canada 2012 for reference year 2013, and a smaller number for reference years 2014 and 2015. The implementation in business and trade statistics programs will be gradual and largely completed in 2016 for 2015 reference year data. A more detailed transition plan will be published at a later date.

Additional information

For additional information on the North American Product Classification System, please contact Standards Division at standards-normes@statcan.gc.ca.

Differences between SCCAI 2011 and ISO 3166-1:2006

Differences between Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest 2011 and International Standards Organisation 3166-1:2006
SCCAI 2011 ISO 3166-1:2006
Bolivia Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Burma (Myanmar) Myanmar
Congo, Republic of the Congo
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Hong Kong
Iran Iran, Islamic Republic of
Ireland, Republic of Ireland
Korea, North Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Korea, South Korea, Republic of
KosovoFootnote 1  
Laos Lao People's Democratic Republic
Macao Special Administrative Region Macao
Macedonia, Republic of
 
Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of
Moldova Moldova, Republic of
Saint Helena
 
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
SarkFootnote 2  
South Africa, Republic of South Africa
Syria Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan Taiwan, Province of China
Tanzania Tanzania, United Republic of
Venezuela Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
Virgin Islands, United States Virgin Islands, U.S.
West Bank and Gaza Strip (Palestine) Palestinian Territory, Occupied

Footnotes

Footnote 1

Kosovo was recognized as a country by Canada in 2008, Kosovo is not included in the current version of ISO 3166-1 but it is included in the SCCAI since 2009.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Sark is an area of interest listed by the United Nations Statistics Division (Source: Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (accessed February 16, 2012).

Return to first footnote 2 referrer

Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2011

Introduction to the classification

The Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2011 was developed to increase coherence on the list of countries used within Statistics Canada and to be more consistent with government of Canada norms. This list of countries and areas includes those countries or areas for which statistical data are compiled. To satisfy the broadest possible range of applications, all entities in that list are mutually exclusive. For instance, the component parts of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macao Special Administrative Region and the remainder of China are considered as separate entities and each has its own codes. This list of countries and areas of interest forms the base level of the classification and applies to both economic and social statistics.

There are 251 countries or areas in the SCCAI 2011 including the 249 countries or areas found in the international standard ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1. The two addition entries in the SCCAI that are not in the ISO list are Kosovo, which was recognized as a country by Canada in 2008, and Sark which has been recognized as an area by the United Nations in 2011. The names of countries or areas refer to their short form used and not necessarily to their official name. They are based on the official short names used in the ISO standard and were modified both to reflect Canadian norms as well as to follow specific naming rules adopted for the Canadian list. The modifications to reflect Canadian norms were done based on consultation with the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade as well as examining responses to the 2006 Census of Population question for the place of birth variable. The specific naming rules adopted for the Canadian list are:

  1. Use of short form of country names wherever practicable and/or to avoid confusion;
  2. Use of commas for sorting in alphabetical order; and
  3. Use of long form of country names to avoid confusion.

These changes to the names have resulted in differences between SCCAI 2011 and ISO 3166-1:2006.

The SCCAI provides a list of the names of countries or areas of interest in alphabetical order, with their corresponding five-digit SCCAI code. The first two digits in the SCCAI code correspond to the hierarchical structure in the Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2011 and the last three digits represent the United Nations numeric codes (NUM-3) for countries or areas. Also included are internationally used three-digit numerical codes, two-character alpha codes and three-character alpha codes.

In addition, historical revisions of countries and areas of interest are available to users who compile longitudinal data on countries and areas of interest.

The material on current and historical countries and areas of interest is presented here to help users who compile longitudinal data on countries and areas of interest to assign those data to the right current or formerly used country names and codes. A start and end date are provided to define the period of validity of country names and codes; however there is no end date when the country names or codes are still current. This list which compiles changes to country names and codes since 1970 is based on information gathered from the following sources:

  • current and previous editions of the standard ISO 3166-1, Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1: Country codes;
  • ISO 3166-3 Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 3: Code for formerly used names of countries;
  • Newsletters related to ISO 3166-1 and ISO 3166-3; and
  • current and previous editions of the United Nations Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use.

Relation to previous standard

This is a revision of the previous Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2010. The current standard, like the previous standard, is also based on the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1, and has been modified for consistency with Canadian norms. This standard includes a classification variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2011 that provides standard groupings of countries and associated codes for publication purposes. Usage notes are included with the standard.

Conformity to relevant internationally recognized standards

This standard is compatible with the list of countries or areas included in the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1 except for the recognition of Kosovo and Sark. The coding structure follows the ISO coding structure with countries having three-digit numeric codes, two-character alpha codes, and three-character alpha codes. New codes were assigned to Kosovo and Sark based on an ISO clause which places codes at the disposal of users who need to add further names of countries or areas of interest to their list.

The 249 countries and areas in the ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1 standard includes 240 of the 241 countries or areas for which statistical data are compiled by the Statistics Division of the United Nations SecretariatFootnote 2. The entity Channel Islands which regroups Guernsey, Jersey and Sark is an intermediate level not retained in ISO or SCCAI.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3166 code lists (accessed February 16, 2012). The country list accessed contains updates from Newsletters of ISO 3166-1:2006, including updates from Newsletter ISO 3166-1:2006 VI-11 published on November 8, 2011.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

United Nations Statistics Division, Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (accessed February 16, 2012).

Return to first footnote 2 referrer

Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2011

Status

This standard was approved as a departmental standard on February 20, 2012.

2011 version of SCCAI

The Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2011 is based on the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1 including changes announced in newsletters which update the currently valid ISO standard. All changes made as of December 31st, 2011 are included in this 2011 version of the SCCAI. The list was also updated for consistency with government of Canada norms.

In addition to the list of countries and areas of interest, a classification variant for social statistics data is included. The hierarchical structure of the classification shows the relationship between these geographic areas.

HTML format

Concordances and documentation on changes

Variants of SCCAI

Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics - SCCAI 2011

The classification variant for social statistics includes customized groupings (geographical macro-regions and geographical sub-regions) of the SCCAI countries for the publication of social statistics data.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3166 code lists (accessed February 16, 2012).

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2010

Introduction to the classification

The Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2010 was developed to increase coherence on the list of countries used within Statistics Canada and to be more consistent with government of Canada norms. This list of countries and areas includes those countries or areas for which statistical data are compiled. To satisfy the broadest possible range of applications, all entities in that list are mutually exclusive. For instance, the component parts of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macao Special Administrative Region and the remainder of China are considered as separate entities and each has its own codes. This list of countries and areas of interest forms the base level of the classification and applies to both economic and social statistics.

There are 249 countries or areas in the SCCAI 2010 including the 248 countries or areas found in the international standard ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1, Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions, plus Kosovo, which was recognized as a country by Canada in 2008. The names of countries or areas refer to their short form used and not necessarily to their official name. They are based on the official short names used in the ISO standard and were modified both to reflect Canadian norms as well as to follow specific naming rules adopted for the Canadian list. The modifications to reflect Canadian norms were done based on consultation with the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade as well as examining responses to the 2006 Census of Population question for the place of birth variable. The specific naming rules adopted for the Canadian list are:

  1. Use of short form of country names wherever practicable and/or to avoid confusion;
  2. Use of commas for sorting in alphabetical order; and
  3. Use of long form of country names to avoid confusion.

These changes to the names have resulted in differences between SCCAI 2010 and ISO 3166-1:2006.

Historical revisions of countries and areas of interest

The material on current and historical countries and areas of interest is presented here to help users who compile longitudinal data on countries and areas of interest to assign those data to the right current or formerly used country names and codes. A start and end date are provided to define the period of validity of country names and codes; however there is no end date when the country names or codes are still current. This list which compiles changes to country names and codes since 1970 is based on information gathered from the following sources:

  • current and previous editions of the standard ISO 3166-1, Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1: Country codes;
  • ISO 3166-3 Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 3: Code for formerly used names of countries;
  • Newsletters related to ISO 3166-1 and ISO 3166-3; and
  • current and previous editions of the United Nations Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use.

Relation to previous standard

This is a revision of the previous Standard Classification of Countries and Areas of Interest (SCCAI) 2009. The current standard, like the previous standard, is also based on the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1, and has been modified for consistency with Canadian norms. This standard includes a classification variant Countries and Areas of Interest for Social Statistics – SCCAI 2010 that provides standard groupings of countries and associated codes for publication purposes. Usage notes are included with the standard.

Conformity to relevant internationally recognized standards

This standard is compatible with the list of countries or areas included in the International Standard for country codes ISO 3166-1 except for the recognition of Kosovo. The coding structure follows the ISO coding structure with countries having three-digit numeric codes, two-character alpha codes, and three-character alpha codes. New codes were assigned to Kosovo based on an ISO clause which places codes at the disposal of users who need to add further names of countries or areas of interest to their list.

The 248 countries and areas in the ISO 3166-1:2006Footnote 1 standard includes 238 of the 239 countries or areas for which statistical data are compiled by the Statistics Division of the United Nations SecretariatFootnote 2. The entity Channel Islands which regroups Guernsey and Jersey is an intermediate level not retained in ISO or SCCAI.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3166 code lists (accessed December 23, 2010). The country list accessed contains updates from Newsletters of ISO 3166-1:2006, including updates from Newsletter ISO 3166-1:2006 VI-8 published on December 15, 2010.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

United Nations Statistics Division, Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (accessed December 23, 2010).

Return to first footnote 2 referrer