Evaluation of Statistics Canada's COVID-19 Data Response

Evaluation of Statistics Canada's COVID-19 Data Response:

Gross Domestic Product Flash Estimates, Consumer Prices Data and Other New Economic Statistical Products

Evaluation Report

June 2021

How the report is structured

The report in short

Throughout the pandemic, Statistics Canada has responded rapidly and with agility to the data needs of various users by developing many new products relevant to COVID-19 and its impacts on Canadians. While this response was agency-wide, this report focuses on three types of products: 1) gross domestic product (GDP) flash estimates, 2) consumer prices data and 3) other new economic statistical products.

This evaluation was conducted by Statistics Canada in accordance with the Treasury Board Policy on Results and Statistics Canada's Risk-based Audit and Evaluation Plan (2020/2021 to 2024/2025). The objective of the evaluation was to provide a neutral, evidence-based assessment of Statistics Canada's data response to COVID-19. The evaluation aimed at providing valuable information about the timeliness, the relevance and the impact of these products. It also looked at some of the related challenges and opportunities faced by the divisions responsible for these products to inform future direction.

The evaluation methodology consisted of a document review, administrative reviews and key interviews with Statistics Canada professionals working in different divisions within Economic Statistics. Additionally, interviews were conducted with key users and partners external to Statistics Canada. The findings outlined in this report are based on the triangulation of these data collection methods.

Key findings and recommendations

Design and delivery

The evaluation reviewed organizational changes that were implemented to develop COVID-19 economic statistical products. The evaluation found that Statistics Canada took rapid action by assessing and delivering products that shed light on issues of importance during the pandemic. Delivery of COVID-19 economic statistical products was facilitated by an organizational shift towards business agility, which included innovative approaches to manage resources and analyze data. The dedication of staff was instrumental in the successful release of those products. However, the sheer volume and push for expediency impacted staff well-being.

Responsiveness to users' needs

To inform Statistics Canada on the effectiveness of its response related to economic statistical data needs during COVID-19, the evaluation assessed the extent to which the products released addressed the needs of key users in different areas. The majority of users considered the products released to be relevant, useful, timely and accessible. Users were also satisfied with the agency's level of engagement and the methodological information released. As the pandemic has various socioeconomic impacts on Canadians, a number of gaps were identified in the areas of household economic data, employment data, and industry economic data.

Moving forward

The evaluation assessed the extent to which there is an ongoing need for COVID-19 economic statistical products and factors that must be taken into account going forward to deliver both COVID-19 products and regular activities. Users indicated an ongoing need for most of the products released, particularly for GDP flash estimates, consumer prices data and trade by exporter characteristics data. As the pandemic evolves, data on the recovery of the Canadian economy will be key for decision-making and policy development. The forward approach should focus on addressing post-pandemic data needs and areas of data gaps, while ensuring the sustainability of meeting both emerging and core economic data needs. Opportunities remain to fully explore the lessons learned from the pandemic.

Recommendation 1:

The Assistant Chief Statistician (ACS), Economic Statistics (Field 5), should ensure that a comprehensive strategy is developed to identify, prioritize and respond to emerging data needs (i.e., post-pandemic data), including areas of current data gaps.

The strategy should consider the key enablers identified, and include approaches and plans that clearly set out how:

  • emerging data needs will be identified (e.g., stakeholder engagement approaches, international scan);
  • current and emerging data gaps will be addressed;
  • data needs will be prioritized based on intended outcomes and resource capacity; and
  • ongoing monitoring of data needs will be carried out.

Recommendation 2:

The ACS, Economic Statistics (Field 5), should ensure that a lessons learned exercise from the COVID-19 pandemic is conducted to identify approaches that could be applied to respond to COVID-19 data needs and improve core activities going forward. The lessons learned should be presented to a Tier 1 committee that will provide direction on their potential implementation across the agency, as applicable. They should also be shared across the agency to foster innovation and continuous improvement in support of the agency-wide response to COVID-19.

Acronyms and abbreviations

ACS
Assistant Chief Statistician
CPI
Consumer Price Index
GDP
Gross domestic product
HR
Human resources
IIP
International investment position
NSO
National statistical office
OECD
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PEAI
Provincial economic activity index
SEPH
Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours
TEC
Trade by exporter characteristics

What is covered

The evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Treasury Board Policy on Results and Statistics Canada's Integrated Risk-based Audit and Evaluation Plan (2020/2021 to 2024/2025). In support of decision making, accountability and improvement, the objective of the evaluation was to provide a neutral, evidence-based assessment of Statistics Canada's data response to COVID-19.

Throughout the pandemic, Statistics Canada has responded rapidly and with agility to the data needs of various users by developing many new products relevant to COVID-19 and its impacts on Canadians. The evaluation focused on three types of products: 1) gross domestic product (GDP) flash estimates, 2) consumer prices data and 3) other new economic statistical products. The evaluation aims to provide valuable information about the timeliness, the relevance and the impact of these products. It also looked at some of the related challenges and opportunities faced by the divisions responsible for these products to inform future decisions.

Gross domestic product flash estimates

The GDP is a core economic measure of the health of the Canadian economy. Given the unique situation faced by the Canadian economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the demand for trusted information on the aggregate economic impact of this crisis, Statistics Canada has produced a flash estimate alongside the monthly official GDP release. The GDP flash estimate is an approximation of the scale of economic disruption resulting from the deliberate actions taken to protect the health of Canadians.

Consumer prices data

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) represents changes in prices as experienced by Canadian consumers. It measures price change by comparing, through time, the cost of a fixed basket of goods and services. While Statistics Canada continued to calculate the official CPI based on the fixed basket approach, it recognized that an analytical CPI series that accounts for temporary extreme shifts in consumer purchasing patterns would provide valuable insight into the impact of COVID-19 on the CPI. The derived products included adjusted price index, provincial average price tables and consumer spending patterns.

Other new economic statistical products

A number of other new economic statistical products were also developed to address specific COVID-19 data needs in the context of the Canadian economy:

  • provincial economic activity index (PEAI)
  • international investment position (IIP) (preliminary estimates)
  • monthly trade by exporter characteristics (TEC)
  • monthly transaction counts
  • monthly trade of personal protective goods.

The list of specific products can be found in Appendix A.

The evaluation

The scope of the evaluation encompassed three types of products: 1) GDP flash estimates, 2) consumer prices data and 3) other new economic statistical products. The scope was established in consultation with the divisions involved in these areas.

The evaluation was conducted from November 2020 to April 2021 and covered products released from March 2020 to February 2021.

The following issues and questions were identified for review.

Table 1 Evaluation issues & Evaluation questions
Evaluation issues Evaluation questions
Design and delivery What actions were taken by Statistics Canada in response to COVID-19 in regard to GDP flash estimates, consumer prices and other new economic statistical products?
Responsiveness to users' needs To what extent did the products released address the needs of key users?
  • Engagement
  • Relevance and Utility
  • Timeliness
  • Access
  • Clarity (of methodology)
Moving forward What factors should be taken into consideration moving forward?

Guided by a utilization-focused evaluation approach, the following quantitative and qualitative collection methods were used.

Figure 1 - Evaluation approach
Figure 1 depicts the evaluation approach which uses quantitative and qualitative collection methods.
Description - Figure 1

The figure depicts the four collection methods used for the evaluation: international scan, document review, key external interviews, and key internal interviews.

The international scan identified new products released and methods in other countries in response to COVID-19 (e.g., France, United States, Australia and the United Kingdom).

The document review included a review of Statistics

Canada's internal files and documents

The key external interviews included semi-structured interviews with: federal government departments, provincial and territorial governments, banks, academic and private sector. There were 25 external interviews conducted.

The key internal interviews included semi-structured interviews with Statistics Canada employees. There were 18 internal interviews conducted.

Three main limitations were identified, and mitigation strategies were employed.

Table 2 Limitations and mitigation strategies
Limitation Mitigation strategy
Because of the large number of users and partners using data, the perspectives gathered through external interviews may not be fully representative. External interviewees were selected using specific criteria to maximize a strategic reach for the interviews. Different types of organizations that use COVID-19-related data extensively from a wide range of locations across Canada were selected. Evaluators were able to find consistent overall patterns.
Interviews have the possibility of self-reported bias, which occurs when individuals who are reporting on their own activities portray themselves in a more positive light. By seeking information from a maximized circle of stakeholders, evaluators were able to find consistent overall patterns.
Limited documentation was available on the projects sampled for the evaluation. Key staff working on the relevant projects were interviewed and a strategy to gather additional documents during the interview sessions was put in place. Additional interviews were conducted as needed to fill the gaps.

What we learned

1. Design and delivery

Evaluation question

What actions were taken by Statistics Canada in response to COVID-19 in regard to GDP flash estimates, consumer prices data and other new economic statistical products?

Summary

The evaluation reviewed organizational changes that were implemented to develop COVID-19 economic statistical products. The evaluation found that Statistics Canada took rapid action by assessing and delivering products that shed light on issues of importance during the pandemic. Delivery of COVID-19 economic statistical products was facilitated by an organizational shift towards business agility, which included innovative approaches to manage resources and analyze data. The dedication of staff was instrumental in the successful release of those products. However, the sheer volume and push for expediency impacted staff well-being.

In response to COVID-19, Statistics Canada took rapid action to assess the impacts of the pandemic on the Canadian economy by delivering a variety of statistical products using innovative data approaches

The COVID-19 pandemic had, and still continues to have, significant impacts on the Canadian economy and society. During this crisis, the need for more timely and credible data has never been as crucial to understand and manage the economic and social effects of the pandemic. In response to COVID-19 economic data needs, Statistics Canada developed new products and adapted some of their regular products. These products aimed at providing more timely and relevant data for monitoring the impacts of the pandemic on the Canadian economy. Economic statistical products were primarily developed by the Macroeconomic Accounts Branch (Industry Accounts Division, National Economic Accounts Division and International Accounts Division) and the Economy-wide Statistics Branch (Consumer Prices Division) under the Economic Statistics Field. The Provincial Economic Activity Index was developed by the Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch (Economic Analysis Division) under the Strategic Management, Methods and Analysis Field, in collaboration with the National Economic Accounts Division.

Gross domestic product flash estimates (Industry Accounts Division)

Statistics Canada provides an advanced aggregate indicator (GDP flash estimate) of the state of the Canadian economy in addition to the monthly official GDP release. This advanced aggregate indicator is subject to future revisions as more information on economic activities becomes available over the period.

The methodology for the GDP flash estimate is based on preliminary and often incomplete information as well as other sources such as publicly released facts, including media releases and general public statements by businesses and governments. It was noted that the GDP flash estimate must be interpreted with caution, as the methodology to obtain it is different and the quality of the data is lower than that of the official estimates.

Consumer prices data (Consumer Prices Division)

Beginning in April 2020, the collection and compilation of CPI have been impacted by measures designed to limit the spread of COVID-19, as in-person field collection was conducted remotely, and imputation strategies were required to address an increased number of temporary business closures and out-of-stock products. These measures and strategies were aligned to international guidelines and followed consultation with other national statistical offices (NSOs) from Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.

While Statistics Canada continued to calculate the official CPI based on the fixed basket approach, exploratory work recognized that an analytical CPI series that accounts for temporary extreme shifts in consumer purchasing patterns would provide additional insight into the impact of COVID-19. Using various sources of expenditure data, Statistics Canada, in partnership with the Bank of Canada, calculated adjusted consumer expenditure basket weights and an adjusted price index reflecting shifts in consumption patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. New data tables reflecting consumption patterns during the pandemic were released. It was noted that the adjusted price index is experimental and should not be used instead of the official measure of consumer price inflation, the CPI.

Provincial economic activity index (Economic Analysis Division, Strategic Management, Methods and Analysis Field)

The experimental indexes of economic activity in the provinces and territories provide a timely summary measure of economic activity by combining existing economic data into a single index. Statistics Canada adopted a statistical model-based strategy to quickly create exploratory measures of provincial economic activity. The models look for correlations in data and typically have a different set of inputs for each province or territory, impacting the consistency and thus affecting inter-jurisdictional comparability.

International investment position (International Accounts Division)

The international investment position (IIP) is the value and composition of Canada's assets and liabilities to the rest of the world. The preliminary estimates (IIP flash estimates) for this measure were released once in April 2020 from the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistics Canada developed this flash estimate based on a methodology that focuses primarily on valuation effects. The estimate was not expected to be of the same quality as Statistics Canada's official estimates, as the model used was based on the valuation effect of 2019 and an incomplete set of surveys and administrative data sources. The resulting revisions were small; however, there were minimal fluctuations in the economy during the period covered.

Monthly trade by exporter characteristics (International Accounts Division)

The trade by exporter characteristics – Goods (TEC-Goods) program provides aggregated statistical information on the characteristics of Canadian businesses that export goods. The new data were developed based on a similar linkage methodology used for the annual TEC-Goods program. The data were seasonally adjusted, starting at the release of August 2020, to remove the effect of seasonal and calendar influences from the original data.

Monthly import transaction counts (International Accounts Division)

Statistics Canada began publishing monthly counts of import transactions in response to COVID 19 in May 2020. The counts are not seasonally adjusted and can vary from month to month based on seasonal patterns and trading day effects. In addition, they are not completely aligned with the trade values produced for the month based on the Canada Border Services Agency final accounting deadlines, as many of the transactions processed in a given month actually occurred in the previous month.

Monthly trade of personal protective goods (International Accounts Division)

Statistics Canada produced information to examine the trade in products used for the prevention, testing and treatment of COVID-19 by creating four categories: disinfectants and sterilization products, personal protective equipment, medical equipment and products, and diagnostic products. The categorization of goods was developed based on the Harmonized System classification guidelines.

Common approaches were used across OECD countries to develop products addressing COVID-19 economic statistical data needs

The United States releases advance estimates roughly 30 days after the quarter, which are similar to the early release of GDP. France has been publishing flash estimates of economic activity, including GDP, every two weeks since the end of March 2020 and has committed to do so until the end of 2021. The United Kingdom now provides early monthly estimates of GDP, in addition to their usual quarterly estimate. In terms of consumer prices data, Statistics Canada appeared to be the first NSO to develop an adjusted price index to account for the sudden shift in consumer expenditures. Similar to Statistics Canada, other countries did release information on the impacts of the pandemic. For example, Australia developed consumer demand statistical information during the pandemic using scanner data.

The PEAI is somewhat unique to Canada. Although it uses standard statistical approaches, similar to other OECD countries, its methodology is tailored to account for the various economic nuances in each province and territory. The model used was an adaptation of a United States model; however, the American activity index reports at the national level rather than the state level. New Zealand produces an index that is similar to that of the United States. The monthly TEC release is unique to Canada. Staff noted that other OECD countries showed interested in the product, particularly with regard to the disaggregation by city, country of destination, industry and other factors on a monthly basis.

Overall, the evaluation found that Statistics Canada modified its product mix more extensively than comparable NSOs to respond to COVID-19 data needs.

Delivery of COVID-19 economic statistical products was facilitated by an organizational shift towards business agility and through the agency's modernization initiatives

To ensure the timely delivery of COVID-19 products, changes were made to organizational approaches and internal processes to increase agility. The organizational shifts were also implemented to avoid interference with the delivery of mission-critical surveys, such as the regular GDP and CPI. Three main approaches were taken to that end: 1) by using different teams to develop, produce and release the COVID-19 products; 2) by developing the COVID-19 products outside the core infrastructure used for mission-critical surveys; and 3) by combining both approaches. For example, the GDP flash estimate was developed by a research and development team using their own methods and infrastructure (e.g., simpler techniques). Similarly, consumer prices data were primarily developed outside the CPI production team; however, many areas and staff were involved in the evaluation, analysis and quality assurance of the data. The work put additional pressures on all staff, which was also the case for the development of other products that could not solely rely on dedicated teams (e.g., TEC, PEAI). Other significant changes to existing processes (e.g., data production, data sources, methodology and dissemination) were also implemented to deliver other COVID-19 products (e.g., PEAI). Finally, collaboration between divisions was also enhanced and identified as a key enabler.

The evaluation did not find any major changes to governance mechanisms at the branch or division levels; regular structures were used to review and approve the COVID-19 products. However, the review and approval processes were expedited to maximize timeliness. It should also be noted that many products were already under development prior to the pandemic as part of the modernization agenda, and they were simply accelerated. For example, the Macroeconomic Accounts Branch already had discussions about the GDP flash estimate as part of the modernization agenda a few years prior to the pandemic. The pandemic accelerated its production and dissemination. The CPI scanner data, the Personal Inflation Calculator and high-capacity processing and machine learning capabilities were in use or development in the division prior to the pandemic. Some of the new products benefitted from this foundational work, which accelerated their release. Alternative data sources played a key role in the ability to shed light on shifting consumption patterns during the pandemic. This required collaboration across various divisions and fields, as well as with key stakeholders, such as the Bank of Canada. Big data methods and the use of open-source tools such as R and Python were repurposed to help develop the PEAI, and automation processes were already in place, which allowed the TEC development team to condense the time between the reference period and release date.

The collaboration and dedication of the teams were instrumental in the successful release of these products; staff well-being was impacted at times, but ongoing support was provided by management to help alleviate these impacts and support staff well-being

At the onset of the pandemic in March 2020, Statistics Canada primarily focused on maintaining its 21 mission-critical programs (e.g., GDP, CPI) to avoid any interruption of core economic measures for the proper functioning of the Canadian economy. Shortly after, other projects were rapidly launched by the agency to provide Canadians with data to better understand and manage various social and economic impacts of COVID-19.

Given the added workload and time pressure, the collaboration and dedication of teams involved in COVID-19 economic statistical products were instrumental to the timely delivery of these products. Flexible reallocation of resources also allowed for a rapid response to COVID-19 data needs, and release schedules for COVID-19 products were carefully planned with regard to core products to avoid increased pressure on teams and supporting divisions. Moreover, divisions within the Macroeconomic Accounts Branch, the Economy-wide Statistics Branch, and the Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch provided ongoing support to employees by adjusting workflows where possible to help facilitate work-life balance, holding well-being sessions and undertaking staff recognition activities. Nonetheless, the sheer volume and push for expediency had an impact on the well-being of staff.

2. Responsiveness to Users' Needs

Evaluation question

To what extent did the products released address the needs of key users?

  • Relevance and Utility
  • Timeliness
  • Access
  • Clarity (methodology)
  • Engagement

Summary

To inform Statistics Canada on the effectiveness of its response related to economic statistical data needs during COVID-19, the evaluation assessed the extent to which the products released addressed the needs of key users in different areas. The majority of users considered the products released to be relevant, useful, timely and accessible. Users were also satisfied with the agency's level of engagement and the methodological information released. Because the pandemic has various socioeconomic impacts on Canadians, a number of gaps were identified in the areas of household economic data, employment data and industry economic data.

To gauge COVID-19-related data needs, Statistics Canada leveraged new and established mechanisms to engage with key users and partners; stakeholder groups were satisfied with the agency's level of engagement

The established networks between key users and the divisions responsible for regular macroeconomic and consumer price data served as the base for understanding the needs of users and how they evolved during the pandemic. Proactive environmental scans (e.g., media, requests by general users and journalists, liaison with the minister's office) provided a real-time understanding of evolving data needs. Direct consultations with various federal and provincial and territorial organizations were also used to gather needs. For example, the GDP flash estimates and consumer prices data were developed in close collaboration with the Bank of Canada. The PEAI was developed in consultation with provincial and territorial focal points. Global Affairs Canada and Export Development Canada were engaged before producing the monthly TEC data, and the monthly trade of personal protective goods data was developed in collaboration with Health Canada and other federal partners. Throughout the pandemic, continued discussions were held to gather feedback from key users and partners to further refine products and associated methodologies.

Users were satisfied with the level of engagement from Statistics Canada; many of them had an opportunity to share their COVID-19 data needs with the organization.

Economic statistical products were used for multiple purposes, with GDP flash estimates, consumer prices data and monthly TEC being the products most used

The evaluation found that the most frequently used economic products were the GDP flash estimates, consumer prices data and monthly TEC. As shown in Chart 1, these new products were used for multiple purposes depending on the type of user.

Chart 1: Purpose and use of new economical products by user groups
Federal government
  • Monitor changes in the economy, analyze policy and facilitate decision-making at the deputy and ministerial level
  • Determine economic impacts on different industries and supply chains
  • Inform policy decisions
Provincial and territorial governments
  • Compare economic impacts of the pandemic in their province relative to the rest of Canada
  • Inform policy decisions
Academics and private consultants
  • Develop economic forecasts
Banks and financial institutions
  • Project credit losses based on economic forecasts
  • Determine credit provisioning calculations

Although the other economic products covered by the evaluation were seen as relevant by key users, there were mixed views on their utility. For example, while the PEAI was deemed useful to financial institutions and federal departments, the lack of clarity on the methodology negatively impacted its use among provincial departments, academics and private consultants. The monthly trade of personal protective goods was particularly useful only at the onset of the pandemic. The international investment position and monthly transaction counts were found to be generally useful. However, the lack of disaggregated data at the provincial level decreased its relevance. Overall, the products were deemed helpful in assisting users in keeping their partners and the public informed of the impacts of the pandemic.

The products were largely considered unique by users and were their preferred source of data; some gaps were noted in the areas of household, employment and industry economic data

The products were largely considered unique and the level of duplication of information produced by other organizations was deemed low. Users across stakeholder groups indicated that they could not have accessed similar information from other sources, with a few exceptions: indexes similar to the PEAI are calculated by private-sector economists and some analysis of consumer price inflation is published by the Bank of Canada (i.e., Monetary Policy Report). However, even in cases where users could access data from other sources, users preferred Statistics Canada's data, because it is trusted, detailed and transparent, relative to other sources.

While users were generally satisfied with the products released by the organization, gaps were identified by users in the areas of household economic data, employment data and industry economic data.

Chart 2: Data gaps identified by key users regarding COVID-19 economic data
Household economic data
  • Disaggregated data on the uptake of assistance programs (by demographics, sector/industry)
  • Changes in the distribution of debt, savings and household disposable income
  • Data on food prices and consumption for different household sizes
  • More monthly indicators on household consumption spending
  • Changes in the amount of sick leave and drug coverage, disaggregated by demographics
Employment data
  • Increased timeliness of employment data at the industry level
  • Increased timeliness of the Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours (SEPH) — lag is too long between release and reference period during the pandemic
  • Diversity group data (e.g., government programs targeting Black Canadian businesses, women, First Nations, Asians)
  • Behavioural changes that will impact employment in specific industries
  • Incorporation of Canada Revenue Agency data with the SEPH and demographic data to facilitate regional-level analysis (by postal code)
Industry economic data
  • Tourism and travel (domestic and international)
  • Monthly provincial GDP
  • Issues faced by small- and medium-sized enterprises and Canadian exporters, including a running tally of exported goods
  • Impact on services sectors, particularly the food services
  • Northern and rural consumer price data

The methodologies used by Statistics Canada were communicated to and understood by key users

Given that the majority of the products were developed in collaboration with key users and stakeholders, the methodologies were generally well understood. Methodological information was released through The Daily with the releases of the products. Key users indicated that Statistics Canada effectively communicated methodological information related to the products and was transparent about their limitations; the releases in The Daily were deemed to be useful in deepening their understanding about how to use the data.

Although users were generally satisfied, some users indicated that more methodological information would have been useful for the PEAI and consumer prices data. For example, users indicated that there was a lack of clarity around the methods and variables used to calculate the PEAI (e.g., the provincial indicators used). Additional information on how to interpret the data would also have been helpful. Finally, users also indicated that the methods and data sources used to calculate the adjusted price index were not clear.

The evaluation found that Statistics Canada is aware of these issues and has taken action. For example, outreach activities took place with key users to clarify methods and variables used for the PEAI. For consumer prices data, technical briefings were conducted to clarify methods and data sources.

Users were aware of releases and were satisfied overall with both the timeliness and the accessibility of the economic statistical products

The evaluation found that most key users, particularly federal, provincial and territorial users, relied on Statistics Canada staff to keep them informed of new releases, and engagement was continuous. Users were also kept informed of releases by accessing the Statistics Canada website, particularly through The Daily. To a lesser extent, social media was the mechanism through which they remain informed of releases. Two key channels to access data were direct contact with Statistics Canada and the website.

Although users were satisfied with the accessibility of those products, they made the following suggestions, which also apply to regular products:

  • provide more detailed themes on the website or the portals for existing data (e.g., vulnerable groups)
  • send data automatically to users who are subscribed to a mailing list
  • highlight key points for each release in a brief summary so users can quickly determine if the data are relevant for them
  • identify the most important issues on each Daily release.

In terms of timeliness of the products, users indicated that timely, quality data are always desirable. On the other hand, they were cognizant of the level of effort required by Statistics Canada to provide accurate detailed data that sheds light on issues of importance. In fact, a majority of users indicated that, at the onset of the pandemic, they had concerns about the capacity of Statistics Canada to meet set timelines for the release of core economic measures such as the GDP and the CPI, given the context at the time. As Statistics Canada maintained the planned releases of those regular core economic measures and later released additional COVID-19 economic statistical products, users no longer have those concerns. Key users were very satisfied with the timeliness of the COVID-19 economic products and recognized the trade-off between speed and accuracy of the information.

3. Moving Forward

Evaluation question

What factors should be taken into consideration moving forward?

Summary

The evaluation assessed the extent to which there is an ongoing need for COVID-19 economic statistical products and factors that must be taken into account going forward to deliver both COVID-19 products and regular activities. Users indicated an ongoing need for most of the products released, particularly for GDP flash estimates, consumer prices data and TEC data. As the pandemic evolves, data on the recovery of the Canadian economy will be key for decision making and policy development. Forward approaches should be focused on addressing post-pandemic data needs and areas of data gaps, while ensuring the sustainability of meeting both emerging and core economic data needs. Opportunities remain to fully explore the lessons learned from the pandemic.

While users foresee a continued need for COVID-19 economic statistical products, their focus has started to shift towards data needs to monitor economic recovery; meanwhile, efforts have been made by the agency to further improve these products

Keys users indicated that there is an ongoing need for economic statistical products going forward as the pandemic and its impacts continue. Among the products already released, they indicated an ongoing need particularly for GDP flash estimates, consumer prices data and TEC data. More generally, data tracking Canadian economic activity will be important. As the pandemic evolves and eventually ends or stabilizes, data on the recovery of the Canadian economy will be essential for decision making and policy development. In particular, data tracking business activity, labour market participation and reliance on government assistance programs have been identified as key data. However, the need for the GDP flash estimates will be reduced.

Statistics Canada is aware of the current COVID-19 data needs and is working on addressing gaps going forward. In particular, discussions were held to develop advanced GDP estimates for all provinces based on the work already done by Quebec and Ontario (i.e., release of semi-annual estimates) and to provide access to GDP inputs to users upon request. The increased timeliness of GDP data through GDP flash estimates also provides opportunities to meet Canada's international commitments towards the International Monetary Fund by providing data within targets. Consumer prices data, including the regular CPI, will benefit from a basket update in 2021, including future approaches to these updates. In addition, the use of the adjusted price index as an input will support the quality of the CPI. Discussions are also underway to provide more data on food pricing in the North and on changes in household spending. As well, research is ongoing to improve data consistency and seasonal adjustment of the PEAI to expand its use.

Forward approaches should consider post-pandemic data needs, areas of data gaps, and the ongoing delivery of both emerging and core economic products; moreover, opportunities remain to fully explore the lessons learned from the pandemic

Statistics Canada's rapid response to COVID-19 underscored its ability to meet new data needs during an unprecedented period. The COVID-19 economic statistical products released were largely considered relevant, timely and useful. Nonetheless, significant efforts were necessary to release COVID-19 products in a timely manner without compromising the ongoing delivery of core products.

With the emerging post-pandemic data needs, sustaining the ongoing delivery of both COVID-19-related products and core economic products will be a challenge. Moreover, these emerging needs will likely bring forth other areas of data gaps, in addition to those identified by key users (i.e., household economic data, employment data and industry economic data) during this evaluation.

In light of these considerations, the organization should reflect on its forward approach with a focus on identifying emerging data needs, addressing areas of data gaps where possible, and sustaining the ongoing delivery of both COVID-19-related products and core economic products. Business prioritization, human resources, information technology and source data were identified as key enablers to sustain the ongoing delivery of COVID-19 economic statistical products and core products.

Chart 3: Key enablers to sustain COVID-19 economic statistical products and core products
Business prioritization

As the pandemic evolves, users' data needs will also evolve (e.g., economic recovery), and a robust approach to prioritization that effectively balance new demands with core activities will be needed. Although the use of dedicated teams to develop COVID-19 products was seen as a key success factor at the onset of the pandemic, concerns remain about their capacity to continue delivering COVID-19 products and their regular activities, which mainly consist of research and development activities (e.g., exploring alternative data options). This poses a risk to future innovation activities in the organization.

Human resources

Human resource (HR) management will be crucial to finding, maintaining and enhancing staff expertise and skills. Timely delivery of relevant COVID-19 economic statistics was, in large part, attributable to the expertise of staff. Interviewees noted that building this expertise takes time. Teleworking will provide opportunities to expand the talent pool. However, this addresses only the more junior levels. Efforts targeting well-being and mental health of staff are also seen as contributing to organizational performance.

Information technology

The development of COVID-19 products outside the core infrastructure was important to avoid interference with core products and meet timelines. However, parallel processes pose risks, as independent development could lead to divergence. Interviewees recognized the need to eventually integrate processes into the main infrastructure and to revisit and streamline business processes and methods to deliver on new priorities more efficiently.

Source data

The use of alternative data was key in the creation of new products. The ability to further innovate and develop new products is strongly dependent on the agency's ability to gain access to key data sources as transaction data. Interviewees emphasized the need to continue exploring alternative source data going forward, including a more strategic and efficient data acquisition process. Such data would help address COVID-19 data needs and core activities.

Given that Statistics Canada is continuing to operate in an evolving pandemic, divisions involved in the COVID-19 economic products have not had the opportunity to conduct a full-fledged assessment of lessons learned aimed at finding approaches to improve core activities and benefitting the whole agency. Staff recognized the need to identify such lessons and find approaches to improve core activities to ensure that the organization as a whole builds on its pandemic experience to create synergies for the future. Nonetheless, some preliminary lessons learned were identified:

  • develop a robust long-term HR plan to ensure adequate expertise and succession planning
  • maintain the increased level of internal communication and collaboration implemented during the pandemic (break the silos)
  • challenge the status quo to ensure continuous improvement of processes, methods and data products
  • embed foresight into regular activities to proactively identify data needs.

Leveraging these lessons learned would help the organization further improve its COVID-19 data response and core activities. The lessons learned could also be shared across the agency to foster innovation and continuous improvement in support of the agency-wide response to COVID-19.

How to improve the program

Responsiveness to users' needs

Recommendation 1:
The Assistant Chief Statistician (ACS), Economic Statistics (Field 5), should ensure that a comprehensive strategy is developed to identify, prioritize and respond to emerging data needs (i.e., post-pandemic data), including areas of current data gaps.

The strategy should consider the key enablers identified, and include approaches and/or plans that clearly set out how:

  • emerging data needs will be identified (e.g., stakeholder engagement approaches, international scan);
  • current and emerging data gaps will be addressed;
  • data needs will be prioritized based on intended outcomes and resource capacity; and
  • ongoing monitoring of data needs will be carried out.

Moving Forward

Recommendation 2:
The ACS, Economic Statistics (Field 5), should ensure that a lessons learned exercise from the COVID 19 pandemic is conducted to identify approaches that could be applied to respond to COVID 19 data needs and improve core activities going forward. The lessons learned should be presented to a Tier 1 committee that will provide direction on their potential implementation across the agency, as applicable. They should also be shared across the agency to foster innovation and continuous improvement in support of the agency-wide response to COVID-19.

Management response and action plan

Recommendation 1

The Assistant Chief Statistician (ACS), Economic Statistics (Field 5), should ensure that a comprehensive strategy is developed to identify, prioritizeand respond to emerging data needs (i.e., post-pandemic data), including areas of current data gaps.

The strategy should consider the key enablers identified, and include approaches and/or plans that clearly set out how:

  • emerging data needs will be identified (e.g., stakeholder engagement approaches, international scan);
  • current and emerging data gaps will be addressed;
  • data needs will be prioritized based on intended outcomes and resource capacity; and
  • ongoing monitoring of data needs will be carried out.

Management response

Management agrees with the recommendation.

The Field will develop a comprehensive strategy to identify, prioritize and respond to emerging data needs.

This strategy will explain how data gaps will be addressed and include a process to ensure ongoing monitoring of data needs.

This strategy will consider the key enablers identified (i.e., business prioritization, human resources, information technology, source data) and form the basis for:

  • Prioritization of Field resources
  • Proposals for 'seed funding projects'
  • External funding requests

Deliverables and timelines

The ACS, Economic Statistics (Field 5) will ensure the delivery of the Field 5 strategy document (March 31, 2022).

Recommendation 2

The ACS, Economic Statistics (Field 5), should ensure that a lessons learned exercise from the COVID-19 pandemic is conducted to identify approaches that could be applied to respond to COVID-19 data needs and improve core activities going forward. The lessons learned should be presented to a Tier 1 committee that will provide direction on their potential implementation across the agency, as applicable. They should also be shared across the agency to foster innovation and continuous improvement in support of the agency-wide response to COVID-19.

Management response

Management agrees with the recommendation.

The Field will conduct a lessons learned exercise that will enumerate:

  • New data products that were developed in response to the pandemic
  • New tools and techniques used to develop these products

This exercise will identify strengths and weaknesses in the approach taken, along with recommendations for improvement and best practices that could potentially be leveraged across the agency.

The results of this exercise will be presented to the Modernization Management Committee to foster a fulsome discussion on these lessons learned and their potential implementation agency-wide.

Deliverables and timelines

The ACS, Economic Statistics (Field 5) will ensure the delivery of a report on lessons learned and its presentation to the Modernization Management Committee (January 15, 2022).

Appendix A: List of new economic statistical products released

Industry Accounts Division
Category Date of release Products The Daily release
Gross domestic product by industry: Preliminary Estimate / Flash Estimate April 15, 2020 (March flash GDP) Statistics Canada has been producing flash estimates of monthly GDP starting with the March 2020 reference period and released the product in The Daily. Gross domestic product by industry: Nowcast, March 2020 (March flash GDP)Table note *
Gross domestic product by industry: Preliminary Estimate / Flash Estimate May 29, 2020 (April flash GDP) Statistics Canada has been producing flash estimates of monthly GDP starting with the March 2020 reference period and released the product in The Daily. Gross domestic product by industry, March 2020 (April flash GDP)Table note *
Table note *

The flash estimate for the following month since that date is published in The Daily alongside the preliminary monthly GDP.

Return to table note * referrer

Economic Analysis Division
Category Date of release Products The Daily release
Experimental Economic Activity Indexes for Canadian Provinces and Territories July 14, 2020 Data: Experimental indexes of economic activity in the provinces and territories Study: Experimental economic activity indexes for Canadian provinces and territories, January 2002 to March 2020
Experimental Economic Activity Indexes for Canadian Provinces and Territories July 14, 2020 Analysis: Experimental Economic Activity Indexes for Canadian Provinces and Territories Study: Experimental economic activity indexes for Canadian provinces and territories, January 2002 to March 2020
Experimental Economic Activity Indexes for Canadian Provinces and Territories July 14, 2020 Methods and References: Experimental Economic Activity Indexes for Canadian Provinces and Territories: Experimental Measures Based on Combinations of Monthly Time Series Study: Experimental economic activity indexes for Canadian provinces and territories, January 2002 to March 2020
International Accounts Division
Category Date of release Products The Daily release
Monthly trade of personal protective goods June 4, 2020 Trade in medical and protective goods, April 2020 (first release)

Canadian international merchandise trade, April 2020

Note: Releases occurred every subsequent month.

International Investment Position - Preliminary estimates April 27, 2020 (one-time) Estimated quarterly changes in Canada's international investment position, first quarter 2020 Market turbulences and COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on Canada's international investment position: Preliminary estimates, first quarter 2020
Monthly trade in goods by exporter characteristics May 25, 2020

Trade in Goods by Exporter and Importer Characteristics: Interactive Tool

Note: Monthly trade in goods by exporter characteristics data are available upon request.

Monthly trade in goods by exporter characteristics, March 2020 (first release)

Note: Releases occurred every subsequent month.

Monthly transaction counts May 13, 2020 Data: Monthly import transaction counts (not seasonally adjusted)

Monthly trade in goods by exporter characteristics, March 2020 (first release)

Note: Releases occurred every subsequent month.

Monthly transaction counts May 13, 2020 Analysis: Recent Developments in the Canadian Economy, 2020: COVID-19, first edition

Canadian merchandise import transaction counts, April 2020

Note: Releases occurred every subsequent month.

Consumer Prices Division
Date of release Products (analytical papers) The Daily release
April 8, 2020 Canadian Consumers Prepare for COVID-19 Canadian consumers prepare for COVID-19, December 29, 2019, to June 6, 2020
May 11, 2020 Canadian Consumers Adapt to COVID-19: A Look at Canadian Grocery Sales up to April 11 Study: Canadian consumers adapt to COVID-19: A look at Canadian grocery sales up to April 11
June 10, 2020 Monthly average retail prices for selected products, by province Provincial monthly average retail prices for selected products, April 2020
July 13, 2020 Consumer expenditures during COVID-19: An exploratory analysis of the effects of changing consumption patterns on consumer price indexes Study: Consumer expenditures during COVID-19: An exploratory analysis of the effects of changing consumption patterns on consumer price indexes
October 8, 2020 N/A Adjusting the Consumer Price Index to the new spending realities during the pandemic
April 2020 - October 21, 2020 Technical Supplement for the (March-September) 2020 Consumer Price Index Consumer Price Index, March 2020 - September 2020

CVs for operating revenue - Amusement and recreation - 2020

CVs for operating revenue - Amusement and recreation - 2020
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs for operating revenue - Amusement and recreation - 2020. The information is grouped by Geography (appearing as row headers), CVs for operating revenue by Amusement parks and arcades and Other amusement and recreation industries, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Amusement parks and arcades Other amusement and recreation industries
Canada 2.34 0.72
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.00 2.27
Prince Edward Island 0.00 0.93
Nova Scotia 0.00 1.70
New Brunswick 0.00 1.66
Quebec 3.78 1.72
Ontario 4.99 1.17
Manitoba 3.63 1.21
Saskatchewan 2.99 1.89
Alberta 5.18 1.39
British Columbia 3.74 1.95
Yukon 0.00 0.00
Northwest Territories .. 0.00
Nunavut .. 0.00

Why are we conducting this survey?

The Wholesale Price Report collects prices of product transactions to create the Wholesale Services Price Index (WSPI). This index measures the price movements of services provided by wholesalers and can be joined with other business service indexes to provide better estimates of real output and productivity, monitor inflation and feed an important research agenda at Statistics Canada.

The WSPI can also be used by businesses to measure their performance against industry trends or for international comparisons of productivity, inflation or trade.

Your information may also be used by Statistics Canada for other statistical and research purposes.

Authorization to collect this information

Data are collected under the authority of the Statistics Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, Chapter S-19.

Confidentiality

By law, Statistics Canada is prohibited from releasing any information it collects that could identify any person, business, or organization, unless consent has been given by the respondent, or as permitted by the Statistics Act. Statistics Canada will use the information from this survey for statistical purposes only.

Record linkages

To enhance the data from this survey and to reduce the reporting burden, Statistics Canada may combine the acquired data with information from other surveys or from administrative sources.

Reporting instructions

For each product, please verify the product specifications and the purchase and selling price currencies, and report monthly average purchase prices and monthly average selling prices for the current quarter. Please also report any missing historical data.

The product selected must meet the following criteria:

  • Is a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business,
  • Is sold regularly throughout the year, and
  • Typically generates positive margins (i.e., sold at a higher price than it is purchased).

If a product no longer satisfies the above criteria, please select another product.

If precise figures are not available, please provide your best estimates.

Deadline for completing this questionnaire

Please complete this questionnaire and submit it within 10 days of receipt.

Business or organization and contact information

1. Verify or provide the business or organization's legal and operating name and correct where needed.

Note: Legal name modifications should only be done to correct a spelling error or typo.

  • Legal name
  • Operating name (if applicable)

2. Verify or provide the contact information of the designated business or organization contact person for this questionnaire and correct where needed.

Note: The designated contact person is the person who should receive this questionnaire. The designated contact person may not always be the one who actually completes the questionnaire.

  • First name
  • Last name
  • Title
  • Preferred language of communication
  • Mailing address (number and street)
  • City
  • Province, territory or state
  • Postal code or ZIP code
  • Country
  • Email address
  • Telephone number (including area code)
  • Extension number (if applicable)
  • Fax number (including area code)

3. Verify or provide the current operational status of the business or organization identified by the legal and operating name above.

  • Operational
  • Not currently operational
    • Why is this business or organization not currently operational?
      • Seasonal operations
      • Ceased operations
      • Sold operations
      • Amalgamated with other businesses or organizations
      • Temporarily inactive but will re-open
      • No longer operating due to other reasons
    • When did this business or organization close for the season?
      • Date
    • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
      • Date
    • When did this business or organization cease operations?
      • Date
    • Why did this business or organization cease operations?
      • Bankruptcy
      • Liquidation
      • Dissolution
      • Other
    • Specify the other reasons why the operations ceased
    • When was this business or organization sold?
      • Date
    • What is the legal name of the buyer?
    • When did this business or organization amalgamate?
      • Date
    • What is the legal name of the resulting or continuing business or organization?
    • What are the legal names of the other amalgamated businesses or organizations?
    • When did this business or organization become temporarily inactive?
      • Date
    • When does this business or organization expect to resume operations?
      • Date
    • Why is this business or organization temporarily inactive?
    • When did this business or organization cease operations?
      • Date
    • Why did this business or organization cease operations?

Attach files (if applicable)

4. Our records indicate that this business fulfills its reporting obligations using file attachment(s). Select and attach the required file(s) with pricing information for the reference quarter. You may also attach new or updated files for past periods if necessary.

Component list

5. (First quarter of reporting) According to our records, the following product categories generate the most wholesale revenue for your business.

These product categories were chosen based on typical business activities conducted in your industry. Product classification is based on the North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) version 2017.

For each category, select a product that:

  • Is a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business within this product category,
  • Is sold regularly throughout the year, and
  • Typically generates positive margins (i.e., sold at a higher price than it is purchased).

Product categories may be displayed more than once. This is to facilitate collection of multiple products within the same category. Do not select duplicate products.

(Subsequent quarters) These products were previously reported as representative of the wholesale activity for your business.

(If applicable) To maintain the quality of data Statistics Canada produces for the wholesale industry, we also require information for # additional product(s) sold by your business. If an item is discontinued or no longer available, you will be asked to report for another product.

Product

6. Does the product fall under the following category: Product Category?

7. Indicate the product category to which the product belongs.

Search the product classification: type any product category or name.

8. Does the product meet the following criteria?

  • The product is sold regularly throughout the year.
  • The product is a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business.

9. Was the product available for sale by this business between month 1 and month 3?

10. Why was this product not available for sale between month 1 and month 3?

  • Seasonal item
  • Temporarily out-of-stock or backordered
  • Discontinued or no longer sold
  • Other – specify

11. (First quarter of reporting) Enter the product information for a product within the category:

Product Category.

Select a product that:

  • Is a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business within this product category,
  • Is sold regularly throughout the year, and
  • Typically generates positive margins (i.e., sold at a higher price than it is purchased).

(Subsequent quarters) Verify the product information below and update as necessary.

Product name
Product description
Manufacturer (if applicable)

Is this product currently imported?

  • Yes
    • Select the country
      • China
      • Germany
      • France
      • India
      • Japan
      • Mexico
      • Philippines
      • South Korea
      • United Kingdom
      • United States
      • Other – specify
  • No

Indicate the code used by your business to identify this product.

  • An internal code – specify
  • SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) – specify
  • UPC (Universal Product Code) – specify
  • PLU (Price Look Up) – specify
  • Other – specify

What is the unit of measure for the purchase of this product?

  • Each – specify size or weight
  • In a package e.g., 12 cases per box, 24 packages per case, 12 cartons per case, 24 units per carton – specify number of items and size or weight
  • In bulk e.g., per kilogram, litre, metre – specify size or weight
  • Other – specify size or weight
  • What is the unit of measure for the sale of this product?
  • Each – specify size or weight
  • In a package e.g., 12 cases per box, 24 packages per case, 12 cartons per case, 24 units per carton – specify number of items and size or weight
  • In bulk e.g., per kilogram, litre, metre – specify size or weight
  • Other – specify size or weight

12. In what currency will you report the average purchase price and the average selling price for this product?

Note: If you have already converted prices in foreign currencies to Canadian dollars, please select "Canadian Dollars (CAN$)".

Purchase Price Currency

  • Canadian Dollars (CAN$)
  • American Dollars (US$)
  • Euros (€)
  • Japanese Yen (JP¥)
  • Chinese Yuan (CN¥)
  • Mexican Pesos (MXN)
  • Other – specify

Selling Price Currency

  • Canadian Dollars (CAN$)
  • American Dollars (US$)
  • Euros (€)
  • Japanese Yen (JP¥)
  • Chinese Yuan (CN¥)
  • Mexican Pesos (MXN)
  • Other – specify

13. (First quarter of reporting) Report monthly average prices for the product for the historical months listed below.

(Subsequent quarters) Review the monthly average prices for the product for the historical months listed below and correct as necessary.

If the business did not previously report prices for the historical months, report the missing information.

Report prices in the exact amount with 2 decimals.
e.g., 100.67, 100000.98.

Purchase price is the cost incurred by your business to acquire the product.
Include adjustments for discounts, rebates and freight.

Selling price is the amount received by your business for selling this product.
Include adjustments for discounts and promotions.
Exclude taxes and freight.

  • Historical months
    • Purchase Price and Selling Price for historical month 0
    • Purchase Price and Selling Price for historical month 1
    • Purchase Price and Selling Price for historical month 2
    • Purchase Price and Selling Price for historical month 3

14. (Subsequent quarters) Did you revise the purchase price and/or the selling price between historical month 0 and historical month 3?

15. Report monthly average prices for the product for the months listed below.

Report prices in the exact amount with 2 decimals.
e.g., 100.67, 100000.98.

Purchase price is the cost incurred by your business to acquire the product.
Include adjustments for discounts, rebates and freight.

Selling price is the amount received by your business for selling this product.
Include adjustments for discounts and promotions.
Exclude taxes and freight.

  • Current quarter
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for current quarter month 1
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for current quarter month 2
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for current quarter month 3

16. For any month where the purchase price is not reported, select the reason why the purchase price is not reported

  • Seasonal item
  • Temporarily out-of-stock or Backordered
  • No purchases
  • Other reason – Specify

17. For any month where the selling price is not reported, select the reason why the selling price is not reported

  • Seasonal item
  • Temporarily out-of-stock or Backordered
  • No sales
  • Other reason – Specify

18. For any month where there was a change in the purchase price, select the main reason for the change in purchase price

  • Change in contract terms
  • Change in freight cost
  • Change in product or product characteristics
  • Change in supplier
  • Change in supply or demand
  • Commodity markets
  • Competition
  • Exchange rate
  • Other (e.g., regulation change, weather, etc.)
  • Comments (optional)

19. For any month where there was a change in the selling price, select the main reason for the change in selling price

  • Change in contract terms
  • Change in customer(s)
  • Change in operating costs
  • Change in product or product characteristics
  • Change in purchase price of product
  • Change in supply or demand
  • Commodity markets
  • Competition
  • Exchange rate
  • Promotion / End of Promotion
  • Other (e.g., regulation change, weather, etc.)
  • Comments (optional)

Product replacement (if applicable)

20. You indicated that the product was not available for sale.

OR Our records indicate that the average monthly selling prices reported for the product were frequently lower than the average monthly purchase prices, resulting in negative margins. OR The product does not belong to the following category: Product Category. OR Our records indicate that the product has not been regularly purchased or sold throughout the year. OR You indicated that the product is not sold regularly throughout the year and is not a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business.

Between month 1 and month 2, did this business have another product available for sale within the following category: Product Category?

Select a product that:

  • Is a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business within this product category,
  • Is sold regularly throughout the year, and
  • Typically generates positive margins (i.e., sold at a higher price than it is purchased).

21. Select the product category that generates the most wholesale revenue for your business.

The product categories listed were chosen based on typical business activities conducted in your industry.

22. Enter the product information for a replacement product within the category: Product Category.

Select a product that:

  • Is a major annual wholesale revenue generator for this business within this product category,
  • Is sold regularly throughout the year, and
  • Typically generates positive margins (i.e., sold at a higher price than it is purchased).

Product name
Product description
Manufacturer (if applicable)

Is this product currently imported?

  • Yes
    • Select the country
      • China
      • Germany
      • France
      • India
      • Japan
      • Mexico
      • Philippines
      • South Korea
      • United Kingdom
      • United States
      • Other – specify
  • No

Indicate the code used by your business to identify this product.

  • An internal code – specify
  • SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) – specify
  • UPC (Universal Product Code) – specify
  • PLU (Price Look Up) – specify
  • Other – specify

What is the unit of measure for the purchase of this product?

  • Each – specify size or weight
  • In a package e.g., 12 cases per box, 24 packages per case, 12 cartons per case, 24 units per carton – specify number of items and size or weight
  • In bulk e.g., per kilogram, litre, metre – specify size or weight
  • Other – specify size or weight

What is the unit of measure for the sale of this product?

  • Each – specify size or weight
  • In a package e.g., 12 cases per box, 24 packages per case, 12 cartons per case, 24 units per carton – specify number of items and size or weight
  • In bulk e.g., per kilogram, litre, metre – specify size or weight
  • Other – specify size or weight

23. In what currency will you report the average purchase price and the average selling price for this product?

Note: If you have already converted prices in foreign currencies to Canadian dollars, please select "Canadian Dollars (CAN$)".

Purchase Price Currency

  • Canadian Dollars (CAN$)
  • American Dollars (US$)
  • Euros (€)
  • Japanese Yen (JP¥)
  • Chinese Yuan (CN¥)
  • Mexican Pesos (MXN)
  • Other – specify

Selling Price Currency

  • Canadian Dollars (CAN$)
  • American Dollars (US$)
  • Euros (€)
  • Japanese Yen (JP¥)
  • Chinese Yuan (CN¥)
  • Mexican Pesos (MXN)
  • Other – specify

24. Report monthly average prices for the product for the months listed below.

Report prices in the exact amount with 2 decimals.
e.g., 100.67, 100000.98.

Purchase price is the cost incurred by your business to acquire the product.
Include adjustments for discounts, rebates and freight.

Selling price is the amount received by your business for selling this product.
Include adjustments for discounts and promotions.
Exclude taxes and freight.

  • Previous quarter
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for historical month 3
  • Current quarter
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for current quarter month 1
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for current quarter month 2
  • Purchase Price and Selling Price for current quarter month 3

25. For any month where the purchase price is not reported, select the reason why the purchase price is not reported

  • Seasonal item
  • Temporarily out-of-stock or Backordered
  • No purchases
  • Other reason – Specify

26. For any month where the selling price is not reported, select the reason why the selling price is not reported

  • Seasonal item
  • Temporarily out-of-stock or Backordered
  • No sales
  • Other reason – Specify

27. For any month where there was a change in the purchase price, select the main reason for the change in purchase price

  • Change in contract terms
  • Change in freight cost
  • Change in product or product characteristics
  • Change in supplier
  • Change in supply or demand
  • Commodity markets
  • Competition
  • Exchange rate
  • Other (e.g., regulation change, weather, etc.)
  • Comments (optional)

28. For any month where there was a change in the selling price, select the main reason for the change in selling price

  • Change in contract terms
  • Change in customer(s)
  • Change in operating cost
  • Change in product or product characteristics
  • Change in purchase price of product
  • Change in supply or demand
  • Commodity markets
  • Competition
  • Exchange rate
  • Promotion / End of Promotion
  • Other (e.g., regulation change, weather, etc.)
  • Comments (optional)

Contact person

29. Statistics Canada may need to contact the person who completed this questionnaire for further information.

Is FirstName LastName the best person to contact?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Who is the best person to contact about this questionnaire?
    • First name
    • Last name
    • Title
    • Email address
    • Telephone number (including area code)
    • Extension number (if applicable)
    • Fax number (including area code)

Feedback

30. How long did it take to complete this questionnaire? Include the time spent gathering the necessary information.

  • Hours
  • Minutes

31. Do you have any comments about this questionnaire?

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures – Q2 2021

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures, including expenditures at origin and those for air commercial transportation in Canada, in Thousands of Dollars (x 1,000)
Table summary
This table displays the results of C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures. The information is grouped by Duration of trip (appearing as row headers), Main Trip Purpose, Country or Region of Expenditures (Total, Canada, United States, Overseas) calculated using Visit-Expenditures in Thousands of Dollars (x 1,000) and c.v. as units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Duration of Visit Main Trip Purpose Country or Region of Expenditures
Total Canada United States Overseas
$ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V.
Total Duration Total Main Trip Purpose 6,549,026 B 5,469,437 A 224,536 E 855,053 E
Holiday, leisure or recreation 2,920,154 A 2,714,059 A 92,142 E 113,953 E
Visit friends or relatives 1,130,153 A 1,083,920 A 20,770 E 25,463 E
Personal conference, convention or trade show 22,082 D 22,012 D 69 E ..  
Shopping, non-routine 392,916 B 392,916 B ..   ..  
Other personal reasons 865,356 C 617,957 B 89,301 E 158,097 E
Business conference, convention or trade show 26,304 E 13,090 E 13,214 E ..  
Other business 1,192,061 E 625,481 B 9,040 E 557,540 E
Same-Day Total Main Trip Purpose 2,119,964 A 2,113,785 A 6,179 E ..  
Holiday, leisure or recreation 778,121 B 775,656 B 2,465 E ..  
Visit friends or relatives 428,921 B 425,206 B 3,714 E ..  
Personal conference, convention or trade show 9,600 E 9,600 E ..   ..  
Shopping, non-routine 349,497 B 349,497 B ..   ..  
Other personal reasons 299,511 B 299,511 B ..   ..  
Business conference, convention or trade show 1,832 E 1,832 E ..   ..  
Other business 252,482 B 252,482 B ..   ..  
Overnight Total Main Trip Purpose 4,429,062 B 3,355,652 A 218,357 E 855,053 E
Holiday, leisure or recreation 2,142,033 B 1,938,403 A 89,677 E 113,953 E
Visit friends or relatives 701,232 B 658,713 B 17,055 E 25,463 E
Personal conference, convention or trade show 12,482 E 12,413 E 69 E ..  
Shopping, non-routine 43,419 D 43,419 D ..   ..  
Other personal reasons 565,844 D 318,446 B 89,301 E 158,097 E
Business conference, convention or trade show 24,472 E 11,258 E 13,214 E ..  
Other business 939,579 E 372,999 B 9,040 E 557,540 E
..
data not available

Estimates contained in this table have been assigned a letter to indicate their coefficient of variation (c.v.) (expressed as a percentage). The letter grades represent the following coefficients of variation:

A
c.v. between or equal to 0.00% and 5.00% and means Excellent.
B
c.v. between or equal to 5.01% and 15.00% and means Very good.
C
c.v. between or equal to 15.01% and 25.00% and means Good.
D
c.v. between or equal to 25.01% and 35.00% and means Acceptable.
E
c.v. greater than 35.00% and means Use with caution.

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Person-Trips by Duration of Trip, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Trip Destination – Q2 2021

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Person-Trips by Duration of Trip, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Trip Destination – Q2 2021
Table summary
This table displays the results of C.V.s for Person-Trips by Duration of Trip, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Trip Destination. The information is grouped by Duration of trip (appearing as row headers), Main Trip Purpose, Country or Region of Trip Destination (Total, Canada, United States, Overseas) calculated using Person-Trips in Thousands (× 1,000) and C.V. as a units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Duration of Trip Main Trip Purpose Country or Region of Trip Destination
Total Canada United States Overseas
Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V. Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V. Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V. Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V.
Total Duration Total Main Trip Purpose 38,750 A 38,414 A 243 E 92 C
Holiday, leisure or recreation 16,528 A 16,338 A 162 E 28 E
Visit friends or relatives 12,131 A 12,058 A 41 E 31 E
Personal conference, convention or trade show 130 D 130 D 0 E ..  
Shopping, non-routine 2,137 B 2,137 B ..   ..  
Other personal reasons 4,522 A 4,482 A 23 E 17 E
Business conference, convention or trade show 74 D 69 D 5 E ..  
Other business 3,228 B 3,200 B 11 E 16 E
Same-Day Total Main Trip Purpose 27,203 A 27,042 A 161 E ..  
Holiday, leisure or recreation 10,049 A 9,918 A 131 E ..  
Visit friends or relatives 8,556 A 8,534 A 22 E ..  
Personal conference, convention or trade show 102 E 102 E ..   ..  
Shopping, non-routine 2,036 B 2,036 B ..   ..  
Other personal reasons 3,734 B 3,732 B 2 E ..  
Business conference, convention or trade show 40 E 40 E ..   ..  
Other business 2,686 B 2,679 B 7 E ..  
Overnight Total Main Trip Purpose 11,547 A 11,373 A 82 E 92 C
Holiday, leisure or recreation 6,479 A 6,419 A 32 E 28 E
Visit friends or relatives 3,574 B 3,524 B 19 E 31 E
Personal conference, convention or trade show 28 E 28 E 0 E ..  
Shopping, non-routine 101 C 101 C ..   ..  
Other personal reasons 789 B 750 B 21 E 17 E
Business conference, convention or trade show 34 E 29 E 5 E ..  
Other business 542 B 521 B 5 E 16 E
..
data not available

Estimates contained in this table have been assigned a letter to indicate their coefficient of variation (c.v.) (expressed as a percentage). The letter grades represent the following coefficients of variation:

A
c.v. between or equal to 0.00% and 5.00% and means Excellent.
B
c.v. between or equal to 5.01% and 15.00% and means Very good.
C
c.v. between or equal to 15.01% and 25.00% and means Good.
D
c.v. between or equal to 25.01% and 35.00% and means Acceptable.
E
c.v. greater than 35.00% and means Use with caution.

National Travel Survey: Response Rate – Q2 2021

National Travel Survey Q2 2021: Response Rate
Table summary
This table displays the results of Response Rate. The information is grouped by Province of residence (appearing as row headers), Unweighted and Weighted (appearing as column headers), calculated using percentage unit of measure (appearing as column headers).
Province of residence Unweighted Weighted
Percentage
Newfoundland and Labrador 27.0 25.1
Prince Edward Island 27.1 25.2
Nova Scotia 35.0 31.7
New Brunswick 32.3 28.6
Quebec 37.5 33.3
Ontario 36.8 34.4
Manitoba 38.0 34.5
Saskatchewan 33.5 30.7
Alberta 31.6 30.1
British Columbia 36.5 34.7
Canada 34.9 33.4

Eh Sayers Episode 1 - Talk about the barriers, not the disability: Activity limitations and COVID-19

Release date: November 25, 2021

Catalogue number: 45-20-0003
ISSN: 2816-2250

Eh Sayers podcast

This first episode of Eh Sayers is a heart-felt discussion on disability in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We discuss the realities of people living with disabilities, their challenges and all the changes that the pandemic has brought in their daily lives.

Host

Tegan Bridge

Guests

  • Tony Labillois, Director of Public Sector Statistics and Champion for Persons with Disabilities at Statistics Canada
  • Michelle Maroto, Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Alberta

Listen to audio

Eh Sayers Episode 1 - Talk about the barriers, not the disability: Activity limitations and COVID-19 - Transcript

Anonymous 1: Hello, I'm blind, and last year, 2020, when COVID started, it affected my husband and I. My husband, who's bipolar, became more manic with all the changes brought on by COVID, and I as a blind person was not able to cope with his erratic behaviour and had him brought to a hospital for treatment.

Anonymous 2: So, service dog training, like we go to malls, we go to parks--places to get them used to different things, but with the COVID and everything, it's like, I don't want to risk myself going out but like sometimes I'm like I kinda have to in order to train.

Anonymous 1: People talk about online shopping, online delivery, online meetings, and of course, they are very convenient, but for blind people, we use screen reading software, we find that a lot of websites and online apps are still not fully accessible.

Tegan: Welcome to the very first episode of Eh Sayers. It's a podcast from Statistics Canada, where we meet the people behind the data and explore the stories behind the numbers. I'm your host, Tegan. If you heard the preview we released June 3, you can skip ahead to about 11 and a half minutes in if you'd prefer to only hear the new content. Today, we're talking about disability. According to the 2017 Canadian Survey on Disability, more than 6 million Canadians aged 15 and over report having a disability. That's about 1 in 5 Canadians. So what do we mean when we say persons with disabilities?

Tony: Well, it can mean many things for many people, and some people will will have activity limitations and probably will not even think of themselves as being a person with a disability. We mean people with visible and invisible conditions that may affect them in their daily life or in their daily work.

Tegan: That's Tony Labillois.

Tony: My name is Tony Labillois. I'm the Director for public sector Statistics Division at Statistics Canada, and I'm also the champion for persons with disabilities in our organization since 2002. And I'm visually impaired since I was born. I have low vision. And for me it's normal vision.

Tegan: 1.5 million Canadians aged 15 years and over have a seeing disability, like Tony. What do you mean by invisible conditions?

Tony: You see, immediately, when you meet someone, like you will see that I have dancing eyes, if you see me, you notice that my eyes are different. So you know that I'm visually impaired or there's something different. But there's a lot of invisible disabilities, there's a lot of people where you will meet the person and you could not know that they have an activity limitation. And think about things like learning disability, mental health challenge, or even pain, chronic pain or hypersensitivity to the environment. All those things are affecting us as human beings, either for an episode of our life or permanently. And that's what can be included in persons with disabilities. But it doesn't mean that the person would recognize himself or herself as having a disability or being part of that group. It's a question of acceptance or a question of perception of our experiences... yeah our experiences.

Tegan: Could you talk a bit more about that? Why a person might not identify themselves as having a disability?

Tony: Yes, absolutely. I remember the time that when I was not even sure if I should self identify, or I wasn't sure I was even accepting myself as I was, as a teenager. And as we evolve as human beings, or as our condition evolves, as human beings, that perception might change. Unfortunately, disability or an activity limitation is something that can be acquired. So it may change our perception of ourselves. And it may change the way we answer a question, if there's a question, are you a person with disability? Yes or no. But there's also even despite the condition itself, there's a level of trust in ourselves and trust in others, acceptance of ourselves and the way we feel that we will be accepted or not by others, that will have an influence on us self declaring, especially if it's invisible. Someone wouldn't have to necessarily self declare.

So I may choose especially if it's an invisible disability not to disclose, we're all facing that as we're getting older. Unfortunately, we can acquire a disability, something very simple in many people's lives when they get in their 40s. And suddenly, they don't see as well as they used to, and suddenly they need glasses. But before they accept for themselves that they need to go see optometrist and get the right prescription, they will often try to look at a piece of paper that they receive in the mail or something else a bit further or closer to try to get the right focus and so on. It's a very simple example where there's the need to accept that they will need that accommodation in their life. It's usually something that will not generate any discrimination in society because many people already have glasses, and it's accepted socially and professionally, that people can be efficient even when they have glasses and other persons with disabilities need other recommendations sometimes or not. And but they often are not certain that these accommodations or their different ways of doing something will be as accepted as glasses would be or using glasses would be.

Tegan: Invisible disabilities may be more common than you might expect. For example, in 2017, just over 4 million Canadians aged 15 years and older had a pain-related disability and over 2 million had a mental health-related disability. Tony told us a little more about the reality of living with an invisible disability.

Tony: It means that you can choose, it means that you can choose not to ever divulge it, and to live with that choice. And it means that you can choose to tell others and live with that choice as well. Think of someone with a diagnostic of anxiety and that person is evolving in the workplace and is having issues at certain point in time. And if he or she chooses not to say anything, that means that it may affect the person very much and even affect the colleagues very much without nobody knowing that there is a specific condition that could be considered and could be accommodated. So, it's true for any invisible disability. But think also if suddenly that person decides to divulge the fact that he or she has an anxiety problem. Well, suddenly, if it's accepted, again, it's a question of trust and acceptance. If it's accepted by the person, and the person doesn't feel she will be stigmatized or limited by that with the perception of others. If she feels that the workplace is conducive enough to discuss mental health issues, or any invisible disabilities, suddenly, an accommodations can be put in place, even the person can get coaching or the person can get some help in stressful moments, the person can even just be able to say that she's stressed and that will relieve some stress. Maybe the only accommodation that that person will need, to know that she can ask frequently to the boss if everything is going well. Instead of ruminating and having ideas in your mind so there's a choice there to say or not say something which is not the case with something visible. I mean, people will probably ask questions even about something visible if if we pretend it's not there.

Tegan: Then, it's much more complicated than a yes/no question. "Are you a person with a disability, yes or no?" It's not always that simple, is it?

Tony: Yeah, we have a social model to measure disability, like in our Canadian survey on disability done in 2017 and the one we will do in 2022, after the census, we will make use of a social model, where we don't look at the medical conditions of the people, we mostly look at the potential activity limitations and potential barriers that they face in the environment that they're in for their life or for work, and with scales also for light, moderate, and high impact of these things.

Tegan: And, and why is it especially important to acknowledge that hidden disability exists especially during the pandemic, both to acknowledge that it exists in other people we might interact with, but also, you know, within yourself, within ourselves.

Tony: This pandemic brought a lot of new opportunities and a lot of challenges too. There are some invisible things that now are activity limitations for people that may never perceive themselves as persons with disabilities, they will likely never tick that box on a questionnaire if you ask them "Are you a person with disability or not?" You think of someone with weak immune system, with someone, someone with pulmonary disease, someone with newly developed phobia of the public space, these people don't perceive themselves and may they perceive themselves as a person with disability and that's okay. But that they will likely need accommodations. In fact, all of us we need accommodations to work from home for example, the way many of us will do now, even if we are not with disabilities. An analyst would need two screens to work efficiently and it's not a disability. It's a question of productivity like it is for anybody with activity limitations. Analysis is more easily done with lots of space to actually conduct it.

Another important aspect is that the pandemic has taught us that it could be any one of us that would suddenly face an activity limitation. If you think of the people with weak immune system or with pulmonary disease or other conditions, suddenly, from one day to the next, because the context, they faced a situation that they had never envisioned. And that impacts on their ability to participate in a physical workplace or in society in general. It could be any of us that suddenly faced this, we could have a context or our own personal health could evolve. And it will have an impact on our ability to contribute, work or to participate in, in society and in the economy of Canada. And it becomes very important that we all build an inclusive world, an inclusive workplace, an inclusive economy and society so that we're not going to face an inability to contribute or to participate, even if the context would change, or even if our own health would change as we get older.

Michelle: So things like accessibility, flexibility, accommodations are definitely so important. So they give people with disabilities the ability to work, to engage in employment. And this is because they address the environmental barriers that can make disability limiting.

Tegan: That's Michelle Maroto.

Michelle: I'm Michelle Maroto and I'm an associate professor of sociology at the University of Alberta.

I tend to focus on things related to inequality or stratification, which is the more structural aspects of inequality. And then sometimes things come up in life, so COVID-19. There's a lot to study around that we see it in the news and I want to keep going and learn a little bit more about it.

Tegan: Michelle and her team used data from StatCan's Canadian Survey of Financial Security to compare nonhousing assets between households with and without disabilities.

Michelle: In this recent project we focused on non housing assets, so these are people's assets that aren't within their houses, so their savings accounts, their pensions and this can be really important for security because these are things that are easier to access when things go bad, so when you have financial hardship you can more easily withdraw money from your savings account to keep going than remortgage your house. And we used data from the survey of financial security over three waves. So from 1999 up until 2012, we looked at and we found that households where someone has a disability tend to own a lot less in terms of non housing assets. So we saw that they owned about 25% less than households that didn't have disabilities, and one of the things we also looked at was how this might be related to employment. So we know that one of the ways in which people can build their assets comes from their income, so if you're in better job so you can put money away, save it on a regular basis and that'll help your wealth. And we know that people with disabilities have less access to the labour market, so this is a situation where that definitely plays into things. But even after considering employment disparities, we still saw these gaps as well.

Tegan: A 25% difference sounds like a lot. Can you put that in perspective for our listeners? Is there a dollar difference between two average people, one with and one without disabilities, when controlling for factors like education, employment and family structure?

Michelle: Yes, so we looked at this as a percent difference 'cause we can see it very across that distribution. But at the middle it was about a $22,000 difference, which that's a big amount of money. If you're thinking about it in terms of wealth.

Tegan: Why is wealth disparity an important factor to consider in the context of a global pandemic?

Michelle: Well, so answering this question I think really comes down to capturing some of the differences between income and wealth more broadly. So what they are and what they do, and income generally refers to money that you have coming in, so it's that flow of resources and for most people we get most of our income from employment from our wages and our salaries. And a lot of research. This is also really common measure that we use when we think about inequality. It's something that's easy to access. We talk about it in surveys, we can access it in people's tax returns if we're looking at it. But wealth doesn't really tell the full story or income doesn't really tell the full story. That's why I also like to think about wealth as well. And wealth refers to everything you own minus everything you out, so your assets minus your debts, and that really makes it more of a stock measure that can build over time. So it presents certain benefits and a stability that income doesn't necessarily present to people, and it can include things like money in your bank account or the home you own, or having a retirement savings. And I think for most people this means stability. And when we got hit with a pandemic, this made these disparities really clear. So what do you rely on when your income disappears and one of the first things people look towards is their savings accounts if they have them. After that they look towards borrowing, so that might be through loans, but it's often through credit cards. But again, you need access to lending institutions. And then you might depend upon family and friends, but that also becomes pretty limited. So when that income disappears, when that flow of resources coming in, that's where wealth becomes really important. And that's why I think during the pandemic especially, we've seen these wealth disparities really put front and center again.

Tegan: The Canadian Survey on Disability found that 1.6 million Canadians with disabilities were unable to afford required aids, devices, or prescription medications due to cost. So, based on your findings, are many people facing a real conflict between wanting to work and wanting to keep themselves safe from the virus?

Michelle: Oh, absolutely yes. And I mean, this is especially true for people with disabilities and chronic health conditions. Since there are more risks already for developing complications with COVID-19. And a lot of our employed respondents were in jobs that allow them to transition to working from home. They're also in jobs that would give them options to take leave as well, but a lot of people didn't have these options, and this is particularly true for people in the retail industry in the service area industry. Where these jobs mean a lot of contact with lots of people on a regular basis. Which can make it really risky. Do you want to keep getting my paycheck or do I want to make sure I stay healthy and that's really tough for people to decide about.

Tegan: In terms of employment, there was a 21 percentage points difference between those with and without disabilities. 80% of those without disabilities were employed compared to 59% of those with disabilities. So could you explain to our listeners how someone who has remained in their job could still face financial insecurity?

Michelle: So we tend to think of work as this way out of poverty and the means of providing financial security and upward mobility for people. And these are all good things. But this isn't actually true for everyone. For a lot of people, having a job today doesn't mean you're going to have a job tomorrow or next month or next week. And when we looked within our sample, we saw that about half of employed respondents were concerned that they could lose their jobs in the next month, and 40% were concerned about losing them throughout the pandemic. So we saw a lot of concerns about job loss when people weren't sure that their jobs would still be there and generally work is precarious these days. And then especially so, during a pandemic, and even if you still have a job, a lot of jobs don't pay very well. They don't offer very good benefits, and people with disabilities tend to be over represented in these jobs and that's kind of where some of my earlier research focused on this over representation in certain jobs that aren't so great. So work doesn't necessarily mean security for people, unfortunately.

Tegan: Yeah, talk about. Yeah, talk about like stress and anxiety like yeah.

Michelle: Yes, exactly.

Tegan: A third of the employed respondents reported that their financial situation had worsened compared to the previous year. These were people who had not lost their jobs, and they still found themselves in a worse position after a year. StatCan's crowdsourcing survey conducted in the summer of 2020 showed that almost one-third of participants reported that their household income decreased since the start of the pandemic. Of these, over half reported difficulty in meeting their food and grocery needs. Can you talk a little bit about why more than a third of your employed respondents still found that their financial situation had worsened compared to the previous year?

Michelle: So the primary reason here is related to income losses. So a lot of people still had jobs, but they were working reduced hours and had reduced incomes. So those who had some savings to fall back on were doing better. But that was really a small percentage of respondents, and there were also respondents who discussed things like a loss of community supports and services that they had been able to access prior to the pandemic and something also faced increased cost. So if you're isolating at home, those delivery costs can add up and help might become harder to find as well.

Tegan: The threat of financial insecurity, the threat of losing your livelihood, that's stressful at any point, but when paired with the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic it's a recipe for a strain on mental health. Michelle, could we talk about mental health? What did you find in your research?

Michelle: Sure, yeah. So during the pandemic last summer we started a study where we wanted to see how people with disabilities and chronic health conditions were managing under COVID-19. We did a survey in June and then we followed up with a bunch of interviews with people to kind of expand upon that. And with our survey data we asked people about whether or not they had experienced some increases in anxiety, increases in stress or increases in despair. During the pandemic, and those are sort of some measures of mental health status. So we have a lot of different ways to measure mental health. This is kind of a quick and easy way to do that in a short survey with people, and then we looked at how these outcomes were related to certain factors. So one of the things we looked at was whether or not people who had COVID-19 affect their finances in a negative way saw these increases. So, for instance, we asked if COVID-19 had limited people's ability to pay debt or pay bills or purchase groceries. And for those who had said yes to this question, they were more likely to report that their anxiety had increased, their stress had increased, and their despair had increased, when we're comparing people who didn't have those negative financial effects, so we can kind of see those effects on finances. Also affected mental health, and we looked at some other things too, so we saw that people who reported being more concerned about contracting the virus also reported increases in anxiety and stress. And then we also saw this really strong relationship between changes in loneliness and belonging, and increases in stress and anxiety. So people who were feeling lonelier also had big increases in stress and anxiety. People who said that their feelings of belonging had decreased also had these big increases in stress and anxiety, so we can kind of see that isolation overlapping with those mental health effects as well.

Tegan: StatCan data seem to back that up. Information collected via a crowdsource questionnaire in June and July 2020 on the experiences of Canadians aged 15 and older with long-term conditions and disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that over half of participants reported their mental health is worse than it was prior to the start of the pandemic. This decline in mental health was also seen in the general population after the start of physical distancing. This may be related to feelings of isolation and being separated from normal social supports as a result of social distancing. Participants with long-term conditions or disabilities could be more impacted during the pandemic since many rely on formal and informal social supports and almost half receive help with daily activities.

Isolation is definitely something I think many of us are struggling with right now. Can confirm, personally. Michelle, could you talk about the effect of isolation on people with disabilities?

Michelle: In the case of people with disabilities, they have already experienced high levels of isolation. We have a lot of research that says they have smaller social networks. They have fewer friends, they have fewer social interactions. And this is partly due to aspects related to disability itself, so it can limit mobility, can limit social interactions, but I think it's also due to a lot of the negative stereotypes around disability as well as the barriers that limit participation in society. So, for instance, if you don't have access to employment, you don't have work friends, you don't have that type of social interaction and really the pandemic has made all this worse, so we've had to actually limit those social action social interactions to keep safe. And this has been a particularly important for people with disabilities and chronic health conditions because they are more likely to have complications with the virus, so they're likely taking extra measures in this case, which is increasing social isolation and limiting those interactions.

Tegan: Michelle wasn't the only one to bring up isolation. When I asked Tony about some of the challenges people with disabilities face during the pandemic, isolation was at the top of the list.

Tony: The first challenge that comes to my mind--and I'm surprised even myself--is feeling isolated. Some people with severe disabilities feel... still feel and felt isolated before the pandemic and feeling isolated, even in the crowds. Or sometimes at home, feeling different... if you don't accept yourself well, if you're not feel accepted by others and included by others, even if you get a job, if you're not fully included to achieve the objectives of the team and contribute to these results. That's probably the worst thing that they feel. They feel alone and isolated. Sometimes they they feel undervalued and that's not very good. As as society and as organizations, we need to make sure we don't leave any talent on the table. We need to make sure that we give the proper accommodations so that we can benefit from the potential the abilities of people with activity limitations. Another unique way that people with disabilities have been affected with the current situation we're facing is especially for the ones who need some help in their daily life. That people that suddenly would need that help would be having more difficulties to get it in the correct conditions, either through volunteers or through family members and so on, or through services and that certainly has become a challenge for many people with disabilities.

Tegan: Before the pandemic, almost half of those with a disability received help with daily activities because of their condition. Of those, 36% relied only on help from outside their household.

Michelle: So a lot of people have paid or unpaid help that they might live with that might be coming in, and that's been limited, so there's been less access to that which is made it harder to do those activities of daily living. But it's also increased isolation as well, so those things have been kind of building on each other.

Tegan: So, Michelle, I have to say that the thing that struck me most when I was reading your research is just how much the stressors pile on each other. Disability can limit your income while also meaning that you have additional expenses, plus other people in your home might have to take time away from their work to help out. In the pandemic, the average person with a disability is likely to work in a job where they have a higher chance of catching COVID-19, and then if they do, they're more likely to have complications, and it just seems like it never really ends. It's just one thing after the next.

Michelle: Yeah, and I think this applies to inequality more broadly going into the pandemic, so we know that a lot of people are better off than others. When we started out the pan-- that with the pandemic and what we've unfortunately seen is there's there's been a divergence, so people who came into the pandemic in good jobs with more money in their bank accounts, owning homes, they're doing OK, and people are still struggling in different ways. But in terms of finances, we see at the top of the distribution people doing OK that way. At the bottom of the distribution, it's been a very, very different story and as you mentioned, if we're thinking about this with disability, we're thinking about a group of people going into the pandemic with lower rates of employment. Many who were reliant on government benefits that aren't so great, that aren't necessarily giving people enough money to get by each month. Many people who are also relying on maybe outside help, but more often family caregivers who have to often sacrifice other employment and wages. To do that, caregiving to be involved that way. So again, this is something that is building and expanding inequality and as a society we have the ability to intervene in different ways, to deal with inequality, to make it a little bit smaller. Unfortunately we don't always do that so I think CERB was something that has been a great benefit and really helps people who had had employment beforehand. We see a lot of the data that people who at the very bottom of the income distribution who had lost employment didn't totally fall off, so they were able to get by. But this is also situation that points out that we can't just type benefits to employment when we do that, we see what happens. You lose employment and it goes away. We have to think about benefits more broadly and supporting people throughout our income distribution, and I think that's one of the things that this pandemic has made really apparent to me is, again, the urgency of thinking about our policy is on a broader level, thinking about how various groups, so people with disabilities, but other minority groups and other groups to experience very low levels of income, high levels of poverty, that we want to consider those in policy making. We want to consider OK, how can we actually go in and redistribute all the benefits that are coming through our society? How do we have a situation where they don't just get stuck at the very top, to the very small 1% of people up there? And I think those are things we really have to consider in different ways. I try to be hopeful. I try to think about this as a break in what has been going on. So crises can also offer opportunities so we can change how we do things. We can change how we're thinking about policy, how we're thinking about supporting people within our society. And perhaps seeing what has happened in this pandemic, putting inequality right front and center for so many people might just do that. So I'm going to try to be hopeful as we kind of still muddle through this next wave of the pandemic, but we'll see, it's hard to tell right now.

Tony: The pandemic has brought some opportunities, but also some challenges that there's some there's some things we need to discuss because they're not fully resolved. If you think of all the Plexiglas that's been put in the public space, they're a challenge for me. So I look forward for them to be removed, but I understand that they won't be removed before the sanitary measures are not needed.

Tegan: Could you talk more about that, the challenges? What do you mean when you say plexiglass is a challenge for you?

Tony: If you think of my own experience, as someone with low vision, I could still travel around the world and take a public bus or go to a store. And there are some barriers that have appeared since then, that I look forward, that they'll be removed once the sanitary guidelines are back to normal. For example, if I don't drive a car, which is a constraint that I have in my life, I will need to take public transport. So by taking public transport, I have more risk of catching the virus. And I don't do that. So even if I take public transport, there would be some plexiglass in some places, or there would be a place where I would need to tap the card at the grocery store, and there's still a plexiglass. So there's a more risk to hit my face on the Plexiglas and more risk of catching the virus even by being forced to type my pin in the terminal. Because I look closely to the terminal. And I touch with my fingers. Something socially accepted that at the grocery store, I could just take a box of something and look closely at the box to read what's on it. It's not accepted anymore, easily in society, I feel that it's something that I should not do, given that what I would not like others to do with the food that I bring home. So until that time, when we're back to normal, some people with disabilities are facing more barriers, while some other people are experiencing new freedom, because they can get everything delivered to their home, they can work from home. They can speak with videoconferencing with others and becomes the way to socialize. It's open ways for them to see museum concerts and other things. And so there's some things all these good things we need to keep and all these barriers that we can remove. We need to remove when once it's time to remove them.

Tegan: The 2017 Canadian Survey on Disability reported that among employees with a disabilitiy aged 25 to 64 years, more than 1 in 3 needed at least one accommodation to be able to work. This represents just over 772,000 Canadians. The most common accommodations were flexible work arrangements, like working from home.

Perhaps the most obvious change in working conditions is the sudden accommodation many workers have received to work from home. Could you discuss some of the reactions, good or bad, that your respondents reported regarding the new arrangement, be it working from home or any other sort of new work situation?

Michelle: Well, working from home was definitely the most common work change that people talked about. More than half of our employed respondents transition to a full or partial work from home arrangement, and that change is definitely disruptive for people. But it's not all bad, right? Keeps you protected from being exposed to the virus and it allows people to actually keep working and keep having an income from a safer situation. And what's interesting here is this is actually an accommodation that people with disabilities have been asking about and pushing for a long period of time which a lot of workplaces weren't flexible about, so there's been some positive aspects related to this change from work from home and having this flexibility. Although there is still all that type of isolation that comes with it as well.

Workplace accommodations are a common accessibility request and have been for a long time. With the pandemic, many workplaces rushed to make it possible for all their employees to work from home. As of May 2020, 14% of businesses reported that 100% of their employees were teleworking or working from home. We spoke to Tony about all the unique opportunities and challenges brought on by telework.

Tony: As a manager, I find that there again, has been many opportunities that have arisen with this situation. I mean, we have some people that used to commute a long way from the office, they're saving that time, some of them even use part of the time to work more. Not that I want them to work too much. They're certainly more in good shape, they're less tired. If you haven't commuted for an hour and a half in the morning, an hour and a half, that is a benefit for everyone. It's more important for a person with a mobility issue, for example, that doesn't have to go on ice after freezing rain. But I think it's important for everyone in fact it's useful for the environment as well. So there's a benefit right there. There's some benefits for making sure that we can better share information among each other more fluidly. But there are some social aspects that we miss, I think we all miss some human connections, and we look forward to have at least an hybrid mode, where we will hopefully keep those benefits for accommodations at home and have access, again, to a common workplace for part of our time. And for certain specific activities, I can tell you that for strategic planning, or for some difficult discussions that we can we can need or even for reconciling data series. And I may be old, but I think it's much better in in person. Much more efficient. And we need to, to get back to this while keeping some of the benefits. Like I'm not walking up with an alarm clock for the majority of the mornings, except for when I have a meeting at 8 o'clock. And for me, that's a gift of life. I'm having lunch with my wife every day. And I've seen her more than ever in the last year. So that for me that there are several benefits for everyone. And obviously, there's benefits are there for people with activity limitation, they're actually more appreciated, probably by some people with activity limitations.

Tegan: If you think about it, even this interview is an accommodation. I was in my home, and he was in his, and yet here we are.

Tony: I feel I feel fascinated that only one year after social distancing and remote work and everything we can do this. I mean, I felt this... it illustrates how we can adapt with the right accommodation. We can bloom. It's actually an illustration of how we all were disabled immediately after the pandemic because of our systems, because of our environment, because of our culture. And now we suddenly--we're able to rally together and become a much more able organization that will be much more agile in the future.

Tegan: When we talk about accessibility or accommodation, we often think that it mostly benefits people with disabilities. But could you talk about how workplace accommodation benefits workers as a whole? I know this wasn't your particular place of study, but I think you probably would have something interesting to say about it.

Michelle: For sure, so things like accessibility, flexibility, accommodations are definitely so important. So they give people with disabilities the ability to work to engage in employment. And this is because they address the environmental barriers that can make disability limiting. So disability can bring certain physical and health limitations for people, but these limitations really only become barriers because of the ableist world we live in, where we organize work, we organize education in a way that focuses on certain assumptions about how people function, how peoples bodies work. So giving accommodations and allowing this more flexibility has been really important for bringing people with disabilities who want to work, who want to be part of employment into the workplace. And we can also think about this on a broader scale as well. So accessibility, flexibility, accommodations, they're important beyond disability. So these are things that give workers more autonomy in regard to when and how they work. They really acknowledge that this type of one size fits all approach to work hours and work situations, that doesn't work for everyone. We could be better workers. We can be more productive if we have this type of flexibility in work arrangements in terms of when and how we work, and this makes it good for employers. It's good for workers. It can reduce stress. It can make work easier and easier overall, but it can also increase productivity as well… So, there are these norms about work and these expectations of where we should work in, how we should be working that's still really influence things. This is where I think, though maybe this big change with this pandemic where we spent a year for many people working from home might change that, might give more accessibility, more flexibility for workers, which is good for everyone. But it's especially good for people with disabilities too.

Tegan: Focusing on accessibility instead of disability also means focusing on what individuals can do or could do if obstacles were removed. It helps people recognize a barrier as a source of disability. Thinking in terms of accessibility helps to broaden what it means to live with a disability.

Michelle: I think part of the problem is that we often think about disability as just being limiting. So it's related to an individual and that's why they can't get a job. But when we start to think about it a lot more, there's actually these big barriers that really matter. So if we think about the area of employment, there was a lot of discrimination that occurs in relation to disability. There's a lot of assumptions that we make about people with disabilities that simply aren't true.

Tegan: So how does using the term barrier rather than disability help people to better understand that accessibility benefits everyone?

Tony: That's a really good question. The barrier is often something that is not attached to the person itself. It's attached to the environment. And it's something we can change, we can reflect on how to make sure that it's removed. And once it's removed, the person can do, and you see more the ability than the disability. The disability is often caused by the barrier. Let's take my own example. I see in a way that makes me appreciate scenery or art or I take pictures and I see colors, I enjoy what I see, but I see much less than most human beings. And if all human beings would see like me, the environment would be different. Signs would be bigger, labels would be bigger, or we would have found accommodations for everyone so that we can all see equally and contribute equally. But sometimes I have a hard time seeing something, something I receive a document that is in PDF and it's not accessible. Well, if everybody would use the same color scheme that I do or the same elements of my, my workstation, we would all be working in the same way. And there are ways to make sure that this, these barriers don't exist, they're often simple. They're just not known because they're not needed by the majority. So, when you talk about the barrier, instead of disability, we can all work on it, we can all make sure it disappears and that someone like me can do my job as a director, I can fulfill my role as a father or I can even repair some things around the house because I found my own ways to do these things and we can all find our own ways, with the help of others sometimes or with our own perseverance other times and to contribute and lead a full life.

Tegan: how can broadening the definition of disability help more people accept that disability is everywhere and shouldn't be a taboo subject.

Tony: The more we open this definition but also the discussion, the more we are inclusive. I think the more that the level of knowledge will increase in society and hopefully the level of trust in the abilities. Because it's not about the disabilities it's about abilities that we need to look for.

Tegan: The Covid-19 pandemic has exposed the many ways that we can make the world more accessible, especially with remote work and other accommodations. But what will the post-pandemic world look like?

Tony: Well, hopefully, there will be people that will be, they will see that there's more openness, I've seen more openness in organization for sure. I've seen more needs in society as well. So more more openness and organization to provide accommodations to a larger number of people. We have added a number of employees that requested virtual ergonomic assessments or other accommodations, so that they would not self identify as a person with disability, but they certainly raise their hand saying that they needed accommodation, which I think is great. Because they will stay healthy and productive in the long run, you might end up avoiding more activity limitations, that's, that's fairly important. And I think we are speaking more in our workplace and in society about the needs of persons with disabilities, we have a lot of persons with disabilities that have low income, a lot of persons with disabilities that and suddenly more service than ever, from home, they can they are allowed to work from home or allowed to, they can easily order something and it will be delivered at their doorstep. I mean, that's opened a bunch of opportunities, but there's a lot of challenges also in our public space that some barriers have been raised. So the pandemic is an interesting situation and yeah, I hope people will be will self declare more and will express their needs more. And given the context we're in and given the fact that many including people with disabilities, traditionally asking for things but including also others that have never considered that they would need to discuss their their limitations. There are some certainly that there's more of that the public space for the for discussing these things openly. So I hope it stays I hope it's one thing that was will stay after that initial episodes that we've lived through in the recent year.

Tegan: You've been listening to Eh Sayers. A special thank you, big thank you, to our guests, Tony Labillois and Michelle Maroto.

You can learn more about Michelle's work by visiting her website or the website of the University of Alberta. The links are in the shownotes. You can also follow her on Twitter. Her handle is @MarotoMichelle.

The voices you heard at the top of the show were excerpts of stories from people with disabilities about their experiences during the pandemic. Thank you to all those who sent us their voices, and thank you to the Abilities Centre for their help in gathering them. You can subscribe to this show wherever you get your podcasts. There you can also find the French version of our show, called Hé-coutez bien! Thanks for listening! See you next time.

Statistics Canada thanks Canadians for their contribution to the 2021 Census

November 18, 2021 – Ottawa, ON – Statistics Canada

The collection phase of the 2021 Census of Population is now complete

Thanks to the commitment and cooperation of all Canadians, the 2021 Census collection was a great success.

"Participation across the country was simply outstanding," said Anil Arora, Chief Statistician of Canada. "The participation of Canadians from coast to coast to coast enabled us to achieve an overall collection response rate of 98 percent. Over 84.1 percent of questionnaires were completed online, exceeding our ambitious objective of 80 percent and establishing a new record for online response. Because of Canadians' contributions, Statistics Canada will be able to provide high-quality data to all levels of government, as well as businesses, researchers, non-governmental organizations and individual Canadians to make informed decisions that they can trust. Information from the 2021 Census will be particularly crucial to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and better plan for the future."

Now that the 2021 Census cycle is complete, the Agency is moving to implement the census data release plan. Statistics Canada is proud to present "Your census, your stories: Canada's portrait". The first major census release, for population and dwelling counts, is planned for February 9, 2022. The full data release schedule is available on the 2021 Census dissemination planning

Statistics Canada thanks Canadians for making the 2021 Census a success!

More information:
Media Relations, Statistics Canada
STATCAN.mediahotline-ligneinfomedias.STATCAN@canada.ca

Statement outlining results, risks and significant changes in operations, personnel and program

A) Introduction

Statistics Canada's mandate

Statistics Canada ("the agency") is a member of the Innovation, Science and Industry portfolio.

Statistics Canada's role is to ensure that Canadians have access to a trusted source of statistics on Canada that meets their highest priority needs.

The agency's mandate derives primarily from the Statistics Act. The Act requires that the agency collects, compiles, analyzes and publishes statistical information on the economic, social, and general conditions of the country and its people. It also requires that Statistics Canada conduct the census of population and the census of agriculture every fifth year, and protects the confidentiality of the information with which it is entrusted.

Statistics Canada also has a mandate to co-ordinate and lead the national statistical system. The agency is considered a leader, among statistical agencies around the world, in co–ordinating statistical activities to reduce duplication and reporting burden.

More information on Statistics Canada's mandate, roles, responsibilities and programs can be found in the 2021–2022 Main Estimates and in the Statistics Canada 2021–2022 Departmental Plan.

The Quarterly Financial Report:

  • should be read in conjunction with the 2021–2022 Main Estimates;
  • has been prepared by management, as required by Section 65.1 of the Financial Administration Act, and in the form and manner prescribed by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat;
  • has not been subject to an external audit or review.

Statistics Canada has the authority to collect and spend revenue from other federal government departments and agencies, as well as from external clients, for statistical services and products.

Basis of presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes the agency's spending authorities granted by Parliament and those used by the agency consistent with the Main Estimates for the 2021–2022 fiscal year. This quarterly report has been prepared using a special purpose financial reporting framework designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before moneys can be spent by the Government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authority for specific purposes.

The agency uses the full accrual method of accounting to prepare and present its annual departmental financial statements that are part of the departmental results reporting process. However, the spending authorities voted by Parliament remain on an expenditure basis.

B) Highlights of fiscal quarter and fiscal year-to-date results

This section highlights the significant items that contributed to the net increase in resources available for the year, as well as actual expenditures for the quarter ended September 30. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the department's supply in the previous fiscal year. Due to limited sessions in the Spring for Parliament to study supply, the agency did not receive the remainder of the full supply for the 2020-2021 Main Estimates, an additional $44.9 million, until December 2020. Therefore, the authorities available for use for 2021-2022 and 2020-2021 are not comparable.

Comparison of gross budgetary authorities and expenditures as of September 30, 2020, and September 30, 2021, in thousands of dollars
Description for Chart 1: Comparison of gross budgetary authorities and expenditures as of September 30, 2020, and September 30, 2021, in thousands of dollars

This bar graph shows Statistics Canada's budgetary authorities and expenditures, in thousands of dollars, as of September 30, 2020 and 2021:

  • As at September 30, 2020
    • Net budgetary authorities: $591,289
    • Vote netting authority: $120,000
    • Total authority: $711,289
    • Net expenditures for the period ending September 30: $320,562
    • Year-to-date revenues spent from vote netting authority for the period ending September 30: $12,727
    • Total expenditures: $333,289
  • As at September 30, 2021
    • Net budgetary authorities: $880,572
    • Vote netting authority: $120,000
    • Total authority: $1,000,572
    • Net expenditures for the period ending September 30: $560,849
    • Year-to-date revenues spent from vote netting authority for the period ending September 30: $33,338
    • Total expenditures: $594,187

Chart 1 outlines the gross budgetary authorities, which represent the resources available for use for the year as of September 30.

Significant changes to authorities

Total authorities available for 2021–2022 increased by $289.3 million, or 40.7%, from the previous year, from $711.3 million to $1,000.6 million (Chart 1). Of this increase, $44.9 million represents the remainder of the full supply received in December 2020 for the 2020-2021 Main Estimates. The remaining net increase of $244.4 million, or 32.3%, is mostly the result of the following:

  • An increase of $222.5 million for the 2021 Census of Population and Census of Agriculture programs for new cyclical funding received to cover operational activities;
  • An increase of $15.7 million in response to financial pressures on cost-recovery activities during the pandemic;
  • An increase of $9.5 million for collective bargaining;
  • A decrease of $11.0 million for various initiatives including Workload Migration, Enabling Vision for Data-Drive Economy and Society and the New Anti-Racism Strategy.

In addition to the appropriations allocated to the agency through the Main Estimates, Statistics Canada also has vote net authority within Vote 1, which entitles the agency to spend revenues collected from other federal government departments, agencies, and external clients to provide statistical services. The vote netting authority is stable at $120 million when comparing the second quarter of fiscal years 2020–2021 and 2021-2022.

Significant changes to expenditures

Year-to-date net expenditures recorded to the end of the second quarter increased by $240.2 million, or 74.9% from the previous year, from $320.6 million to $560.8 million (see Table A: Variation in Departmental Expenditures by Standard Object).

Statistics Canada spent approximately 63.7% of its authorities by the end of the second quarter, compared with 54.2% in the same quarter of 2020–2021.

Table A: Variation in Departmental Expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
This table displays the variance of departmental expenditures by standard object between fiscal 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The variance is calculated for year to date expenditures as at the end of the second quarter. The row headers provide information by standard object. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars and percentage variance for the year to date variation.
Departmental Expenditures Variation by Standard Object: Q2 year-to-date variation between fiscal year 2020–2021 and 2021–2022
$'000 %
(01) Personnel 69,762 23.7
(02) Transportation and communications 51,857 3,319.9
(03) Information 12,749 386.8
(04) Professional and special services 126,082 1,048.8
(05) Rentals 251 1.4
(06) Repair and maintenance 147 21.7
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies 352 143.7
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works -93 -100
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment -227 -7.8
(10) Transfer payments - N/A
(12) Other subsidies and payments 18 3.3
Total gross budgetary expenditures 260,898 78.3
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues 20,611 161.9
Total net budgetary expenditures 240,287 74.9
Note: Explanations are provided for variances of more than $1 million.

Personnel: There is an overall increase in the agency's activities as the 2021 Census is in its main operational period this quarter. The increase is also attributable to additional workload required for efforts related to supporting the response to the pandemic and the migration to the cloud. Furthermore, it reflects recently ratified collective agreements, as well as additional compensation secured in response to settlements negotiated for issues related to the Phoenix payroll system.

Transportation and communications: The increase is mainly due to postage costs for the mailing of Census questionnaires and related materials, as well as travel expenditures for enumerators for 2021 Census collection activity occurring this fiscal year.

Information: The increase is mainly due to advertisement cost for the 2021 Census operations and to printing costs for the 2021 Census materials such as questionnaires, envelopes, and letters.

Professional and special services: The increase is mainly due to the remuneration of Statistics Act employees hired to conduct the 2021 Census.

Revenues: The increase is mainly due to the closing of regional offices and a delay in recording cost recovery activities related to Census during the beginning of the pandemic last fiscal year.

C) Risks and uncertainties

Statistics Canada is currently expending significant effort in modernizing its business processes and tools, in order to maintain its relevance and maximize the value it provides to Canadians. As a foundation piece for some of these efforts, the agency is working in collaboration with Shared Services Canada and Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Office of the Chief Information Officer, to ensure the agency has access to adequate information technology services and support to attain its modernization objectives and successfully transition its infrastructure and applications to the cloud. Activities and related costs are projected based on various assumptions that can change, depending on the nature and degree of work required to accomplish the initiatives. Risks and uncertainties are being mitigated by the agency's strong financial planning management practices and integrated strategic planning framework.

D) Significant changes to operations, personnel and programs

The agency is managing changes in operations and program activities with financial implications including:

  • The Census program is in its advanced implementation stage for the 2021 Census. As such, expenditures for this program are increasing significantly. Statistics Canada is undertaking major activities this fiscal year that are critical to the success of the 2021 Census of Population. These activities include hiring field staff, collecting data, follow-up with respondents, processing of returns, developing and testing dissemination systems and processes, and starting data quality and evaluation studies. These activities culminate in the first of the Census data releases, the Population and Dwelling Counts, in February 2022;
  • New efforts and collaboration to provide data and insights related to the impact of the pandemic on the society and economy;
  • Budget 2021 announced funding for new initiatives including Disaggregated Data Action Plan, Justice Data Modernization, Quality of Life Framework for Canada, and the Health Care Access, Experiences and Related Outcomes Statistical Program, as well as Census of Environment. Expenditures related to these new initiatives will ramp up throughout the fiscal year.

Approval by senior officials

Approved by:

Anil Arora, Chief Statistician
Monia Lahaie, Chief Financial Officer
Ottawa, Ontario
Signed on: November 26, 2021

Appendix

Statement of Authorities (unaudited)
Table summary: This table displays the departmental authorities for fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The row headers provide information by type of authority, Vote 105 – Net operating expenditures, Statutory authority and Total Budgetary authorities. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for Total available for use for the year ending March 31; used during the quarter ended June 30; and year to date used at quarter-end of both fiscal years.
  Fiscal year 2021–2022 Fiscal year 2020–2021
Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2022Tablenote 1 Used during the quarter ended September 30, 2021 Year-to-date used at quarter-end Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2021Tablenote 1 Used during the quarter ended September 30, 2020 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Vote 1 — Net operating expenditures 794,138 242,754 520,295 515,210 144,146 282,522
Statutory authority — Contribution to employee benefit plans 86,434 20,277 40,554 76,079 19,020 38,040
Total budgetary authorities 880,572 263,031 560,849 591,289 163,166 320,562
Tablenote 1

Includes only Authorities available for use and granted by Parliament at quarter-end.

Return to tablenote 1 referrer

Departmental budgetary expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
Table summary: This table displays the departmental expenditures by standard object for fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The row headers provide information by standard object for expenditures and revenues. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for planned expenditures for the year ending March 31; expended during the quarter ended September 30; and year to date used at quarter-end of both fiscal years.
  Fiscal year 2021–2022 Fiscal year 2020–2021
Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2022 Expended during the quarter ended September 30, 2021 Year-to-date used at quarter-end Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2021 Expended during the quarter ended September 30, 2020 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Expenditures:
(01) Personnel 663,309 186,653 363,888 571,289 150,469 294,126
(02) Transportation and communications 72,692 18,122 53,419 22,460 1,375 1,562
(03) Information 27,902 11,290 16,045 24,913 2,063 3,296
(04) Professional and special services 205,167 62,863 138,104 57,029 6,568 12,022
(05) Rentals 18,503 9,062 18,041 13,357 8,550 17,790
(06) Repair and maintenance 779 734 823 881 29 676
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies 1,922 377 597 2,119 157 245
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works 756 - - 671 84 93
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment 9,485 1,162 2,702 18,429 748 2,929
(10) Transfer payments - - - 100 - -
(12) Other subsidies and payments 57 438 568 41 166 550
Total gross budgetary expenditures 1,000,572 290,701 594,187 711,289 170,209 333,289
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues 120,000 27,670 33,338 120,000 7,043 12,727
Total revenues netted against expenditures 120,000 27,670 33,338 120,000 7,043 12,727
Total net budgetary expenditures 880,572 263,031 560,849 591,289 163,166 320,562

Retail Trade Survey (Monthly): CVs for total sales by geography – September 2021

CVs for Total sales by geography
This table displays the results of Retail Trade Survey (monthly): CVs for total sales by geography – September 2021. The information is grouped by Geography (appearing as row headers), Month and Percent (appearing as column headers)
Geography Month
202109
%
Canada 0.7
Newfoundland and Labrador 1.3
Prince Edward Island 0.8
Nova Scotia 1.7
New Brunswick 2.1
Quebec 1.6
Ontario 1.5
Manitoba 2.2
Saskatchewan 2.3
Alberta 1.2
British Columbia 1.0
Yukon Territory 1.6
Northwest Territories 0.5
Nunavut 3.2