Visitor Travel Survey: C.V.s for Total Spending Estimates - VTS Q3 2019

Visitor Travel Survey: C.V.s for Total Spending Estimates - VTS Q3 2019
Province/Territory of Entry United States Overseas
Total Spending
($ 000,000)
Spending C.V.
(%)
Total Spending
($ 000,000)
Spending C.V.
(%)
Newfoundland and Labrador 12.4 22.7 6.6 69.2
Prince Edward Island 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Nova Scotia 75.4 11.7 94.5 17.3
New Brunswick 200.5 11.3 16.5 71.0
Quebec 647.3 4.9 823.2 5.2
Ontario 1,869.9 4.0 1,720.1 5.3
Manitoba 55.3 14.6 21.8 31.4
Saskatchewan 24.5 16.1 6.6 38.9
Alberta 309.1 6.9 200.5 8.2
British Columbia 1,336.7 3.7 1,805.5 4.8
Yukon 54.2 14.5 2.8 93.4
Canada 4,585.3 2.2 4,698.3 2.9

National Travel Survey: Response Rate at the estimation stage - Q3 2019

Visitor Travel Survey: C.V.s for Total Spending Estimates - VTS Q3 2019
Table summary
This table displays the results of Response Rate at the estimation stage. The information is grouped by Province of residence (appearing as row headers), Unweighted and Weighted (appearing as column headers), calculated using percentage unit of measure (appearing as column headers).
Province of residence Unweighted Weighted
Percentage
Newfoundland and Labrador 7.8 7.5
Prince Edward Island 5.9 6.0
Nova Scotia 14.0 13.9
New Brunswick 12.4 12.5
Quebec 19.4 18.0
Ontario 21.8 20.8
Manitoba 13.6 13.0
Saskatchewan 12.7 12.1
Alberta 16.0 15.6
British Columbia 18.4 17.9
Canada 15.4 17.9

Video - Visualizing Vector Data (Part 1): Symbology Styles

Catalogue number: Catalogue number: 89200005

Issue number: 2020009

Release date: February 25, 2020

QGIS Demo 9

Visualizing Vector Data (Part 1) – Symbology Styles - Video transcript

(The Statistics Canada symbol and Canada wordmark appear on screen with the title: "Visualizing Vector Data (Part 1) – Symbology Styles")

So now that we know how to edit the attributes and geometries of vector data, a complementary skill is using their fields for visualization. As we briefly introduced, these parameters can be set in the Layer Properties box. Today we'll focus on the Symbology tab learning:

The available styles and their application to different field types.

Then in a follow up video we'll show how to use rule-based visualizations, save and load created symbology files, and apply labelling schemes.

Before beginning let's discuss some considerations for visualization.

First - Are there established conventions for symbolizing the specific features in a layer? If there are multiple conventions - which is best aligned with the geographic location being visualized.

Second - Have you selected logical colour schemes for specific features?

Third - What is the appropriate style based on the field type.

And some additional factors that influence interpretability, such as:

  • Enhancing the contrast between different features
  • The number of features and level of detail relative to the scale to avoid creating overcrowded or oversimplified visualizations.

The simplest symbology edits can be done by right-clicking the layer, expanding Style and dragging on the colour wheel to change the colour. Using the white circle we can alter the specific hue and brightness. This is already an improvement for this layer, being immediately decipherable as water features.

Now lets explore the Single Symbol style, the default in QGIS, where a single colour is applied to all features - using the boundary layers. Specifically, we'll alter the styles to visualize both boundary levels simultaneously.

So opening the Layer Properties Box, in the Symbology tab, we can change the colour or transparency of the entire layer, as done with the hydrology layer, using these tabs. However, we want to change only the transparency of the Fill Color retaining the boundary outlines, so we'll click on Simple Fill and then Fill Colour. We can use the sliders on the right or the interactive selections in the various tabs to set the applied colour. For our purpose we will set the opacity to 0, making our layer fully transparent. We can use Apply to verify we're satisfied with the visualization and OK to finalize.

Now we'll repeat with the Census Division layer, going to Simple Fill and changing the outline width to 0.86 and then clicking on the colour – we'll alter it to Red to distinguish them from the subdivision boundaries. As seen in the Canvas, we can now visualize both boundaries simultaneously.

Alternatively we could have applied a categorized symbology, which enables us to symbolize discrete features, classes or categories within a specified field - selected in the Column drop-down. Using the Provincial Unique Identifier we can click Classify and Apply. So now each subdivision is coloured according to its province. We could switch this out for another categorical variable, like Census Division Names, hitting Classify – Yes and OK. So this offers an alternative means to visualize both boundary levels.

But due to the random colour ramp there are two issues:

  • The first being adjacent features may be assigned similar colours, complicating their distinction.
  • And the second, the applied colours may not enhance contrast between features or be aesthetically pleasing to interpret.

So we'll use some colour presets within the Symbology tab and the Topological Coloring tool in the Processing Toolbox to address these issues. The topological colouring tool is explicitly meant for symbolizing boundaries, and will ensure adjacent features are not assigned the same colour.

Within the tool we'll specify the Input layer, the number of colours to use and the Mode which determines how colours are assigned – and are explained in the tool description on the right. We’ll use Assigned Area, helpful given variations in the size of features in divisions and even more pertinent for the subdivision layer.

The tool outputs a new layer with the exact same properties as the input, except with one new field called “color id” which we can use for visualization. Selecting it from the drop-down, we will now expand Colour Ramp drop-down beside and select Create New. Here are a variety of presets available for symbolizing a layer. Today we'll use the Catalog: ColorBrewer.

So first we'll match the number of colours to that specified in the tool, and then we can select a colour scheme including palettes and ramps, to use - in this case Pastel1. Then click OK. and in the Symbology tab, click Classify and OK. Now adjacent features are distinctly coloured and the overall visualization is much easier to interpret.

Now lets explore graduated symbologies using the grain elevators layer. Graduated styles can be used to visualize concentrations, magnitudes or frequencies of a variable with a specific colour ramp – like vehicle collisions, earthquakkes and population sizes. The style is restricted to numeric field types. So we'll use the Capacity_Tonne field.

The Mode determines the method used to establish value ranges or “break values” used in visualization. So we can use Pretty Breaks which defaults to easily interpreted value ranges. The Precision parameter determines the number of decimal places in the Legend Values and we can alter the Classes value in the bottom right corner to change the number of value ranges used in visualization. Clicking Apply and looking in the Canvas , nearly all elevators are coloured white, with select elevators on the coasts being red. This is because there are many more primary and process elevators with smaller capacities than there are export elevators, with much larger storage.

In the Histogram tab, we can click Load Values to assess the distribution of data and value ranges, which informs the most appropriate Mode to apply. So here, given that most features are in the first value range, we'd want to apply a different mode, in this case a Quantile (Equal Count), so that an equal number of features are in each value range.

We still want to edit the Value ranges to be more intuitive, double-clicking and entering the new values which should also update the Legend values. So we'll alter to 5000 and 50000. We'll also alter the Legend values for the Upper and Lower bounds switching to greater than 50000 and less than 5000. Clicking apply and looking in the Canvas there is a much better distribuiton of colour across the features, reaffirmed back in the Histogram tab – where features are more evenly distributed across the value ranges.

For point and line geometries we can also alter the size of symbols between ranges to enhance visualization. So let's increase the size of the point symbol by 0.5 for each value range. Click Apply and OK. So as seen in the Map Canvas this offers a visualization of the differing storage capacities between individual elevators.

There are three additional symbology styles for point geometries. We can apply a Point Cluster symbology, and within the Render Settings - see our Graduated symbology style is still applied. The cluster style will provide a dynamic count of features based on the scale of the Canvas and specified Distance – determining the radius for clustering. As we can see zooming out – the counts of clustered features becomes larger and zooming in – we can begin to see individual features.

The Point Displacement symbology is effectively the same as Cluster, but depicts the individual features displayed in a particular geometry around the Cluster . Additionally features can be labelled using a specified field, here using the Capacity Tonne field. As shown, this style is not the best for detailed datasets or coarser scales, but is suitable when the features are sparser or the Canvas is at a finer scale enabling the properties and attributes of individual features to be distinguished within the Cluster.

The final style is the Heat Map, which will create a dynamic, raster style interpolation according to the spatial distribution of points. So lets switch the colour ramp to Red-Yellow-Greens and reexpand the drop-down to Invert the Colour Ramp. Additionally we can weight the visualization by a numeric field. We'll use the Capacity Tonne field as the Weight parameter – clicking Apply and OK. Zooming in and out we have a dynamic visualization of storage capacity that changes with scale. Now perhaps we want to alter the colour ramp, because in this case the green areas effectively mean zero storage capacity. Rather than expanding the drop-down click the Colour Ramp itself. Now we can edit the colour gradient relative to the value ranges or change the Transparency for only one colour by clicking on the stop and altering the Opacity slider.

Back in the Canvas we can now see the underlying boundaries along with our heat map. Finally we'll Save the Project File As, giving it a name – calling it VectorVisualization, so that we can use it in our follow up video, where we'll cover rule-based symbologies, and labelling schemes.

(The words: "For comments or questions about this video, GIS tools or other Statistics Canada products or services, please contact us: statcan.sisagrequestssrsrequetesag.statcan@canada.ca" appear on screen.)

(Canada wordmark appears.)

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures, Q3 2019

C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures, Q3 2019 in Thousands of Dollars (x 1,000)
Table summary
This table displays the results of C.V.s for Visit-Expenditures by Duration of Visit, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Expenditures. The information is grouped by Duration of trip (appearing as row headers), Main Trip Purpose, Country or Region of Expenditures (Total, Canada, United States, Overseas) calculated using Visit-Expenditures in Thousands of Dollars (x 1,000) and c.v. as units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Duration of Visit Main Trip Purpose Country or Region of Expenditures
Total Canada United States Overseas
$ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V. $ '000 C.V.
Total Duration Total Main Trip Purpose 27,521,742 A 17,683,076 A 4,839,752 B 4,998,914 B
Holiday, leisure or recreation 16,327,462 A 9,824,816 A 3,365,144 B 3,137,502 B
Visit friends or relatives 6,477,084 A 4,585,518 A 613,497 B 1,278,069 C
Personal conference, convention or trade show 357,441 B 247,563 C 95,198 D 14,680 E
Shopping, non-routine 763,620 B 616,190 B 147,430 C ..  
Other personal reasons 1,221,365 B 888,535 B 183,224 E 149,606 E
Business conference, convention or trade show 926,902 B 546,367 B 247,906 C 132,629 D
Other business 1,447,868 B 974,087 B 187,353 C 286,428 E
Same-Day Total Main Trip Purpose 5,013,925 A 4,614,295 A 347,927 B 51,703 E
Holiday, leisure or recreation 2,335,908 B 2,124,745 B 159,461 C 51,703 E
Visit friends or relatives 1,255,164 B 1,198,787 B 56,377 D ..  
Personal conference, convention or trade show 66,346 C 63,112 C 3,234 E ..  
Shopping, non-routine 624,822 B 521,532 B 103,291 C ..  
Other personal reasons 322,718 B 315,858 B 6,860 E ..  
Business conference, convention or trade show 71,933 D 61,464 D 10,469 E ..  
Other business 337,033 C 328,797 C 8,235 E ..  
Overnight Total Main Trip Purpose 22,507,816 A 13,068,781 A 4,491,825 B 4,947,211 B
Holiday, leisure or recreation 13,991,554 A 7,700,072 A 3,205,683 B 3,085,799 B
Visit friends or relatives 5,221,920 B 3,386,731 A 557,120 B 1,278,069 C
Personal conference, convention or trade show 291,095 C 184,451 C 91,964 D 14,680 E
Shopping, non-routine 138,797 C 94,658 C 44,139 D ..  
Other personal reasons 898,647 B 572,677 B 176,364 E 149,606 E
Business conference, convention or trade show 854,969 B 484,903 B 237,437 C 132,629 D
Other business 1,110,835 B 645,289 B 179,118 C 286,428 E
..
data not available

Estimates contained in this table have been assigned a letter to indicate their coefficient of variation (c.v.) (expressed as a percentage). The letter grades represent the following coefficients of variation:

A
c.v. between or equal to 0.00% and 5.00% and means Excellent.
B
c.v. between or equal to 5.01% and 15.00% and means Very good.
C
c.v. between or equal to 15.01% and 25.00% and means Good.
D
c.v. between or equal to 25.01% and 35.00% and means Acceptable.
E
c.v. greater than 35.00% and means Use with caution.

National Travel Survey: C.V.s for Person-Trips by Duration of Trip, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Trip Destination, Q3 2019

C.V.s for Person-Trips by Duration of Trip, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Trip Q3 2019
Table summary
This table displays the results of C.V.s for Person-Trips by Duration of Trip, Main Trip Purpose and Country or Region of Trip Destination. The information is grouped by Duration of trip (appearing as row headers), Main Trip Purpose, Country or Region of Trip Destination (Total, Canada, United States, Overseas) calculated using Person-Trips in Thousands (× 1,000) and C.V. as a units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Duration of Trip Main Trip Purpose Country or Region of Trip Destination
Total Canada United States Overseas
Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V. Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V. Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V. Person-Trips (x 1,000) C.V.
Total Duration Total Main Trip Purpose 101,520 A 91,523 A 7,514 A 2,482 A
Holiday, leisure or recreation 46,551 A 41,114 A 4,055 A 1,382 B
Visit friends or relatives 36,220 A 33,848 A 1,558 B 814 B
Personal conference, convention or trade show 1,683 C 1,505 C 158 C 21 E
Shopping, non-routine 5,060 B 4,136 B 924 B ..  
Other personal reasons 5,827 B 5,440 B 314 D 73 D
Business conference, convention or trade show 1,713 B 1,370 B 279 D 65 D
Other business 4,465 B 4,111 B 227 C 127 D
Same-Day Total Main Trip Purpose 59,108 A 55,946 A 3,161 B ..  
Holiday, leisure or recreation 24,199 A 22,851 A 1,348 B ..  
Visit friends or relatives 21,064 A 20,490 A 574 C ..  
Personal conference, convention or trade show 1,040 C 1,016 C 24 E ..  
Shopping, non-routine 4,688 B 3,845 B 844 C ..  
Other personal reasons 4,254 B 4,030 B 224 E ..  
Business conference, convention or trade show 719 C 640 C 79 E ..  
Other business 3,143 B 3,075 B 68 E ..  
Overnight Total Main Trip Purpose 42,412 A 35,577 A 4,353 A 2,482 A
Holiday, leisure or recreation 22,352 A 18,263 A 2,707 A 1,382 B
Visit friends or relatives 15,156 A 13,358 A 983 B 814 B
Personal conference, convention or trade show 643 C 489 C 134 C 21 E
Shopping, non-routine 371 C 292 C 80 D ..  
Other personal reasons 1,573 B 1,410 B 90 D 73 D
Business conference, convention or trade show 994 B 730 B 200 C 65 D
Other business 1,322 B 1,036 B 159 C 127 D
..
data not available

Estimates contained in this table have been assigned a letter to indicate their coefficient of variation (c.v.) (expressed as a percentage). The letter grades represent the following coefficients of variation:

A
c.v. between or equal to 0.00% and 5.00% and means Excellent.
B
c.v. between or equal to 5.01% and 15.00% and means Very good.
C
c.v. between or equal to 15.01% and 25.00% and means Good.
D
c.v. between or equal to 25.01% and 35.00% and means Acceptable.
E
c.v. greater than 35.00% and means Use with caution.

Quarterly Survey of Financial Statements (QSFS): Weighted Asset Response Rate - Q4 2018 to Q4 2019

Weighted Asset Response Rate
Table summary
This table displays the results of Weighted Asset Response Rate. The information is grouped by Release date (appearing as row headers), 2018 Q3 and Q4, and 2019 Q1, Q2 and Q3 calculated using percentage units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Release date 2018 2019
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarterly (percentage)
February 25, 2020 83.5 85.2 81.9 75.4 62.4
November 26, 2019 83.5 84.6 80.1 64.9 ..
August 23, 2019 83.5 81.9 65.2 .. ..
May 24, 2019 83.5 67.5 .. .. ..
February 26, 2019 60.0 .. .. .. ..
.. not available for a specific reference period
Source: Quarterly Survey of Financial Statements (2501)

Security Video Surveillance in Statistics Canada’s Secure Access Points - Privacy impact assessment summary

Introduction

Statistics Canada is modernizing its methods of data access to improve its service to users of Statistics Canada data. The goal of modernization is to fully realize the potential of the data holdings created for the public good and increase collaboration and partnerships between data users and providers while ensuring that all data assets are protected against unauthorized use and disclosure.

Objective

This privacy impact assessment identifies and explores privacy, confidentiality and security issues associated with the use of video surveillance monitoring (camera monitoring) in secure facilities designed for the purposes of data access and makes recommendations for issue resolution or mitigation.

Description

Statistics Canada is planning on expanding controlled access to anonymized microdata for statistical research projects, by establishing Secure Access Points on the premises of federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal governments, universities, and other organizations. Each Secure Access Point is a secure Statistics Canada facility that meets Statistics Canada's departmental security standards for data access, including controlled access monitoring. Any data stored on these premises remain under the care and control of Statistics Canada and subject to the confidentiality provisions of the Statistics Act.

In each Secure Access Point, video surveillance cameras will be used to monitor activity and access. Only Statistics Canada employees and deemed employees (individuals providing statistical services to Statistics Canada under contract or written arrangement) will have access to the microdata within Secure Access Points.

Statistics Canada's use of the camera monitoring includes making recordings of activities in the secure designated room to offer enhanced protection of employees and assets.

Risk Area Identification and Categorization

The PIA also identifies the risk areas and categorizes the level of potential risk (level 1 representing the lowest level of potential risk and level 4, the highest) associated with the collection and use of personal information of employees.

  • Type of program or activity – Level 2: Administration of program or activity and services.
  • Type of personal information involved and context – Level 1: Only personal information, with no contextual sensitivities, collected directly from the individual or provided with the consent of the individual for disclosure under an authorized program.
  • Program or activity partners and private sector involvement – Level 3: With other institutions or a combination of federal, provincial or territorial, and municipal governments.
  • Duration of the program or activity – Level 3: Long-term (ongoing) program.
  • Program population – Level 1: The program's use of personal information for internal administrative purposes affects certain employees (or deemed employees).
  • Personal information transmission – Level 3: The personal information is transferred to a portable device (i.e., USB key, diskette, laptop computer), transferred to a different medium or is printed.
  • Technology and privacy: The new project involves the implementation of a new electronic system to support the program but does not involve the implementation of new technologies.
  • Privacy breach: There is a very low risk of a breach of some of the personal information being disclosed:
    a) The impact on the employee would be minimal as it would only divulge a digital recording of the individual taken in the Secure Access Point.
    b) The impact on the institution would be minimal due to the low sensitivity of the information.

Conclusion

This assessment concludes that, with the existing Statistics Canada safeguards, any remaining risks are either negligible or are such that Statistics Canada is prepared to accept and manage the risk.

Annual Non-Store Retail Survey: CVs for operating revenue - 2018

Annual Non-store Retail Survey - CVs for operating revenue - 2017
Geography CVs for operating revenue
percent
Canada 0.74
Newfoundland and Labrador 0.10
Prince Edward Island 0.03
Nova Scotia 0.38
New Brunswick 0.36
Quebec 1.05
Ontario 1.45
Manitoba 0.63
Saskatchewan 0.81
Alberta 0.42
British Columbia 0.38
Yukon 0.00
Northwest Territories 0.00
Nunavut 0.00

Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2019

Statement outlining results, risks and significant changes in operations, personnel and program

A) Introduction

Statistics Canada's mandate

Statistics Canada ("the agency") is a member of the Innovation, Science and Industry portfolio.

Statistics Canada's role is to ensure that Canadians have access to a trusted source of statistics on Canada that meets their highest priority needs.

The agency's mandate derives primarily from the Statistics Act. The Act requires that the agency collect, compile, analyze and publish statistical information on the economic, social, and general conditions of the country and its people. It also requires that Statistics Canada conduct the census of population and the census of agriculture every fifth year, and that it protect the confidentiality of the information with which it is entrusted.

Statistics Canada also has a mandate to co-ordinate and lead the national statistical system. The agency is considered a leader, among statistical agencies around the world, in co–ordinating statistical activities to reduce duplication and reporting burden.

More information on Statistics Canada's mandate, roles, responsibilities and programs can be found in the 2019–2020 Main Estimates and in the Statistics Canada 2019–2020 Departmental Plan.

The Quarterly Financial Report:

  • should be read in conjunction with the 2019–2020 Main Estimates;
  • has been prepared by management, as required by Section 65.1 of the Financial Administration Act, and in the form and manner prescribed by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat;
  • has not been subject to an external audit or review.

Statistics Canada has the authority to collect and spend revenue from other federal government departments and agencies, as well as from external clients, for statistical services and products.

Basis of presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes the agency's spending authorities granted by Parliament and those used by the agency consistent with the Main Estimates for the 2019–2020 fiscal year. This quarterly report has been prepared using a special purpose financial reporting framework designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before moneys can be spent by the Government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authority for specific purposes.

The agency uses the full accrual method of accounting to prepare and present its annual departmental financial statements that are part of the departmental results reporting process. However, the spending authorities voted by Parliament remain on an expenditure basis.

B) Highlights of fiscal quarter and fiscal year-to-date results

This section highlights the significant items that contributed to the net increase in resources available for the year, as well as actual expenditures for the quarter ended December 31.

Comparison of gross budgetary authorities and expenditures as of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2019, in thousands of dollars
Description for Chart 1: Comparison of gross budgetary authorities and expenditures as of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2019, in thousands of dollars

This bar graph shows Statistics Canada's budgetary authorities and expenditures, in thousands of dollars, as of December 31, 2018 and 2019:

  • As at December 31, 2018
    • Net budgetary authorities: $524,082
    • Vote netting authority: $120,000
    • Total authority: $644,082
    • Net expenditures for the period ending December 31: $390,990
    • Year-to-date revenues spent from vote netting authority for the period ending December 31: $60,963
    • Total expenditures: $451,953
  • As at December 31, 2019
    • Net budgetary authorities: $562,031
    • Vote netting authority: $120,000
    • Total authority: $682,031
    • Net expenditures for the period ending December 31: $426,482
    • Year-to-date revenues spent from vote netting authority for the period ending December 31: $59,228
    • Total expenditures: $485,710

Chart 1 outlines the gross budgetary authorities, which represent the resources available for use for the year as of December 31.

Significant changes to authorities

Total authorities available for 2019–2020 have increased by $37.9 million, or 5.9%, from the previous year, from $644.1 million to $682.0 million (Chart 1). This net increase is mostly the result of the following:

  • An increase of $22.4 million for the 2021 Census of Population program and $3.8 million for the 2021 Census of Agriculture program for new cyclical funding received to cover planning and developmental activities;
  • An increase of $13.0 million for negotiated salary adjustments;
  • An increase of $11.7 million for Renewing and Modernizing Statistics Canada, an initiative approved in 2018–2019 which will change the way the federal government collects, uses and shares data while ensuring the privacy of Canadians remains protected;
  • An increase of $6.3 million for Workload Migration, an initiative approved in 2018–2019 which will migrate the information technology infrastructure and applications to the Cloud;
  • An increase of $3.2 million for the Survey of Financial Security and Annual Household Wealth Tables;
  • A decrease of $9.8 million for the Statistical Survey Operations pay equity settlement, marking the near completion of the pay equity settlement;
  • A decrease of $6.2 million for the 2016 Census of Population program and $2.2 million for the 2016 Census of Agriculture program due to the cyclical nature of funding that is winding down;
  • A decrease of $4.2 million for the reimbursement of eligible paylist expenditures.

The variance is also explained by the reception of authorities at different quarters throughout the year.

In addition to the appropriations allocated to the agency through the Main Estimates, Statistics Canada also has vote net authority within Vote 1, which entitles the agency to spend revenues collected from other federal government departments, agencies, and external clients to provide statistical services. The vote netting authority is stable at $120 million when comparing the third quarter of fiscal years 2018–2019 and 2019–2020.

Significant changes to expenditures

Year-to-date net expenditures recorded to the end of the third quarter increased by $35.5 million, or 9.1% from the previous year, from $391.0 million to $426.5 million (see Table A: Variation in Departmental Expenditures by Standard Object).

Statistics Canada spent approximately 75.9% of its authorities by the end of the third quarter, compared with 74.6% in the same quarter of 2018–2019.

Table A: Variation in Departmental Expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
Table summary: This table displays the variance of departmental expenditures by standard object between fiscal 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. The variance is calculated for year to date expenditures as at the end of the third quarter. The row headers provide information by standard object. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars and percentage variance for the year to date variation.
Departmental Expenditures Variation by Standard Object: Q3 year-to-date variation between fiscal year 2018–2019 and 2019–2020
$'000 %
(01) Personnel 31,546 7.9
(02) Transportation and communications 400 3.7
(03) Information 727 16.7
(04) Professional and special services -307 -1.6
(05) Rentals 4,976 47.4
(06) Repair and maintenance 315 137.0
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies -172 -21.8
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works -468 -87.0
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment 1,059 47.8
(10) Transfer payments -   -
(12) Other subsidies and payments -4,319 -94.0
Total gross budgetary expenditures 33,757 7.5
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues -1,735 -2.9
Total net budgetary expenditures 35,492 9.1
Note: Explanations are provided for variances of more than $1 million.

Personnel: The increase is mainly due to the ratification of collective agreements, retroactive salary payments and an overall increase in the agency's activities.

Rentals: The increase is mainly due to timing differences in the payment of various software licences and maintenance fees, new annual software renewal costs, and a fee for the use of additional software licences.

Acquisition of machinery and equipment: The increase is mainly due to the purchase of telecommunication equipment and furniture, as well as interviewer collection tablets.

Other subsidies and payments: The decrease is mainly due to the majority of non-salary payments related to the Statistical Survey Operations pay equity settlement having been paid last fiscal year.

Revenues: The decrease is primarily the result of timing differences in the receipt of funds for scheduled key deliverables.

The variance is also explained by timing differences of payments in this period compared to last fiscal year.

C) Risks and uncertainties

Statistics Canada is currently expending significant effort in modernizing its business processes and tools, in order to maintain its relevance and maximize the value it provides to Canadians. As a foundation piece for some of these efforts, the agency is working in collaboration with Shared Services Canada and Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Office of the Chief Information Officer, to ensure the agency has access to adequate information technology services and support to attain its modernization objectives and successfully transition its infrastructure and applications to the cloud. Activities and related costs are projected based on various assumptions that can change, depending on the nature and degree of work required to accomplish the initiatives. Risks and uncertainties are being mitigated by the agency's strong financial planning management practices and business architecture.

D) Significant changes to operations, personnel and programs

There was an important reorganization at the agency, where two new fields, Strategic Engagement and Communications Field and the Digital Solutions Field have been created. This reorganization will help the agency better meet data user needs and expectations, augment efficiencies, enhance integration between subject matters, and increase our value as a world-leading National Statistical Organization. These changes are significant, and will be approached with a phased implementation strategy.

Other minor changes in program activities with financial implications include:

  • The Census program is ramping down operations from the 2016 Census while ramping up for the 2021 Census which is in the advanced planning and testing phase. As such, expenditures for this program are increasing.
  • New initiatives announced in the Budget 2018 are ramping up and activities related to those initiatives are on track.

Approval by senior officials

Approved by:

Anil Arora, Chief Statistician
Kathleen Mitchell, Acting Chief Financial Officer
Ottawa, Ontario
Signed on: February 26, 2020

Appendix

Statement of Authorities (unaudited)
Table summary: This table displays the departmental expenditures by standard object for the fiscal year 2019-2020. The row headers provide information by standard object for expenditures and revenues. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for planned expenditures for the year ending March 31; expended during the quarter ended December 31; and year to date used at quarter-end 2019-2020.
  Fiscal year 2019–2020 Fiscal year 2018–2019
Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2020Tablenote 1 Used during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 Year-to-date used at quarter-end Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2019Tablenote 1 Used during the quarter ended December 31, 2018 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Vote 1 — Net operating expenditures 489,280 127,985 372,887 453,837 104,847 343,869
Statutory authority — Contribution to employee benefit plans 72,751 17,865 53,595 70,245 15,707  47,121
Total budgetary authorities 562,031 145,850 426,482  524,082 120,554 390,990
Tablenote 1

Includes only Authorities available for use and granted by Parliament at quarter-end.

Return to tablenote 1 referrer

Departmental Budgetary Expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
Table summary: This table displays the departmental expenditures by standard object for the fiscal year 2018-2019. The row headers provide information by standard object for expenditures and revenues. The column headers provide information in thousands of dollars for planned expenditures for the year ending March 31; expended during the quarter ended December 31; and year to date used at quarter-end 2018-2019.
  Fiscal year 2019–2020 Fiscal year 2018–2019
Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2020 Expended during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 Year-to-date used at quarter-end Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2019 Expended during the quarter ended December 31, 2018 Year-to-date used at quarter-end
in thousands of dollars
Expenditures:
(01) Personnel 574,658 154,217 429,761 527,128 137,111 398,215
(02) Transportation and communications 18,881 4,450 11,347 21,798 4,692 10,947
(03) Information 9,161 1,070 5,088 10,911 1,782 4,361
(04) Professional and special services 43,048 6,205 19,251 36,128 9,314 19,558
(05) Rentals 12,998 4,248 15,481 15,325 865 10,505
(06) Repair and maintenance 678 306 545 1,601 65 230
(07) Utilities, materials and supplies 4,072 321 617 3,333 323 789
(08) Acquisition of land, buildings and works 625 67 70 223 392 538
(09) Acquisition of machinery and equipment 14,085 2,118 3,274 13,692 -1,647 2,215
(10) Transfer payments 100 - - 100 - -
(12) Other subsidies and payments 3,725 -3 276 13,843 1,546 4,595
Total gross budgetary expenditures 682,031 172,999 485,710 644,082 154,443 451,953
Less revenues netted against expenditures:
Revenues 120,000 27,149 59,228 120,000 33,889 60,963
Total revenues netted against expenditures 120,000 27,149 59,228 120,000 33,889 60,963
Total net budgetary expenditures 562,031 145,850 426,482 524,082 120,554 390,990

Food Services and Drinking Places (Monthly): CVs for Total Sales by Geography - December 2018 to December 2019

CVs for Total Sales by Geography
Table summary
This table displays the results of CVs for Total Sales by Geography. The information is grouped by geography (appearing as row headers), Month, 2018012, 201901, 201902, 201903, 201904, 201905, 201906, 201907, 201908, 201909, 201910, 201911 and 201912 (appearing as column headers), calculated using percentage unit of measure (appearing as column headers).
Geography Month
201812 201901 201902 201903 201904 201905 201906 201907 201908 201909 201910 201911 201912
percentage
Canada 0.63 0.69 0.63 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.56 0.58 0.61
Newfoundland and Labrador 1.35 2.14 1.84 2.36 2.04 2.16 1.79 2.45 2.48 3.13 3.19 2.76 3.03
Prince Edward Island 3.46 3.11 2.65 3.37 3.12 0.57 1.99 6.84 4.93 4.01 4.53 4.04 3.28
Nova Scotia 2.49 2.42 3.49 3.37 2.42 2.90 2.65 4.67 4.63 2.77 2.94 3.46 3.50
New Brunswick 1.48 1.66 1.18 1.78 1.96 1.69 2.09 2.27 1.30 1.56 1.87 1.51 1.46
Quebec 1.17 1.21 1.14 1.01 1.26 1.07 1.48 1.35 1.41 1.32 1.26 1.37 1.18
Ontario 1.15 1.29 1.11 1.00 0.93 0.98 1.00 1.03 0.93 1.04 0.96 0.99 1.03
Manitoba 2.09 2.03 1.76 1.58 1.68 1.52 1.62 2.43 2.74 2.18 2.42 2.06 2.11
Saskatchewan 1.29 1.74 2.34 1.74 1.59 1.72 1.62 1.39 1.92 1.58 1.59 1.69 1.58
Alberta 1.72 2.01 1.80 1.81 1.25 1.42 1.39 1.31 1.23 1.18 1.23 1.22 1.27
British Columbia 1.64 1.66 1.68 1.49 1.52 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.55 1.61 1.62 1.63 1.96
Yukon Territory 4.18 3.78 3.69 3.65 3.09 4.72 4.89 4.04 4.89 5.91 7.04 6.07 6.72
Northwest Territories 0.89 0.85 0.73 1.03 0.80 0.96 1.03 0.99 0.91 1.00 1.46 1.58 0.90
Nunavut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00